Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A significant new work of Christology. Few in the modern era have sought to write a full-scale systematic study of the mysteries of the life of Jesus. This is what Thomas Weinandy has provided. The Incarnation, Mariology, the virginal conception, the apostolic life and teaching, transfiguration and miracles, the atoning death and glorification of Christ: there is a wealth of original theological analysis in this book, presented in clear and accessible form. The author's longstanding study of historical exegesis, classical patristic doctrine, and modern Christological controversies is present in the background and gives rise to a deeply integrated theological portrait. This book is the fruit of a lifetime of learning and teaching but also of meditating profoundly on the mystery of Jesus Christ.

Synoptic problem --- Jesus Christ --- Bible. --- Criticism, interpretation, etc.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Hauptbeschreibung Sustained, comparative Synoptic studies do not stand alone methodologically in the humanities, but belong to a more general trend within cultural studies as well as in the humanities more broadly. Textual interpretation involves approaching specific texts composed more often than not by individual authors. In these texts, however, are embedded a myriad of conscious and unconscious relationships to historical and contemporary events, people, and other texts likewise connected historically and contemporaneously. In-depth understanding of a text evolves, therefore, al

Synoptic problem. --- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible. --- Hermeneutics --- Reception History --- Gospel of Mark --- Gospel of Matthew --- Kirchengeschichte --- Neues Testament --- Antike Religionsgeschichte

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The American and European public has a voracious appetite for more information about Jesus and the formation of early Christianity. The best-selling books on the subject by Marcus Borg, John Dominic Crossan, John Meyer, and Luke Timothy Johnson, among many others, attest to this hunger. But each of these scholars presents his own reading of the historical information, usually beginning with the earliest known Jesus-related material, Jesus'' sayings, and leads the public into a particular understanding of Jesus and the early Jesus movements. The New Q will provide the general public with the or

Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible. --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"This book discusses the composition of the synoptic gospels from the perspective of the Farrer hypothesis, a view that posits that Mark was written first, that Matthew used Mark as a source, and that Luke used both Mark and Matthew. All of the articles in the volume are written in support of the Farrer hypothesis, with the exception of the final chapter, which criticizes these articles from the perspective of the reigning Two-Source theory. The contributors engage the synoptic problem with a more refined understanding of the options set before each of the evangelists pointing towards a deepened understanding of how works were compiled in the first and early second centuries CE. The contributors include Andris Abakuks, Stephen Carlson, Eric Eve, Mark Goodacre, Heather Gorman, John S. Kloppenborg, David Landry, Mark Matson, Ken Olson, Michael Pahl, Jeffrey Peterson, and John C. Poirier."-- This book discusses the composition of the synoptic gospels from the perspective of the Farrer hypothesis, a view that posits that Mark was written first, that Matthew used Mark as a source, and that Luke used both Mark and Matthew. All of the articles in the volume are written in support of the Farrer hypothesis, with the exception of the final chapter, which criticizes these articles from the perspective of the reigning Two-Source theory. The contributors engage the synoptic problem with a more refined understanding of the options set before each of the evangelists pointing towards a deepened understanding of how works were compiled in the first and early second centuries CE. The contributors include Andris Abakuks, Stephen Carlson, Eric Eve, Mark Goodacre, Heather Gorman, John S. Kloppenborg, David Landry, Mark Matson, Ken Olson, Michael Pahl, Jeffrey Peterson, and John C. Poirier

Synoptic problem. --- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- 226.1 --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible. --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Marco (Book of the New Testament) --- Mark (Book of the New Testament) --- Markus (Book of the New Testament) --- Markusevangelium --- Vangelo di Marco --- Book of Mark

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This is the first book to examine the Aramaic dimension of Q since the Aramaic Dead Sea scrolls made such work more feasible. Maurice Casey gives a detailed examination of key passages in Matthew and Luke's gospels, demonstrating that they used two different Greek translations of an Aramaic source, which can be reconstructed. He overturns the conventional model of Q as a single Greek document, and shows that Jesus said everything in the original Aramaic source. Further analysis of other gospel passages shows the evangelists editing a Greek translation of an Aramaic source. On one, it can be shown that Mark utilises a different Aramaic source. A complex model of Q is thus proposed. Casey argues that Aramaic sources behind part of Q are of extremely early date, and should contribute significantly to the quest for the historical Jesus.

Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Aramaic literature --- Relation to the New Testament. --- Document Q (Critique biblique) --- Hypothèse Q (Exégèse des synoptiques) --- Jésus-Christ--Logia --- Logia (Critique biblique) --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q [Tradition ] --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Quelle-hypothese (Exegese van de synoptici) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Source Q (Critique biblique) --- Tradition Q --- 226.1 --- -Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Middle Eastern literature --- Relation to the New Testament --- Arts and Humanities --- Religion --- Aramaic literature - Relation to the New Testament.