Listing 1 - 10 of 23 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
La communauté internationale s’est dotée du jus cogens sans lui conférer un contenu déterminé, laissant aux juridictions internationales le soin de déterminer le contenu substantif des normes impératives. Alors que la Cour internationale de Justice ne semble pas avoir embrassé ce rôle, la Cour interaméricaine des droits de l’homme a développé une méthode d’interprétation entièrement axée sur la protection de la personne humaine, qui l’a inéluctablement menée à conférer un contenu au jus cogens. La Cour a mis sur pied un système cohérent de droits et d’obligations, au sommet duquel se situent les droits impératifs, dont la sanction entraine la responsabilité aggravée de l’État. Plusieurs facteurs ont contribué à cette activité jurisprudentielle innovante que la présente étude analyse. Il importe de voir cependant si le discours universaliste de la Cour basé sur l’unicité de la personne humaine est susceptible de contribuer à l’édification d’un jus cogens réellement universel. Prix Mariano Garcia Rubio 2010 du meilleur mémoire de Master en droit international. The adoption of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in 1969 introduced the concept of jus cogens into the realm of the international legal order. The international community of States nevertheless decided to leave the determination of its substantive content to international Courts. While the International Court of Justice appears to have been reluctant to perform such a function, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has developed a creative and dynamic method of interpretation intended to afford a full and complete protection to human beings; such an approach resulted inevitably in the identification of the content of peremptory norms. The Inter-American Court has therefore established a coherent system of rights and obligations where violations of jus cogens norms leads to the aggravated responsibility of the defendant State. The aim of this study is, on the one hand, to identify the factors…
Choose an application
La timide recomposition du paysage politique en cours dans un nombre croissant d’États africains est sans conteste le produit en même temps que le moteur de la revendication des droits de l’homme dans ces mêmes États. Adoptée en 1981, la Charte africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples a, avant l’heure, mis l’emphase sur cette relation dialectique entre libération des peuples et libertés de l’individu. Ce n’est pas là la moindre originalité de cette convention régionale que le présent ouvrage se propose d’analyser minutieusement sur un plan juridique. Pour l’essentiel, l’ouvrage consiste en un examen approfondi du contenu normatif et institutionnel de la Charte africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples. Cette étude apporte des réponses précises à toute une série de questions qui ne manquent pas d’interpeller le juriste. En consacrant par exemple les devoirs de l’individu, cette convention ne reprend-elle pas d’un côté ce qu’elle donne de l’autre à l’individu ? Les droits de l’individu ne risquent-ils pas d’être sacrifiés sur l’autel des droits du peuple ? À cet égard, un des principaux mérites de cette étude est qu’elle n’hésite pas à explorer certains pans entiers du droit international général ; il en va ainsi à propos de l’absence de clause de dérogation qui fait l’objet d’une analyse rigoureuse sous l’angle du droit des traités ou encore de la question des droits du peuple. Le fonctionnement de la Commission africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples, installée à Banjul (Gambie) en 1989, est également examiné dans le détail. L’étude s’achève par une évaluation générale de la Charte africaine et de son rôle potentiel dans la protection des droits de l’homme en Afrique. Première monographie exhaustive en langue française sur la Charte africaine, elle est un ouvrage incontournable pour tout praticien du droit ou des relations internationales intéressé par la problématique des droits de l’homme en Afrique.
Human rights --- Africa --- -Basic rights --- Civil rights (International law) --- Rights, Human --- Rights of man --- Human security --- Transitional justice --- Truth commissions --- Law and legislation --- -Human rights --- African Charter on Human and People's Rights --- ACHPR --- A.C.H.P.R. --- African Charter --- Banjul Charter --- Carta africana dei diritti dell'uomo e dei popoli --- Charte africaine des droits de l'homme et des peuples --- Dina afrikanina momba ny zon'ny olombelona sy ny vahoaka --- Etat | nation --- droits humains --- décolonisation --- société civile --- CIJ - Cour internationale de justice --- justice --- politique internationale --- droit public --- DROITS DE L'HOMME (DROIT INTERNATIONAL) --- DROITS DE L'HOMME --- AFRIQUE --- HISTOIRE --- 19E-20E SIECLES --- CONDITIONS SOCIALES --- 20E SIECLE
Choose an application
Signed on 26 June 1945, the Charter of the United Nations is the Organization's constitutive instrument, setting out the rights and obligations of Member States, and establishing its principal organs and procedures.
Constitution. --- International Court of Justice. --- CIJ --- Cour internationale de justice --- M.T.S. --- MTS --- Mǐędzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- Milletlerarası Adalet Divanı --- I.C.J. --- ICJ --- Hague. --- Corte Internacional de Justicia --- Internationaler Gerichtshof --- Dīvān-i Bayn al-Milalī-i Dādgustarī --- Dīvān-i Lāhah --- Corte internazionale di giustizia --- Kokusai Shihō Saibansho --- Sān Yuttitham rawāng Prathēt --- Maḥkamat al-ʻAdl al-Dawlīyah --- Diethnes Dikastērion --- United Nations. --- C.I.J. --- World Court --- Tribunal Internacional de Justicia --- Mezhdunarodnyĭ Sud OON --- Curtea Internațională de Justiție --- Gjykata Ndërkombëtare e Drejtësisë --- GJND --- Meǵunarodniot sud na pravdata --- Nemzetközi Bíróság --- Olon Ulsyn Shu̇u̇kh --- Nėgdsėn U̇ndėstniĭ Shu̇u̇kh --- Permanent Court of International Justice --- Permanent Court of Arbitration
Choose an application
This book traces the impact that the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, has had on various areas of international law. A number of prominent international experts examine whether, and to what extent, international law has been shaped by the Court's jurisprudence. The informal development of international law through the Court's judgments contrasts with the development of international law through more deliberate means, such astreaty-making. Assessing key areas of international law over which the ICJ has exercised its jurisdiction, such as
International law. --- International Court of Justice --- Influence. --- Law of nations --- Nations, Law of --- Public international law --- Law --- CIJ --- Cour internationale de justice --- M.T.S. --- MTS --- Mǐędzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- Milletlerarası Adalet Divanı --- I.C.J. --- ICJ --- Hague. --- Corte Internacional de Justicia --- Internationaler Gerichtshof --- Dīvān-i Bayn al-Milalī-i Dādgustarī --- Dīvān-i Lāhah --- Corte internazionale di giustizia --- Kokusai Shihō Saibansho --- Sān Yuttitham rawāng Prathēt --- Maḥkamat al-ʻAdl al-Dawlīyah --- Diethnes Dikastērion --- United Nations. --- C.I.J. --- World Court --- Tribunal Internacional de Justicia --- Mezhdunarodnyĭ Sud OON --- Curtea Internațională de Justiție --- Gjykata Ndërkombëtare e Drejtësisë --- GJND --- Meǵunarodniot sud na pravdata --- Nemzetközi Bíróság --- Permanent Court of International Justice --- Permanent Court of Arbitration --- Olon Ulsyn Shu̇u̇kh --- Nėgdsėn U̇ndėstniĭ Shu̇u̇kh
Choose an application
To mark the fiftieth anniversary of the International Court of Justice, a distinguished group of international judges, practitioners and academics has undertaken a major review of its work. The chapters discuss the main areas of substantive law with which the Court has been concerned, and the more significant aspects of its practice and procedure in dealing with cases before it. It discusses the role of the Court in the international legal order, and its relationship with the UN's political organs. The thirty-three chapters are presented under five headings: the Court; the sources and evidences of international law; substance of international law; procedural aspects of the Court's work; the Court and the UN. It has been prepared in honour of Sir Robert Jennings, judge and sometime President of the Court.
International Court of Justice. --- CIJ --- Cour internationale de justice --- M.T.S. --- MTS --- Mǐędzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- Milletlerarası Adalet Divanı --- I.C.J. --- ICJ --- Hague. --- Corte Internacional de Justicia --- Internationaler Gerichtshof --- Dīvān-i Bayn al-Milalī-i Dādgustarī --- Dīvān-i Lāhah --- Corte internazionale di giustizia --- Kokusai Shihō Saibansho --- Sān Yuttitham rawāng Prathēt --- Maḥkamat al-ʻAdl al-Dawlīyah --- Diethnes Dikastērion --- United Nations. --- C.I.J. --- World Court --- Tribunal Internacional de Justicia --- Mezhdunarodnyĭ Sud OON --- Curtea Internațională de Justiție --- Gjykata Ndërkombëtare e Drejtësisë --- GJND --- Meǵunarodniot sud na pravdata --- Nemzetközi Bíróság --- Permanent Court of International Justice --- Permanent Court of Arbitration --- 341.645.2 --- International Court of Justice --- Law of international organizations --- Olon Ulsyn Shu̇u̇kh --- Nėgdsėn U̇ndėstniĭ Shu̇u̇kh --- Law --- General and Others
Choose an application
This work offers ease of access to the ICJ's judgments and advisory opinions given between 25 March 1949 and 3 February 2012. It seeks to help scholars, practitioners and students of international public law quickly to review the Court’s jurisprudence for precedents in the Court’s 'canon' and 'case law'. It allows the reader to read the judgments and opinions themselves, reduced to the unabbreviated and undistorted essence of the Court’s reasoning. The work contains all the timeless elements of the Court’s jurisprudence in one volume, and a highly detailed index of the relevant terms and phrases of the judgments and advisory opinions.
International law --- International Court of Justice. --- CIJ --- Cour internationale de justice --- M.T.S. --- MTS --- Mǐędzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- Milletlerarası Adalet Divanı --- I.C.J. --- ICJ --- Hague. --- Corte Internacional de Justicia --- Internationaler Gerichtshof --- Dīvān-i Bayn al-Milalī-i Dādgustarī --- Dīvān-i Lāhah --- Corte internazionale di giustizia --- Kokusai Shihō Saibansho --- Sān Yuttitham rawāng Prathēt --- Maḥkamat al-ʻAdl al-Dawlīyah --- Diethnes Dikastērion --- United Nations. --- C.I.J. --- World Court --- Tribunal Internacional de Justicia --- Mezhdunarodnyĭ Sud OON --- Curtea Internațională de Justiție --- Gjykata Ndërkombëtare e Drejtësisë --- GJND --- Meǵunarodniot sud na pravdata --- Nemzetközi Bíróság --- Permanent Court of International Justice --- Permanent Court of Arbitration --- Olon Ulsyn Shu̇u̇kh --- Nėgdsėn U̇ndėstniĭ Shu̇u̇kh
Choose an application
The International Court of Justice is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, and epitomizes the very notion of international judicial institution. Yet, it decides inter-State disputes only with the parties’ consent. This makes it more similar to international arbitral tribunals than other international courts. However, the permanent nature of the Court, the predetermination of procedural rules by the Statute and the Rules of Court, the public character of proceedings, the opportunity for third States to intervene in a case under Articles 62 and 63 of the Statute and the Court's role as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations mark a structural difference between the ICJ and non-institutionalized international arbitral tribunals. This book analyses if and to what extent these features have influenced the approach of the ICJ (and of the PCIJ before it) to its own judicial function and have led it to depart from the principles established in international arbitration.
International law. --- International Court of Justice. --- Law of nations --- Nations, Law of --- Public international law --- Law --- CIJ --- Cour internationale de justice --- M.T.S. --- MTS --- Mǐędzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- Milletlerarası Adalet Divanı --- I.C.J. --- ICJ --- Hague. --- Corte Internacional de Justicia --- Internationaler Gerichtshof --- Dīvān-i Bayn al-Milalī-i Dādgustarī --- Dīvān-i Lāhah --- Corte internazionale di giustizia --- Kokusai Shihō Saibansho --- Sān Yuttitham rawāng Prathēt --- Maḥkamat al-ʻAdl al-Dawlīyah --- Diethnes Dikastērion --- United Nations. --- C.I.J. --- World Court --- Tribunal Internacional de Justicia --- Mezhdunarodnyĭ Sud OON --- Curtea Internațională de Justiție --- Gjykata Ndërkombëtare e Drejtësisë --- GJND --- Meǵunarodniot sud na pravdata --- Nemzetközi Bíróság --- Permanent Court of International Justice --- Permanent Court of Arbitration --- Mediation. --- Dispute resolution (Law). --- Conflict management. --- Sources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations. --- Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration. --- Conflict control --- Conflict resolution --- Dispute settlement --- Management of conflict --- Managing conflict --- Management --- Negotiation --- Problem solving --- Social conflict --- Crisis management --- ADR (Dispute resolution) --- Alternative dispute resolution --- Appropriate dispute resolution --- Collaborative law --- Dispute processing --- Justice, Administration of --- Mediation --- Neighborhood justice centers --- Third parties (Law) --- Good offices (Mediation) --- Conflict management --- Dispute resolution (Law) --- Law and legislation
Choose an application
This volume discusses the legal limits to the authority of the Security Council under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. The interest in this topic regained importance when the Security Council started to play an increasingly active role after a period of dormancy between 1945 and 1990. The work describes various approaches to Charter interpretation, provides an overview of the Council's powers under the Charter and surveys the Council's recent practice with regard to the maintenance of international peace and security. Subsequently the sources and contents of the limits to the Council's authority are analyzed. This is followed by an analysis of the role of the International Court of Justice, which includes an overview of the main obstacles to, and possibilities of, judicial review by the Court of Council decisions taken under Chapter VII. Finally, the work discusses recent proposals to enhance the Council's legitimacy.
Security, International. --- United Nations law --- Security international. --- United Nations Charter. --- Collective security --- International security --- International relations --- Disarmament --- International organization --- Peace --- International Court of Justice. --- United Nations. --- CIJ --- Cour internationale de justice --- M.T.S. --- MTS --- Mǐędzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- Milletlerarası Adalet Divanı --- I.C.J. --- ICJ --- Hague. --- Corte Internacional de Justicia --- Internationaler Gerichtshof --- Dīvān-i Bayn al-Milalī-i Dādgustarī --- Dīvān-i Lāhah --- Corte internazionale di giustizia --- Kokusai Shihō Saibansho --- Sān Yuttitham rawāng Prathēt --- Maḥkamat al-ʻAdl al-Dawlīyah --- Diethnes Dikastērion --- C.I.J. --- World Court --- Tribunal Internacional de Justicia --- Mezhdunarodnyĭ Sud OON --- Curtea Internațională de Justiție --- Gjykata Ndërkombëtare e Drejtësisë --- GJND --- Meǵunarodniot sud na pravdata --- Nemzetközi Bíróság --- Permanent Court of International Justice --- Permanent Court of Arbitration --- Hội đồng bảo an Liên Hợp Quốc --- United Nation. --- United Nations --- Powers and duties. --- Olon Ulsyn Shu̇u̇kh --- Nėgdsėn U̇ndėstniĭ Shu̇u̇kh
Choose an application
How can Third World experiences of colonialism and statehood be expressed within the confines of the International Court of Justice? How has the discourse of international law developed to reflect postcolonial realities of ‘universal’ statehood? In a close and critical reading of four territorial disputes spanning the Arab World, Burgis explores the extent to which international law can be used to speak for and speak to non-European experiences of authority over territory. The book draws on recent, critical international legal scholarship to question the ability of contemporary, international adjudication to address Third World grievances from the past. A comparative analysis of the cases suggests that international law remains a discourse only capable of capturing a limited range of non-European experiences during and after colonialism.
Boundary disputes --- Jurisdiction (International law) --- International Court of Justice --- Boundary disputes. --- Domestic jurisdiction --- International jurisdiction --- Jurisdiction, Domestic --- Jurisdiction, International --- Arbitration (International law) --- International courts --- Border disputes --- Disputes, Boundary --- Territorial boundary disputes --- International Court of Justice. --- CIJ --- Cour internationale de justice --- M.T.S. --- MTS --- Mǐędzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- Milletlerarası Adalet Divanı --- I.C.J. --- ICJ --- Hague. --- Corte Internacional de Justicia --- Internationaler Gerichtshof --- Dīvān-i Bayn al-Milalī-i Dādgustarī --- Dīvān-i Lāhah --- Corte internazionale di giustizia --- Kokusai Shihō Saibansho --- Sān Yuttitham rawāng Prathēt --- Maḥkamat al-ʻAdl al-Dawlīyah --- Diethnes Dikastērion --- United Nations. --- C.I.J. --- World Court --- Tribunal Internacional de Justicia --- Mezhdunarodnyĭ Sud OON --- Curtea Internațională de Justiție --- Gjykata Ndërkombëtare e Drejtësisë --- GJND --- Meǵunarodniot sud na pravdata --- Nemzetközi Bíróság --- Permanent Court of International Justice --- Permanent Court of Arbitration --- Olon Ulsyn Shu̇u̇kh --- Nėgdsėn U̇ndėstniĭ Shu̇u̇kh
Choose an application
This pioneering publication provides a Reference Guide to the significant contributions of decisions of the World Court, as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations and the world's most senior Court with the broadest material jurisdiction, to the development of the law of the sea as a part of the global system of peace and security. The Guide is dedicated to the Court's former President Stephen M. Schwebel in appreciation of his belief that it is important for the Court to further explore its pre-eminently unique role throughout the Third Millennium. Whereas the format of specific entries covered by this Reference Guide largely corresponds to the Parts and Annexes of the 1982 UN Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS) and the 1994 Part XI Agreement, the heading of each entry also contains, as appropriate, references to the 1930 League of Nations Hague Draft, the four 1958 UN Geneva Conventions and the 1995 UN Straddling Stocks Agreement, as well as to the 1972 UN Stockholm, the 1992 Rio UNCED and the 2002 Johannesbourg instruments. This will enable the reader to relate the Court's decisions to the respective UNCLOS provisions as originated from and as implemented by these global framework instruments at various stages of codification and progressive development of the law of the sea. The entries cover principally Judgments and Orders (including the related pleadings) of the PCIJ and the ICJ and those decisions of Arbitral Tribunals and other third party fora as well as national courts which have been relied upon in the Court's jurisprudence. In addition, the recent decisions of the ITLOS and some other fora, such as the Annex VII Southern Bluefin Tuna, Singapore volume Malaysia, Barbados/Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana/Suriname and the Mox Plant Arbitral Tribunals, as well as references to treaties are also listed under specific entries as appropriate. Tables of Cases and Treaties will importantly facilitate the use of this Reference Guide . It has proven to be an indispensable tool for the Judges and governmental and other practitioners in furthering the coherent development of the law of the sea by international courts and tribunals on the one hand, and for international community of academics in the adequate assessing of this development on the other hand.
Law of the sea --- International Court of Justice --- International Court of Justice. --- Law of the sea - Cases --- High seas, Jurisdiction over --- Marine law --- Ocean --- Ocean law --- Sea, Law of the --- International law --- Maritime law --- Territorial waters --- Law and legislation --- CIJ --- Cour internationale de justice --- M.T.S. --- MTS --- Mǐędzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- Milletlerarası Adalet Divanı --- I.C.J. --- ICJ --- Hague. --- Corte Internacional de Justicia --- Internationaler Gerichtshof --- Dīvān-i Bayn al-Milalī-i Dādgustarī --- Dīvān-i Lāhah --- Corte internazionale di giustizia --- Kokusai Shihō Saibansho --- Sān Yuttitham rawāng Prathēt --- Maḥkamat al-ʻAdl al-Dawlīyah --- Diethnes Dikastērion --- United Nations. --- C.I.J. --- World Court --- Tribunal Internacional de Justicia --- Mezhdunarodnyĭ Sud OON --- Curtea Internațională de Justiție --- Gjykata Ndërkombëtare e Drejtësisë --- GJND --- Meǵunarodniot sud na pravdata --- Nemzetközi Bíróság --- Olon Ulsyn Shu̇u̇kh --- Nėgdsėn U̇ndėstniĭ Shu̇u̇kh --- Permanent Court of International Justice --- Permanent Court of Arbitration
Listing 1 - 10 of 23 | << page >> |
Sort by
|