Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
urban areas --- urban areas --- Sewerage --- Sewerage --- drainage systems --- drainage systems --- water management --- water management --- Hydrology --- Hydrology --- Measurement --- Measurement --- monitoring --- monitoring
Choose an application
Hydraulic engineering --- Railway traffic --- World history --- anno 1800-1999 --- Sanitary engineering --- Municipal engineering --- Subways --- History --- Sewerage --- France --- Paris (France) --- 19th century --- 20th century --- Sanitary engineering - France - Paris - History --- Municipal engineering - France - Paris - History --- Subways - France - Paris - History
Choose an application
Rivers --- water supply --- Rainwater --- Wastewater --- Sewerage --- Flow rate --- Water quality --- Measurement --- monitoring --- Eaux usées --- Sewage --- Sewage disposal in the ground. --- Épuration. --- Purification. --- Évacuation dans le sol.
Choose an application
Why did reform in Santiago improve water system performance, when similar reform attempts under public management in other countries failed? In the late 1980s, Chile planned to privatize Santiago's sanitary works enterprise (EMOS) but instead reformed it under public ownership. It did so through a regulatory framework that mimicked the design of a concession with a private utility, setting tariffs that ensured at least a 7 percent return on assets, creating a neutral regulator independent of ministry intervention, and giving EMOS the right to appeal the regulator's tariff decisions. This reform of Santiago's water system is often cited as a case of successful reform under public management. Comparing a comprehensive measure of welfare with a counterfactual example, Shirley, Xu, and Zuluaga show surprisingly large gains from Santiago's reform, given the relatively good initial conditions. (The gains accrued largely to government and employees, but consumers benefited from improved service and coverage.) Why did reform in Santiago improve water system performance, when similar reform attempts under public management in other countries failed? Chile has a long tradition of private water rights, shaped by early recognition that water is a scarce and tradable private good; The reformed regulatory framework was designed to attract private investors to the water system and to motivate them to operate efficiently and expand the system; Chile's unique electoral institutions sustained this framework under state operation after democracy was restored; Chile's strong bureaucratic norms and institutions (permitting little corruption), combined with Santiago's relatively low-cost water system, permitted prices that effectively increased quasi-rents for investing in the system while minimizing the risk of inefficiency or monopoly rents. The authors also address the question of why EMOS was reformed but not privatized, and what the costs of not privatizing were. The system was privatized in 1999, but the changes from privatization are likely to be less significant than those introduced in 1989-90. This paper - a product of Regulation and Competition Policy, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to draw lessons from regulatory reform and understand political and institutional change. This study was funded by the Bank's Research Support Budget under the research project Competition and Privatization in Urban Water Supply (RPO 682-64). Mary Shirley may be contacted at mshirley@worldbank.org.
Bill Collection --- Cubic Meters --- Debt Markets --- Economic Theory and Research --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial Literacy --- Industry --- Infrastructure Economics and Finance --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Number Of Connections --- Price Of Water --- Private Participation in Infrastructure --- Private Sector Development --- Private Utility --- Public Works --- Sewage Treatment --- Sewerage Services --- Tariff Decisions --- Tariff Setting --- Tariff Setting Process --- Town Water Supply and Sanitation --- Urban Water --- Urban Water Supply --- Urban Water Supply and Sanitation --- Water and Industry --- Water Companies --- Water Conservation --- Water Consumption --- Water Resources --- Water Sector --- Water Services --- Water Supply and Sanitation --- Water Supply and Sanitation Governance and Institutions --- Water Supply and Systems --- Water System --- Water Systems --- Water Tariffs
Choose an application
Why did reform in Santiago improve water system performance, when similar reform attempts under public management in other countries failed? In the late 1980s, Chile planned to privatize Santiago's sanitary works enterprise (EMOS) but instead reformed it under public ownership. It did so through a regulatory framework that mimicked the design of a concession with a private utility, setting tariffs that ensured at least a 7 percent return on assets, creating a neutral regulator independent of ministry intervention, and giving EMOS the right to appeal the regulator's tariff decisions. This reform of Santiago's water system is often cited as a case of successful reform under public management. Comparing a comprehensive measure of welfare with a counterfactual example, Shirley, Xu, and Zuluaga show surprisingly large gains from Santiago's reform, given the relatively good initial conditions. (The gains accrued largely to government and employees, but consumers benefited from improved service and coverage.) Why did reform in Santiago improve water system performance, when similar reform attempts under public management in other countries failed? Chile has a long tradition of private water rights, shaped by early recognition that water is a scarce and tradable private good; The reformed regulatory framework was designed to attract private investors to the water system and to motivate them to operate efficiently and expand the system; Chile's unique electoral institutions sustained this framework under state operation after democracy was restored; Chile's strong bureaucratic norms and institutions (permitting little corruption), combined with Santiago's relatively low-cost water system, permitted prices that effectively increased quasi-rents for investing in the system while minimizing the risk of inefficiency or monopoly rents. The authors also address the question of why EMOS was reformed but not privatized, and what the costs of not privatizing were. The system was privatized in 1999, but the changes from privatization are likely to be less significant than those introduced in 1989-90. This paper - a product of Regulation and Competition Policy, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to draw lessons from regulatory reform and understand political and institutional change. This study was funded by the Bank's Research Support Budget under the research project Competition and Privatization in Urban Water Supply (RPO 682-64). Mary Shirley may be contacted at mshirley@worldbank.org.
Bill Collection --- Cubic Meters --- Debt Markets --- Economic Theory and Research --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial Literacy --- Industry --- Infrastructure Economics and Finance --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Number Of Connections --- Price Of Water --- Private Participation in Infrastructure --- Private Sector Development --- Private Utility --- Public Works --- Sewage Treatment --- Sewerage Services --- Tariff Decisions --- Tariff Setting --- Tariff Setting Process --- Town Water Supply and Sanitation --- Urban Water --- Urban Water Supply --- Urban Water Supply and Sanitation --- Water and Industry --- Water Companies --- Water Conservation --- Water Consumption --- Water Resources --- Water Sector --- Water Services --- Water Supply and Sanitation --- Water Supply and Sanitation Governance and Institutions --- Water Supply and Systems --- Water System --- Water Systems --- Water Tariffs
Choose an application
Cities and towns --- Water --- Housing --- Villes --- Eau --- Logement --- Urbanization --- Water-supply --- Low-income housing --- Sustainable development --- Environmental aspects --- Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam) --- Social conditions --- Economic conditions --- Environmental conditions --- Approvisionnement en eau --- water supply --- Urbanisation --- housing --- Zone urbaine --- urban areas --- Démographie --- Demography --- Niveau de vie --- living standards --- Impact sur l'environnement --- Environmental impact --- Viet Nam --- 628.1 --- 628.2 --- 711.8 --- 711.4 <5> --- 351.778.5 --- 728.1 --- Water supply, treatment, consumption and use --- Urban water removal. Town drainage, sewerage --- Planologie: openbare nutsvoorzieningen --- Gemeentelijke planologie. Stadsplanning. Stedenbouw--Azië --- Ruimtelijke ordening. Volkshuisvesting. Plannen van aanleg. Woningbouw.--Woonhygiene, zie {613.5}; z.o. {?711.6-164} --- Woonhuizen. Woningbouw (algemeen) --- 728.1 Woonhuizen. Woningbouw (algemeen) --- 351.778.5 Ruimtelijke ordening. Volkshuisvesting. Plannen van aanleg. Woningbouw.--Woonhygiene, zie {613.5}; z.o. {?711.6-164} --- 711.4 <5> Gemeentelijke planologie. Stadsplanning. Stedenbouw--Azië --- 711.8 Planologie: openbare nutsvoorzieningen --- 628.2 Urban water removal. Town drainage, sewerage --- 628.1 Water supply, treatment, consumption and use --- Availability, Water --- Water availability --- Water resources --- Natural resources --- Public utilities --- Water resources development --- Water utilities --- Cities and towns, Movement to --- Urban development --- Urban systems --- Social history --- Sociology, Rural --- Sociology, Urban --- Urban policy --- Rural-urban migration --- Development, Sustainable --- Ecologically sustainable development --- Economic development, Sustainable --- Economic sustainability --- ESD (Ecologically sustainable development) --- Smart growth --- Sustainable economic development --- Economic development --- Poor --- Inclusionary housing programs --- Hu Zhiming Shi (Vietnam) --- Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh (Vietnam) --- Ho-Tschi-Minh-Stadt (Vietnam) --- Hočiminovo Město (Vietnam) --- HCMC (Vietnam) --- Hu Chih-ming shih (Vietnam) --- Saigon (Vietnam : 1976- ) --- Sài Gòn (Vietnam : 1976- ) --- HCM (Vietnam) --- Saigon (Vietnam) --- Economic conditions. --- Environmental conditions. --- Social conditions. --- Thành phó̂ Hò̂ Chí Minh (Vietnam) --- TP. Hồ Chí Minh (Vietnam) --- Urbanization - Vietnam - Ho Chi Minh City --- Water-supply - Environmental aspects - Vietnam - Ho Chi Minh City --- Low-income housing - Vietnam - Ho Chi Minh City --- Sustainable development - Vietnam - Ho Chi Minh City --- Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam) - Social conditions --- Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam) - Economic conditions --- Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam) - Environmental conditions
Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|