Narrow your search

Library

KU Leuven (16)

Odisee (16)

Thomas More Kempen (16)

Thomas More Mechelen (16)

UCLL (16)

VIVES (16)

ULB (14)

ULiège (14)

Vlerick Business School (8)

UGent (7)

More...

Resource type

periodical (10)

book (6)


Language

English (16)


Year
From To Submit

2009 (1)

2008 (1)

2007 (3)

2005 (1)

2000 (1)

More...
Listing 1 - 10 of 16 << page
of 2
>>
Sort by

Periodical
Wireless networks: the journal of mobile communication, computation and information
Author:
ISSN: 10220038 15728196 Publisher: Amsterdam Baltzer


Periodical
Communications of the ACM
Author:
ISSN: 00010782 15577317 Year: 1958 Publisher: New York, N.Y. Association for Computing Machinery


Periodical
Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery
Author:
ISSN: 00045411 1557735X Year: 1954 Publisher: New York, N.Y.


Periodical
Software concepts & tools.
Author:
ISSN: 14322188 Year: 2000 Publisher: Berlin : Springer,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract


Periodical
ACM transactions on programming languages and systems.
Author:
ISSN: 15584593 Year: 1979 Publisher: [New York] : Association for Computing Machinery

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract


Periodical
ACM transactions on computer systems.
Author:
ISSN: 15577333 Year: 1983 Publisher: New York : Association for Computing Machinery

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Cooperative Bug Isolation : Winning Thesis of the 2005 ACM Doctoral Dissertation Competition
Authors: ---
ISBN: 9783540718772 354071877X 9786610865727 1280865725 3540718788 Year: 2007 Publisher: Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg : Imprint: Springer,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Efforts to understand and predict the behavior of software date back to the earliest days of computer programming,over half a century ago. In the intervening decades, the need for effective methods of understanding software has only increased; so- ware has spread to become the underpinning of much of modern society, and the potentially disastrous consequences of broken or poorly understood software have become all too apparent. Ben Liblit’s work reconsiders two common assumptions about how we should analyze software and it arrives at some striking new results. Inprinciple,understandingsoftware is not such a hardproblem. Certainlya c- puter scientist studying programs appears to be in a much stronger position than, say, a biologist trying to understand a living organism or an economist trying to understand the behavior of markets, because the biologist and the economist must rely on indirect observation of the basic processes they wish to understand. A c- puterscientist, however,starts with a complete,precise descriptionof the behaviorof software—the program itself! Of course, the story turns out not to be so straightf- ward, because despite having a perfect description, programs are suf ciently c- plex that it is usually dif cult or even impossible to answer many simple questions about them.

Listing 1 - 10 of 16 << page
of 2
>>
Sort by