Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This Report documents the medical record abstraction form and guidelines used to collect data on the quality of prenatal care for the HMO Quality of Care Consortium project. The abstraction form was designed to be consistent with the format of a medical record to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of the abstraction process. Within each set of related items, the specific source of data in the medical record was specified. For example, both progress notes and laboratory reports are used as sources of information about tests that were done during the prenatal care period. In addition, items derived from a particular part of the medical record were grouped. To standardize the abstraction process, a detailed set of guidelines was prepared to accompany the abstraction form. The guidelines define medical terms, specify data sources to be used in obtaining information from the medical record, and provide important medical synonyms. Each item in the abstraction form has a corresponding section in the guidelines.
Prenatal care --- Medical records --- Prenatal Care --- Quality Assurance, Health Care --- Evaluation --- Forms. --- Abstracting and indexing. --- standards.
Choose an application
Acute and chronic pain are common among service members, with musculoskeletal pain and injuries being the leading cause of nondeployability among active-duty service members. Given the significant implications for individual health and force readiness, providing high-quality pain care to service members is a priority of the Military Health System (MHS). Prior RAND research used administrative data to assess the quality and safety of pain care and opioid prescribing in the MHS, generated a set of quality measures that the MHS could adopt going forward, and identified strengths and opportunities for improvement in care provided to service members with pain conditions. In this report, authors document findings from interviews with MHS administrators, providers, and patients, providing valuable detail and context for those findings, along with on-the-ground perspectives on MHS pain care policies and guidance in practice. Staff and patients recommended prioritizing increases in treatment access and availability to improve pain care, and patients emphasized effective treatment and patient-centered care as the most important facilitators of high-quality pain care.
Medicine, Military --- Chronic pain --- Pain --- Treatment --- Treatment --- United States --- Armed Forces --- Medical care
Choose an application
Behavioral health (BH) conditions—such as posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety—are the second most common medical reasons for nondeployability in the U.S. Army. The authors of this report aimed to identify promising metrics to assess readiness among soldiers and adult family members who receive BH care. These metrics would expand the Army's outcome monitoring, which currently includes symptom improvement metrics, for patients who received BH care. The authors developed rigorous criteria to evaluate candidate readiness metrics, conducted interviews with stakeholders (Army subject-matter experts and BH providers), reviewed existing sources of data that could support the development of a readiness metric, and conducted a literature review to identify instruments that have been used to measure readiness-related domains in both military and civilian populations. The authors found that no existing data source or patient self-report instrument met criteria for implementation of a readiness metric for soldiers, but one instrument, the Walter Reed Functional Impairment Scale (WRFIS), is promising. No existing data source or patient self-report instrument met criteria for Army-wide implementation of a readiness metric for adult family members. Stakeholders reported that psychiatric symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and impaired functioning are important indicators of lack of readiness among soldiers and adult family members. BH providers reported variability in assessing readiness and applying profiles, but behavioral experts provided suggestions for improving readiness assessment. The authors recommend that the Army conduct a pilot evaluation of a soldier readiness metric based on the WRFIS and increase standardization in applying profiles by continuing provider training.
Families of military personnel --- Soldiers --- Services for --- Evaluation. --- Mental health --- United States
Choose an application
Geographic location can be a barrier to accessing and receiving high-quality behavioral health care for both civilians and military personnel. As a consequence, service members who reside far from military treatment facilities may be at higher risk for poorer clinical outcomes than those who are less remotely located. The authors evaluate remote service members' access to Military Health System (MHS) care for those with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, or substance use disorder (SUD) and assess the quality of the behavioral health care they received. The report highlights how quality-measure performance varies by remote status, focusing on differences in quality of care that are large and potentially clinically significant. The authors also discuss policy implications and offer recommendations for how the military can use new strategies — including synchronous telehealth or technology-enabled interventions — to ensure access to high-quality care for all service members, regardless of location.
Soldiers --- Rural health --- Medicine, Military --- Mental health services --- United States.
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|