Listing 1 - 10 of 15 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Max Weber argued that a religious group or individual is influenced by all kinds of things but if they claim to be acting in the name of religion, we should attempt to understand their perspective on religious grounds first. He gives religion credit for shaping a person's image of the world, and this image of the world can affect their view of their interests, and ultimately how they decide to take action. For Weber, religion is best understood as it responds to the human need for theodicy and soteriology. He believes that human beings are troubled with the question of theodicy. How can the extraordinary power of a divine god be reconciled with the imperfection of the world that he has created and rules over? People need to know, for example, why there is undeserved good fortune and suffering in the world. Religion offers people soteriological answers, or answers that provide opportunities for salvation - relief from suffering, and reassuring meaning. This volume is a collection of ten articles by Christopher Adair-Toteff that examine the fundamental aspects of Max Weber's sociology of religion. They were published between 2002 and 2015 in various renowned journals and deal with different topics such as charisma, asceticism, mysticism, theodicy, prophets, and "Kulturprotestantismus." In his work, the author attempts to understand, clarify, and interpret key concepts and themes in Weber's sociology of religion.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Ce livre collectif interroge la fécondité heuristique de la démarche wébérienne pour les sciences sociales d'aujourd’hui, alors même que celles-ci s’interrogent à nouveau sur leur fondement et sur leur objet. Il entend contribuer à une meilleure compréhension de l’œuvre de Max Weber à un moment où les références à celle-ci sont devenues plus nombreuses mais le plus souvent convenues, quand elles ne sont pas de l’ordre de la seule incantation ou qu’elles ne se réduisent pas à des stéréotypes rebattus.Alors que l’œuvre wébérienne articule en permanence analyse empirique, construction théorique et réflexion méthodologique, sa réception française a été et reste davantage cantonnée dans l’approche théorique et exégétique. Autour de quatre thématiques, le droit, la bureaucratie, la démagification du monde et l’art et la technique et en faisant appel, au-delà des spécialistes de Weber, à des chercheurs d’horizons divers qui « travaillent avec Max Weber », cet ouvrage veut rompre avec l’opposition stérile et inappropriée entre un Weber empiriste et un Weber théoricien et il ouvre le champ à des usages pluriels de l’œuvre wébérienne, sortant ainsi du seul domaine des « études wébériennes » , sans renoncer pour autant à la rigueur théorique et à la vigilance critique dont Weber reste un modèle.
Choose an application
Mit der Idee, den Staat nicht nur mit den Mitteln der juristischen Methode zu erfassen, sondern auch mit denen einer sozialen Staatslehre, hat Georg Jellinek der politischen Soziologie Max Webers entscheidende Anstöße gegeben. Ähnliches gilt für seinen Vorschlag, den Staat zu den gesellschaftlichen Gruppen in Beziehung zu setzen. Im Unterschied zur sozialen Staatslehre Jellineks behandelt die soziologische Staatslehre Webers jedoch auch Themen, die bei Jellinek nur in normwissenschaftlicher Perspektive erörtert werden: die Trias von Staatsgebiet, Staatsvolk und Staatsgewalt sowie die Verfassungen, Formen und Funktionen des Staates.Vor diesem Hintergrund werden die unterschiedlichen verfassungspolitischen Optionen beider Autoren beleuchtet, insbesondere das Verhältnis von parlamentarischer und plebiszitärer Herrschaft. Eine Neubewertung von Webers Vorschlägen zur Ausgestaltung des Präsidentenamts beschließt die Studie, die sich vor allem an Staatsrechtler, Politikwissenschaftler und Soziologen richtet.Der Verfasser hat zahlreiche Arbeiten zu Max Weber und zur historischen Soziologie des Staates veröffentlicht.
Political sociology. --- Sociological jurisprudence. --- Law. --- Jellinek, Georg, --- Weber, Max,
Choose an application
Based on analyses of the essays written by Max Weber on China, India, ancient Judaism and also on the dispersed material about Islam, Eastern Christianity and Occidental Christianity, this book examines the economic ethics of Asian and Christian traditions and their corresponding legal systems. Drawing also on Weber's methodology (particularly the concept of adequate causation), the author reveals that the nature of Asian religions as well as the nature of customary and other not formally rational laws in Asian cultures could not lead to modern capitalism out of their own sources, although capitalism could be adopted from the outside. The culture of the Occident, upon which capitalism is based, is revealed to consist of a double rationalisation: the formal rationality of the exterior circumstances of life (administrative and legal) and the innerworldly practical rationality of the inner motivations of the Protestants, supported by a goal-oriented rational technology.
Choose an application
Cet ouvrage confronte le concept wébérien de charisme aux pratiques politiques antiques. À quelles conditions peut-on parler du charisme de l’oligarque, du roi, du général, du consul, de l’empereur ? Quelles étaient, dans l’Antiquité grecque et romaine, les modalités concrètes de construction et de mise en scène du pouvoir charismatique ? Les contributions reviennent sur les réflexions de Weber en les mettant à l’épreuve d’études de cas contextualisées, s’inscrivant dans le temps court des crises ou sur la longue durée. En se gardant de (re)lire toute la vie politique antique au prisme du charisme, il s’agit de souligner l’utilité de ce concept pour saisir certains pouvoirs personnels et, en retour, d’évaluer l’intérêt de ces cas concrets pour ajuster le concept wébérien. L’ouvrage insiste ainsi sur l’importance de la rhétorique des émotions ou de la communauté émotionnelle, tout en soulignant la coexistence d’éléments charismatiques, légaux-rationnels et bureaucratiques. Il tente également de comprendre comment un pouvoir originairement révolutionnaire pouvait se « quotidienniser » sans pour autant disparaître.
Sociology & Anthropology --- antiquité --- quotidiennisation --- histoire politique --- anthropologie politique --- charisme --- Weber, Max,
Choose an application
sociology --- General ethics --- Sociology --- sociology of religion --- Religious studies --- Weber, Max --- Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- arbeidsethiek --- protestantse ethiek --- sociale stratificatie --- kapitalisme --- Luther, Martin --- 316.2 WEBER, MAX --- 316:2 --- Academic collection --- #SBIB:316.20H41 --- 316.2 WEBER, Max --- #A91F1 --- 316.3 --- Protestantse ethiek en kapitalisme --- 316:2 Godsdienstsociologie --- Godsdienstsociologie --- 316.2 WEBER, MAX Sociologische richtingen. Sociologische scholen. Sociologen--WEBER, MAX --- Sociologische richtingen. Sociologische scholen. Sociologen--WEBER, MAX --- De sociologie van Max Weber: primaire bronnen --- Sociologie --- Godsdienst --- Max Weber --- Kapitalisme --- Theorieën --- Sociologische theorieën --- Protestantisme --- Ethiek --- Sekten --- E-books --- Weber, Max (socioloog) --- Theorie --- Sociologische theorie --- Filosofie --- Psychologie --- Man --- Cultuur --- Erfelijkheidsleer --- Stadssamenleving --- Verpleegkunde --- Verplegingswetenschap --- Volwassene --- Sekte --- Sport --- Duurzaamheid --- Technologie --- Voeding --- Maatschappij --- Drank --- Gezondheid
Choose an application
By re-examining the political thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Hans Kelsen, this book offers a reflection on the nature of modern democracy and the question of its legitimacy. Pedro T. Magalhães shows that present-day elitist, populist and pluralist accounts of democracy owe, in diverse and often complicated ways, an intellectual debt to the interwar era, German-speaking, scholarly and political controversies on the problem(s) of modern democracy.A discussion of Weber's ambivalent diagnosis of modernity and his elitist views on democracy, as they were elaborated especially in the 1910s, sets the groundwork for the study. Against that backdrop, Schmitt's interwar political thought is interpreted as a form of neo-authoritarian populism, whereas Kelsen evinces robust, though not entirely unproblematic, pluralist consequences. In the conclusion, the author draws on Claude Lefort's concept of indeterminacy to sketch a potentially more fruitful way than can be gleaned from the interwar German discussions of conceiving the nexus between the elitist, populist and pluralist faces of modern democracy. The Legitimacy of Modern Democracy will be of interest to political theorists, political philosophers, intellectual historians, theoretically oriented political scientists, and legal scholars working in the subfields of constitutional law and legal theory.
Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Kelsen, Hans --- Weber, Max --- Schmitt, Carl --- Social Science / Social Work --- Political Science / World / Canadian --- Political Science --- Political science
Choose an application
Based on analyses of the essays written by Max Weber on China, India, ancient Judaism and also on the dispersed material about Islam, Eastern Christianity and Occidental Christianity, this book examines the economic ethics of Asian and Christian traditions and their corresponding legal systems. Drawing also on Weber's methodology (particularly the concept of adequate causation), the author reveals that the nature of Asian religions as well as the nature of customary and other not formally rational laws in Asian cultures could not lead to modern capitalism out of their own sources, although capitalism could be adopted from the outside. The culture of the Occident, upon which capitalism is based, is revealed to consist of a double rationalisation: the formal rationality of the exterior circumstances of life (administrative and legal) and the innerworldly practical rationality of the inner motivations of the Protestants, supported by a goal-oriented rational technology.
Religion and ethics. --- Religion and law. --- Weber, Max, --- Law --- Law and religion --- Ethics and religion --- Ethics --- Religious aspects --- ウェーバー, マックス --- Weber, Max --- Ma-kʻo-ssu Wei-po, --- Makesi Weibo, --- Pebŏ, --- Pebŏ, Maksŭ, --- Vēbā, Makkusu, --- Veber, Maks, --- Vemper, Max, --- Webŏ, Maksŭ, --- Wei-po, Ma-kʻo-ssu, --- Weibo, --- Weibo, Makesi, --- ובר, מאקס, --- ובר, מאכס --- ובר, מקס --- 韦伯,
Choose an application
Authority --- Bureaucracy --- Comparative government --- Leadership --- Autorité --- Bureaucratie --- Institutions politiques comparées --- Weber, Max, --- #SBIB:35H100 --- #SBIB:35H500 --- #SBIB:324H45 --- #A9212A --- Bestuurlijke organisatie: algemene werken --- Bestuur en samenleving: algemene werken --- Politieke sociologie: stratificatie en machtshiërarchie --- Autorité --- Institutions politiques comparées
Listing 1 - 10 of 15 | << page >> |
Sort by
|