Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Synoptic problem --- Bible. --- Bible. --- Bible. --- Bible. --- Chronology --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Relation to Luke --- Relation to John

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

For a long time mainstream gospel scholarship has assumed that the so-called Q material (the "double tradition") in Matthew and Luke represents a document or tradition that was almost exclusively orientated towards the sayings of Jesus of Nazareth, with little interest in a narrative about him. This book argues, on the contrary, that the narrative material in the double tradition existed from the very beginning within a coherent Jesus narrative that ran from his baptism to his passion. Far from being inserted by Matthew and Luke into the framework of Mark, the double tradition is structured on the very same narrative framework as the Gospel of Mark (a framework that predates Mark). Conventional dichotomies in gospel origins, the historical Jesus, and the history of early Christianity are thus drawn into question. Lange Zeit ist die Forschung zu den Evangelien davon ausgegangen, daß das sog. Q-Material im Matthäus- und Lukasevangelium eine Quelle oder eine Tradition darstellt, die fast ausschließlich an den Logien Jesu von Nazareth interessiert war, kaum dagegen an Erzählungen über ihn. Die vorliegende Studie zeigt demgegenüber, daß das Erzählgut in Q von Anfang an existierte, und zwar innerhalb einer Jesus-Erzählung, die von seiner Taufe bis zur Passion reichte. Dieser Erzählrahmen gleicht demjenigen von Markus, ist aber älter. Matthäus und Lukas haben das Q-Material keineswegs in den Erzählrahmen von Markus eingefügt. Die bisherigen differenzierten Forschungspositionen zur Entstehung der Evangelien, zum historischen Jesus und zur Geschichte des frühen Christentums stehen dabei zur Diskussion.

Synoptic problem --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 225.015 --- Nieuw Testament: literaire kritiek; authenticiteit; bronnenstudie --- Theses --- 225.015 Nieuw Testament: Formgeschichte; Traditionsgeschichte; Redaktionsgeschichte --- 225.015 Nieuw Testament: literaire kritiek; authenticiteit; bronnenstudie --- Nieuw Testament: Formgeschichte; Traditionsgeschichte; Redaktionsgeschichte --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible. --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Synoptic problem.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This is the first book to examine the Aramaic dimension of Q since the Aramaic Dead Sea scrolls made such work more feasible. Maurice Casey gives a detailed examination of key passages in Matthew and Luke's gospels, demonstrating that they used two different Greek translations of an Aramaic source, which can be reconstructed. He overturns the conventional model of Q as a single Greek document, and shows that Jesus said everything in the original Aramaic source. Further analysis of other gospel passages shows the evangelists editing a Greek translation of an Aramaic source. On one, it can be shown that Mark utilises a different Aramaic source. A complex model of Q is thus proposed. Casey argues that Aramaic sources behind part of Q are of extremely early date, and should contribute significantly to the quest for the historical Jesus.

Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Aramaic literature --- Relation to the New Testament. --- Document Q (Critique biblique) --- Hypothèse Q (Exégèse des synoptiques) --- Jésus-Christ--Logia --- Logia (Critique biblique) --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q [Tradition ] --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Quelle-hypothese (Exegese van de synoptici) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Source Q (Critique biblique) --- Tradition Q --- 226.1 --- -Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Middle Eastern literature --- Relation to the New Testament --- Arts and Humanities --- Religion --- Aramaic literature - Relation to the New Testament.