Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Philosophy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Philonsorbonne est la revue de l’École Doctorale de Philosophie de l’université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, créée en partenariat avec les Publications de la Sorbonne qui en ont édité une version papier jusqu'en 2013. Elle a pour vocation principale de publier les textes des doctorants ou d’étudiants de Master dont l’excellence est reconnue et, le cas échéant, les travaux de chercheurs confirmés, notamment de professeurs invités, qui interviennent dans le cadre des activités de l’École Doctorale de Philosophie. Son objectif est de permettre aux jeunes chercheurs de faire connaître leurs travaux et de refléter le rayonnement de l’École Doctorale et de ses diverses composantes dans les domaines de l’histoire de la philosophie ancienne et moderne, de la philosophie contemporaine, de la logique, de l’histoire et de la philosophie des sciences, de la philosophie morale et politique, de la philosophie de l’art et de l’esthétique.

Philosophy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Philosophy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Philosophy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

It's clear that "philosophy" comes from the Greek "philosophia," love of wisdom. What is not at all clear is what that phrase means. In the connection it articulates between love and wisdom, what, precisely, does philosophy name?This small book, or extended essay, is divided into three sections. The first section (What is Philosophy?) takes seriously Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari's contention in their book of the same title that, "The nonphilosophical is perhaps closer to the heart of philosophy than philosophy itself, and this means that philosophy cannot be content to be understood only philosophically or conceptually, but is essentially addressed to nonphilosophers as well?" (including the nonphilosopher in every philosopher). The second section (On Argument) interrogates the status and value of evidence, and self-evidence. The third section (On Not Knowing) generalizes a parenthetical observation of Agamben's on Heidegger, "If we may attempt to identify something like the characteristic Stimmung of every thinker, perhaps it is precisely this being delivered over to something that refuses itself that defines the specific emotional tonality of Heidegger's thought": Might not philosophy be defined, the phil of sophia, precisely, as what it is to be delivered over to something that refuses itself? That is precisely what this small explores.

Philosophy.