Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Nature --- Ecologie --- Dignite. --- Crise ecologique --- Nature conservation. --- Ecology --- Dignity. --- Environmental ethics. --- Conservation. --- Philosophie. --- Aspect moral. --- Philosophy.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Capacity and disability --- Incapacité (Droit) --- Droit civil --- Incapacité (droit) --- Vulnérabilité (droit) --- Dignité de la personne (droit) --- droit civil --- burgerlijk recht --- Incapacité (Droit) --- Belgique

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Dignity plays a central role in current thinking about law and human rights, but there is sharp disagreement about its meaning. Combining conceptual precision with a broad historical background, Michael Rosen puts these controversies in context and offers a novel, constructive proposal.Drawing on law, politics, religion, and culture, as well as philosophy, Rosen shows how modern conceptions of dignity inherit several distinct strands of meaning. This is why users of the word nowadays often talk past one another. The idea of dignity as the foundation for the universal entitlement to human rights represented the coming together after the Second World War of two extremely powerful traditions: Christian theology and Kantian philosophy. Not only is this idea of dignity as an "inner transcendental kernel" behind human rights problematic, Rosen argues, it has drawn attention away from a different, very important, sense of dignity: the right to be treated with dignity, that is, with proper respect. At the heart of the argument stands the giant figure of Immanuel Kant. Challenging current orthodoxy, Rosen's interpretation presents Kant as a philosopher whose ethical thought is governed, above all, by the requirement of showing respect toward a kernel of value that each of us carries, indestructibly, within ourselves. Finally, Rosen asks (and answers) a surprisingly puzzling question: why do we still have a duty to treat the dead with dignity if they will not benefit from our respect?

Dignity --- Respect for persons --- Dignity. --- Respect for persons. --- Dignité --- Respect des personnes --- Conduct of life --- Persons --- Human dignity --- Values --- Cultuurfilosofie. Cultuurpsychologie --- Algemene ethiek --- Rechtstheorie. Rechtsmethode. Rechtsfilosofie

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Human rights --- Professional ethics. Deontology --- Medical ethics. --- Bioethics. --- Dignity. --- Ethique médicale --- Bioéthique --- Dignité --- Medical ethics --- Bioethics --- Dignity --- #GBIB:CBMER --- Biomedical ethics --- Clinical ethics --- Ethics, Medical --- Health care ethics --- Medical care --- Medicine --- Professional ethics --- Nursing ethics --- Social medicine --- Human dignity --- Values --- Biology --- Life sciences --- Life sciences ethics --- Science --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Ethique médicale --- Bioéthique --- Dignité

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Civil rights --- Droits de l'homme --- Civil rights. --- Human rights. --- 342 --- Staatsrecht. Publiekrecht --(algemeen) --- 342 Staatsrecht. Publiekrecht --(algemeen) --- Human rights --- Basic rights --- Civil rights (International law) --- Rights, Human --- Rights of man --- Human security --- Transitional justice --- Truth commissions --- Civil liberties --- Constitutional rights --- Fundamental rights --- Rights, Civil --- Constitutional law --- Political persecution --- Law and legislation --- Droit civil --- Personnes (droit) --- Dignité --- France --- Dignité