Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Spätestens nachdem 1997 in Deutschland eine Diskussion über die geplante Verteilung der Gewinne der Europäischen Zentralbank an die nationalen Zentralbanken entbrannte, ist der Seigniorage neuer Mittelpunkt in der Streitfrage um Kosten und Nutzen der Europäischen Währungsunion. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, die Veränderung des Seigniorage seit Inkrafttreten des Maastrichter Vertrags im Jahre 1992 zu analysieren, festzustellen, welche Bedeutung das Bemühen hatte, die Konvergenzkriterien einzuhalten und zu bestimmen, welche Auswirkungen die Übertragung des Banknotenmonopols von den nationalen Zentralbanken auf die Europäische Zentralbank haben wird. Im Anschluß an diese Analyse werden die – allerdings geringen – Auswirkungen des Verteilungsschlüssels untersucht.
Bedeutung --- dessen --- Europäischen --- Fiskalische --- Haushalte --- Klopfleisch --- Konsequenzen --- nationalen --- Seigniorage --- Veränderung --- Währungsunion
Choose an application
Die Satzung des Europäischen Systems der Zentralbanken sieht eine Umverteilung von Geldschöpfungsgewinnen (Seigniorage) zwischen den Notenbanken des Eurosystems vor. Die Diskussion um die «Gewinner» und «Verlierer» aus dieser Regelung wird sehr kontrovers geführt. Die Arbeit versucht, diese Umverteilungsproblematik systematisch zu analysieren. Insbesondere die theoretischen Grundlagen des Seigniorage, die mannigfaltigen Tätigkeiten der EWU-Zentralbanken und deren Auswirkungen auf die Entstehung der Notenbankgewinne sowie die Verwendung der Geldschöpfungsgewinne werden detailliert untersucht.
Analyse --- Eine --- eurogeld --- Eurosystems --- geschichte des euro --- neue währung --- Notenbankgewinnentstehung --- Rösl --- Seigniorage --- verwendung
Choose an application
This paper reviews how central banks allocate seigniorage, based on systematic crosscountry comparisons of their financial accounts. Central banks are classified as weak or strong, depending upon their structural profitability. Weak central banks typically (although not exclusively) operate in smaller and less wealthy countries, lack independence from their governments, and are burdened by compulsory transfers and low capital. Their operating expenditures, nonperforming assets, international reserve carrying costs, and international reserve accumulation needs are high. Governance appears to be a potential concern in many central banks, both weak and strong, with operating expenditures often adjusting upward for high profitability and capital accumulation adjusting downward for low profitability. The main policy implications are briefly reviewed.
Banks and banking, Central. --- Electronic books. -- local. --- Seigniorage (Finance) -- Econometric models. --- Finance --- Business & Economics --- Banking --- Seigniorage (Finance) --- Econometric models. --- Seigneurage (Finance) --- Seignorage (Finance) --- Banker's banks --- Banks, Central --- Central banking --- Central banks --- Banks and banking --- Banks and Banking --- Macroeconomics --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Public Finance --- Industries: Financial Services --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government --- Financial Institutions and Services: General --- Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General --- Monetary Systems --- Standards --- Regimes --- Government and the Monetary System --- Payment Systems --- Monetary Policy --- Public finance & taxation --- Monetary economics --- Distressed institutions --- Personal income --- Expenditure --- Currencies --- Financial institutions --- National accounts --- Money --- International reserves --- Financial services industry --- Income --- Expenditures, Public --- Foreign exchange reserves --- United States
Choose an application
While most economists agree that seigniorage is one way governments finance deficits, there is less agreement about the political, institutional, and economic reasons for relying on it. This paper investigates the main determinants of seigniorage using panel data on about 100 countries, for the period 1960-1999. Estimates show that greater political instability leads to higher seigniorage, especially in developing, less democratic, and socially polarized countries, with high inflation, low access to domestic and external debt financing and with higher turnover of central bank presidents. One important policy implication of this study is the need to develop institutions conducive to greater economic freedom as a means to lower the reliance on seigniorage financing of public deficits.
Budget deficits. --- Electronic books. -- local. --- Financial institutions. --- Monetary policy. --- Political stability -- Economic aspects. --- Seigniorage (Finance). --- Banks and Banking --- Inflation --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Agribusiness --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy --- Stabilization --- Treasury Policy --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Agriculture: General --- Monetary economics --- Macroeconomics --- Banking --- Agricultural economics --- Monetary base --- Central bank autonomy --- Agricultural sector --- Money --- Prices --- Central banks --- Economic sectors --- Money supply --- Agricultural industries --- United States
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|