Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
May 2000 - How much a developing country can take advantage of technology transfer from foreign direct investment depends partly on how well educated and well trained its workforce is, how much it is willing to invest in research and development, and how much protection it offers for intellectual property rights. Saggi surveys the literature on trade and foreign direct investment - especially wholly owned subsidiaries of multinational firms and international joint ventures - as channels for technology transfer. He also discusses licensing and other arm's-length channels of technology transfer. He concludes: How trade encourages growth depends on whether knowledge spillover is national or international. Spillover is more likely to be national for developing countries than for industrial countries; Local policy often makes pure foreign direct investment infeasible, so foreign firms choose licensing or joint ventures. The jury is still out on whether licensing or joint ventures lead to more learning by local firms; Policies designed to attract foreign direct investment are proliferating. Several plant-level studies have failed to find positive spillover from foreign direct investment to firms competing directly with subsidiaries of multinationals. (However, these studies treat foreign direct investment as exogenous and assume spillover to be horizontal - when it may be vertical.) All such studies do find the subsidiaries of multinationals to be more productive than domestic firms, so foreign direct investment does result in host countries using resources more effectively; Absorptive capacity in the host country is essential for getting significant benefits from foreign direct investment. Without adequate human capital or investments in research and development, spillover fails to materialize; A country's policy on protection of intellectual property rights affects the type of industry it attracts. Firms for which such rights are crucial (such as pharmaceutical firms) are unlikely to invest directly in countries where such protections are weak, or will not invest in manufacturing and research and development activities. Policy on intellectual property rights also influences whether technology transfer comes through licensing, joint ventures, or the establishment of wholly owned subsidiaries. This paper - a product of Trade, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to study microfoundations of international technology diffusion. The study was funded by the Bank's Research Support Budget under the research project Microfoundations of International Technology Diffusion. The author may be contacted at ksaggi@mail.smu.edu.
Attributes --- Basic --- E-Business --- E-Mail --- Economic Theory and Research --- Emerging Markets --- Foreign Direct Investment --- High Technology --- ICT Policy and Strategies --- Industry --- Information --- Information and Communication Technologies --- International Economics & Trade --- Inventors --- Know-How --- Knowledge Economy --- Labor Policies --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Microfinance --- New Technologies --- Outsourcing --- Private Sector Development --- Semiconductor --- Semiconductor Industry --- Social Protections and Labor --- Systems --- Technological Change --- Technologies --- Technology --- Technology Industry --- Technology Licensing --- Technology Spillovers --- Technology Transfer --- Trade and Regional Integration
Choose an application
April 2000 - Developing country governments tend to favor joint ventures over other forms of foreign direct investment, believing that local participation facilitates the transfer of technology and marketing skills. However, foreign investors who are technological or marketing leaders in their industries are more likely to invest in wholly owned projects than to share ownership. Thus in R&D-intensive sectors joint ventures may offer less potential for transferring technology and marketing techniques than wholly owned subsidiaries. Developing country governments tend to favor joint ventures over other forms of foreign direct investment, believing that local participation facilitates the transfer of technology and marketing skills. Smarzynska assesses joint ventures' potential for such transfers by comparing the characteristics of foreign investors engaged in joint ventures with those of foreign investors engaged in wholly owned projects in transition economies in the early 1990s. Unlike the existing literature, Smarzynska focuses on intra-industry differences rather than interindustry differences in R&D and advertising intensity. Empirical analysis shows that foreign investors who are technological or marketing leaders in their industries are more likely to invest in wholly owned projects than to share ownership. This is true in high- and medium-technology sectors but not in industries with low R&D spending. Smarzynska concludes that it is inappropriate to treat industries as homogeneous in investigating modes of investment. She also suggests that in sectors with high R&D spending joint ventures may present less potential for transfer of technology and marketing techniques than wholly owned subsidiaries. This paper - a product of Trade, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to study the contribution of trade and foreign direct investment to technology transfer. The author may be contacted at bsmarzynska@worldbank.org
Advertising --- Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems --- Agriculture --- Buyer --- Debt Markets --- E-Business --- Emerging Markets --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial Literacy --- Foreign Direct Investment --- Foreign Investment --- Foreign Investments --- Industry --- Information --- Intangible Assets --- International Economics & Trade --- International Trade --- Investment and Investment Climate --- Joint Ventures --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Manufacturing --- Manufacturing Industries --- Marketing --- Microfinance --- New Technologies --- Private Information --- Private Sector Development --- Profits --- Proprietary Knowledge --- R&D --- Results --- Rural Development --- Technology --- Technology Industry --- Transactions --- Water and Industry --- Water Resources
Choose an application
May 2000 - How much a developing country can take advantage of technology transfer from foreign direct investment depends partly on how well educated and well trained its workforce is, how much it is willing to invest in research and development, and how much protection it offers for intellectual property rights. Saggi surveys the literature on trade and foreign direct investment - especially wholly owned subsidiaries of multinational firms and international joint ventures - as channels for technology transfer. He also discusses licensing and other arm's-length channels of technology transfer. He concludes: How trade encourages growth depends on whether knowledge spillover is national or international. Spillover is more likely to be national for developing countries than for industrial countries; Local policy often makes pure foreign direct investment infeasible, so foreign firms choose licensing or joint ventures. The jury is still out on whether licensing or joint ventures lead to more learning by local firms; Policies designed to attract foreign direct investment are proliferating. Several plant-level studies have failed to find positive spillover from foreign direct investment to firms competing directly with subsidiaries of multinationals. (However, these studies treat foreign direct investment as exogenous and assume spillover to be horizontal - when it may be vertical.) All such studies do find the subsidiaries of multinationals to be more productive than domestic firms, so foreign direct investment does result in host countries using resources more effectively; Absorptive capacity in the host country is essential for getting significant benefits from foreign direct investment. Without adequate human capital or investments in research and development, spillover fails to materialize; A country's policy on protection of intellectual property rights affects the type of industry it attracts. Firms for which such rights are crucial (such as pharmaceutical firms) are unlikely to invest directly in countries where such protections are weak, or will not invest in manufacturing and research and development activities. Policy on intellectual property rights also influences whether technology transfer comes through licensing, joint ventures, or the establishment of wholly owned subsidiaries. This paper - a product of Trade, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to study microfoundations of international technology diffusion. The study was funded by the Bank's Research Support Budget under the research project Microfoundations of International Technology Diffusion. The author may be contacted at ksaggi@mail.smu.edu.
Attributes --- Basic --- E-Business --- E-Mail --- Economic Theory and Research --- Emerging Markets --- Foreign Direct Investment --- High Technology --- ICT Policy and Strategies --- Industry --- Information --- Information and Communication Technologies --- International Economics & Trade --- Inventors --- Know-How --- Knowledge Economy --- Labor Policies --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Microfinance --- New Technologies --- Outsourcing --- Private Sector Development --- Semiconductor --- Semiconductor Industry --- Social Protections and Labor --- Systems --- Technological Change --- Technologies --- Technology --- Technology Industry --- Technology Licensing --- Technology Spillovers --- Technology Transfer --- Trade and Regional Integration
Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|