Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Le droit à la liberté d’expression entraîne des devoirs et des responsabilités, et il est soumis à certaines limites, prévues à l’article 10 paragraphe 2 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme, qui peuvent notamment tenir à la protection des droits d’autrui. L’identification d’actes pouvant être qualifiés de «discours de haine» apparaît d’autant plus difficile que ce type de discours n’implique pas nécessairement l’expression d’une haine ou d’émotions. Se fondant sur l’ensemble des textes applicables en matière de liberté d’expression ainsi que sur la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme et d’autres organes, l’auteur dégage certains paramètres permettant de distinguer les expressions qui, bien que parfois insultantes, sont pleinement protégées par le droit à la liberté d’expression de celles qui ne bénéficient pas de cette protection.

Hate speech --- Human rights --- Propagande haineuse --- Droits de l'homme (Droit international) --- Law and legislation --- Droit --- Freedom of speech --- Hate speech - Europe --- Freedom of speech - Europe

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A fundamental precept of all liberal democracies is a commitment to free speech. However, democracies differ fundamentally when addressing the constitutionality of laws regulating certain kinds of speech. In the United States, the commitment to free speech in the First Amendment has been held by the Supreme Court to protect the public expression of the most noxious racist ideology and hence to render unconstitutional even narrow restrictions on hate speech. In contrast, governments have been accorded considerable leeway to restrict racist and other extreme expression in almost every other democracy, including Canada, the United Kingdom and other European countries. This book considers the constitutionality of hate speech regulation, and examines how liberal democracies have adopted fundamental differences in the way they respond to racist or extreme expressions. What accounts for the marked differences in attitude towards the constitutionality of hate speech regulation? Does hate speech regulation violate the core free speech principle constitutive of democracy? Has the traditional US position on extreme expressions justifiably not found favour elsewhere? Should, or could, other values such as the commitment to equality or dignity legitimately override the right to free speech in some circumstances? This collection of papers from some of the top free speech thinkers and writers today attempts to analyse and answer some of these fundamental questions that confront liberal democracies faced with extreme expressions.

Freedom of speech --- Hate speech --- Freedom of speech. --- Hate speech. --- Defamation against groups --- Group defamation --- Group libel --- Racist speech --- Speech, Hate --- Libel and slander --- Free speech --- Liberty of speech --- Speech, Freedom of --- Civil rights --- Freedom of expression --- Assembly, Right of --- Freedom of information --- Intellectual freedom --- Law and legislation

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Misogyny Online' explores the worldwide phenomenon of gendered cyberhate as a significant discourse which has been overlooked and marginalised. The rapid growth of the internet has led to numerous opportunities and benefits; however, the architecture of the cybersphere offers users unprecedented opportunities to engage in hate speech. A leading international researcher in this field, Emma A. Jane weaves together data and theory from multiple disciplines and expresses her findings in a style that is engaging, witty and powerful. Misogyny Online is an important read for students and faculty members alike across the social sciences and humanities.

Social problems --- Sociology of the family. Sociology of sexuality --- Misogyny. --- Mass media --- Online hate speech --- Cyberbullying --- Internet and women --- Sexual harassment of women --- Research --- Mass media - Research --- Misogyny --- Criminology. Victimology

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Cet ouvrage s'inscrit dans le projet « ALADIN », initié et dirigé par Raphaël Maurel à partir de septembre 2022 au sein du CREDIMI et visant à analyser l'hypothèse de l'émergence d'un droit international consacré à l'objet « numérique ».À ce titre, le projet met l'accent sur l'identification des « institutions » présentes dans l'espace numérique et d'éventuels ordres juridiques transnationaux.L'ouvrage explore l'hypothèse selon laquelle le pluralisme institutionnel hérité de Santi Romano est ici pertinent et permet de mieux comprendre les pratiques normatives des entreprises qui gèrent les réseaux sociaux (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Snapchat, TikTok, Twitch, Twitter, WeChat, Youtube, etc.).

Droit transnational. --- Réseaux sociaux (Internet) --- Surveillance électronique. --- Droit. --- Aspect politique. --- Politique publique. --- Droit transnational --- Réseaux sociaux (Internet) --- Surveillance électronique --- Social media --- Médias sociaux --- Social networks --- Réseaux sociaux --- Law and legislation. --- Droit --- Transnational law --- Online dispute resolution --- Règlement de conflits en ligne --- Online hate speech --- Propagande haineuse sur internet --- Contracts --- Contrats --- Social networks. --- Réseaux sociaux