Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Communication in politics. --- Internet --- Comunicación en política. --- Political aspects. --- Aspectos políticos. --- Comunicación en Política. --- Aspectos Políticos.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"For the last several decades an influential group of Egyptian scholars and public intellectuals has been having a profound effect in the Islamic world. Raymond Baker offers a portrait of these New Islamists - Islamic scholars, lawyers, judges, and journalists who provide the moral and intellectual foundations for a more fully realized Islamic community, open to the world and with full rights of active citizenship for women and non-Muslims." "The New Islamists have a record of constructive engagement in Egyptian public life, balanced by an unequivocal critique of the excesses of Islamist extremists. Baker shows how the New Islamists are translating their thinking into action in education and the arts, economics and social life, and politics and foreign relations despite an authoritarian political environment." "For the first time, Baker allows us to hear in context the most important New Islamist voices, including Muhammad al Ghazzaly, Kamal Abul Magd, Muhammad Selim al Awa, Fahmy Huwaidy, Tareq al Bishry, and Yusuf al Qaradawy - regarded by some as the most influential Islamic scholar in the world today."--Jacket.

Islam and politics --- Religious awakening --- Secularism --- Islam et politique --- Réveil religieux --- Sécularisation --- Egypt --- Egypte --- Politics and government --- Politique et gouvernement --- Islam and politics. --- Islam. --- Islamismo (aspectos políticos) --- Politics and government. --- Politieke ontwikkeling. --- Religion --- Religious awakening. --- Secularisatie (maatschappij). --- Secularism. --- Secularização --- Sozialphilosophie. --- Sozialpolitik. --- 1981-2011. --- Egito (Cultura;Sociedade;PolÍtica) --- Egypt. --- Ägypten.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Is social media destroying democracy? Are Russian propaganda or "Fake news" entrepreneurs on Facebook undermining our sense of a shared reality? A conventional wisdom has emerged since the election of Donald Trump in 2016 that new technologies and their manipulation by foreign actors played a decisive role in his victory and are responsible for the sense of a "post-truth" moment in which disinformation and propaganda thrives. Network Propaganda challenges that received wisdom through the most comprehensive study yet published on media coverage of American presidential politics from the start of the election cycle in April 2015 to the one year anniversary of the Trump presidency. Analysing millions of news stories together with Twitter and Facebook shares, broadcast television and YouTube, the book provides a comprehensive overview of the architecture of contemporary American political communications. Through data analysis and detailed qualitative case studies of coverage of immigration, Clinton scandals, and the Trump Russia investigation, the book finds that the right-wing media ecosystem operates fundamentally differently than the rest of the media environment. The authors argue that longstanding institutional, political, and cultural patterns in American politics interacted with technological change since the 1970s to create a propaganda feedback loop in American conservative media. This dynamic has marginalized centre-right media and politicians, radicalized the right wing ecosystem, and rendered it susceptible to propaganda efforts, foreign and domestic. For readers outside the United States, the book offers a new perspective and methods for diagnosing the sources of, and potential solutions for, the perceived global crisis of democratic politics

Presidents --- Communication in politics --- Political campaigns --- Mass media --- Social media --- Internet in political campaigns --- Disinformation --- Radicalism --- Political culture --- Election --- Political aspects --- History --- Unted States --- United States --- Politics and government --- Extremism, Political --- Ideological extremism --- Political extremism --- Political science --- Deception --- Intelligence service --- Presidency --- Heads of state --- Executive power --- User-generated media --- Communication --- User-generated content --- Political sociology --- Mass communications --- Comunicación --- Presidentes --- Medios de comunicación --- Redes sociales --- Política cultural --- Política --- Elecciones --- Aspectos políticos --- Estados Unidos --- Política gubernamental --- Online manipulation --- Presidents - United States - Election - 2016 --- Communication in politics - United States --- Political campaigns - United States --- Mass media - Political aspects - United States --- Social media - Political aspects - United States --- Internet in political campaigns - United States --- Disinformation - United States - History - 21st century --- Radicalism - United States --- Political culture - United States --- Unted States - Politics and government - 2009-2017 --- United States - Politics and government - 2017 --- -Presidents --- United States of America

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"In early 2012, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh claimed that Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University law student who advocated for insurance coverage of contraceptives, "wants to be paid to have sex." Over the next few days, Limbaugh attacked Fluke personally, often in crude terms, while a powerful backlash grew, led by organizations such as the National Organization for Women. But perhaps what was most notable about the incident was that it wasn't unusual. From Limbaugh's venomous attacks on Fluke to liberal radio host Mike Malloy's suggestion that Bill O'Reilly "drink a vat of poison ... and choke to death," over-the-top discourse in today's political opinion media is pervasive. Anyone who observes the skyrocketing number of incendiary political opinion shows on television and radio might conclude that political vitriol on the airwaves is fueled by the increasingly partisan American political system. But in The Outrage Industry Jeffrey M. Berry and Sarah Sobieraj show how the proliferation of outrage-the provocative, hyperbolic style of commentary delivered by hosts like Ed Schultz, Bill O'Reilly, and Sean Hannity- says more about regulatory, technological, and cultural changes, than it does about our political inclinations. Berry and Sobieraj tackle the mechanics of outrage rhetoric, exploring its various forms such as mockery, emotional display, fear mongering, audience flattery, and conspiracy theories. They then investigate the impact of outrage rhetoric-which stigmatizes cooperation and brands collaboration and compromise as weak-on a contemporary political landscape that features frequent straight-party voting in Congress. Outrage tactics have also facilitated the growth of the Tea Party, a movement which appeals to older, white conservatives and has dragged the GOP farther away from the demographically significant moderates whose favor it should be courting. Finally, The Outrage Industry examines how these shows sour our own political lives, exacerbating anxieties about political talk and collaboration in our own communities. Drawing from a rich base of evidence, this book forces all of us to consider the negative consequences that flow from our increasingly hyper-partisan political media"--

Television and politics --- Television in politics --- Mass media --- Mass media and public opinion --- Political culture --- Television viewers --- Télévision et politique --- Television en politique --- Médias --- Médias et opinion publique --- Culture politique --- Téléspectateurs --- Political aspects --- Attitudes --- Aspect politique --- United States --- Etats-Unis --- Politics and government --- In mass media --- Politique et gouvernement --- Dans les médias --- Télévision et politique --- Médias --- Médias et opinion publique --- Téléspectateurs --- Dans les médias --- U.S.A. --- Jungtinės Amerikos valstybės --- Soedinennye Shtaty Si︠e︡vernoĭ Ameriki --- Soedinennye Shtaty Severnoĭ Ameriki --- Si︠e︡vero-Amerikanskīe Soedinennye Shtaty --- Severo-Amerikanskie Soedinennye Shtaty --- Zlucheni Derz︠h︡avy --- USA --- US --- Arhab --- Ar. ha-B. --- Artsot ha-Berit --- ولايات المتحدة الامريكية --- Wilāyāt al-Muttaḥidah al-Amirīkīyah --- ABSh --- Amerika Birlăshmish Shtatlary --- ABŞ --- Amerika Birlăşmi Ştatları --- Forente stater --- Spojené staty americké --- Severo-Amerikanskie Shtaty --- Sjedinjene Američke Države --- Zʹi︠e︡dnani Derz︠h︡avy Ameryky --- Amerikai Egyesült Államok --- Yhdysvallat --- Verenigde Staten --- Egyesült Államok --- Hiwsisayin Amerikayi Miatsʻeal Tērutʻiwnkʻ --- Estados Unidos de América --- United States of America --- Fareyniḳṭe Shṭaṭn --- Artzois Ha'bris --- Estados Unidos da América do Norte --- SShA --- Soedinennye Shtaty Ameriki --- VSA --- États-Unis d'Amérique --- Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika --- Stati Uniti d'America --- Estados Unidos --- EE.UU. --- Stany Zjednoczone --- ĒPA --- Amerika Qūrama Shtattary --- Amerika Qŭshma Shtatlari --- SAD --- Saharat ʻAmērikā --- Hēnomenai Politeiai Amerikēs --- ZSA --- Mei-kuo --- Meiguo --- Mei guo --- ZDA --- Združene države Amerike --- U.S. --- America (Republic) --- Amirika Carékat --- Verenigde State van Amerika --- VS --- ولايات المتحدة --- Wilāyāt al-Muttaḥidah --- ولايات المتّحدة الأمريكيّة --- Wilāyāt al-Muttaḥidah al-Amrīkīyah --- Estatos Unitos --- Estatos Unitos d'America --- Ètats-Unis d'Amèrica --- Estaos Xuníos d'América --- Estaos Xuníos --- Tetã peteĩ reko Amérikagua --- Istadus Unidus --- Amerika Birlăşmiş Ştatları --- Amerika ka Kelenyalen Jamanaw --- Bí-kok --- Amerika Qushma Shtattary --- AQSh --- Злучаныя Штаты Амерыкі --- Zluchanyi︠a︡ Shtaty Ameryki --- Yunaeted Stet blong Amerika --- Yunaeted Stet --- Vaeinigte Staatn --- Vaeinigte Staatn vo Amerika --- Stadoù-Unanet Amerika --- Sŭedineni amerikanski shtati --- САЩ --- SASht --- Съединените щати --- Sŭedinenite shtati --- Америка (Republic) --- Amerika (Republic) --- Estats Units d'Amèrica --- Америкӑри Пӗрлешӳллӗ Штатсем --- Amerikări Pĕrleshu̇llĕ Shtatsem --- Stati Uniti --- SUA (Stati Uniti d'America) --- Unol Daleithiau America --- Unol Daleithiau --- Amerikas Forenede Stater --- Vereinigte Staaten --- Wááshindoon Bikéyah Ałhidadiidzooígíí --- Zjadnośone staty Ameriki --- Ameerika Ühendriigid --- Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες της Αμερικής --- Hēnōmenes Politeies tēs Amerikēs --- Η.Π.Α. --- Ē.P.A. --- Usono --- Unuiĝintaj Ŝtatoj de Ameriko --- Американь Вейтьсэндявкс Штаттнэ --- Amerikanʹ Veĭtʹsėndi︠a︡vks Shtattnė --- Ameriketako Estatu Batuak --- Feriene Steaten --- Feriene Steaten fan Amearika --- FS --- Stâts Unîts di Americhe --- Stâts Unîts --- Stáit Aontaithe Mheiriceá --- Steatyn Unnaneysit America --- Steatyn Unnaneysit --- S.U.A. --- Na Stàitean Aonaichte --- NSA --- Mî-koet --- 미국 --- Miguk --- Amerikayi Miatsʻyal Nahangner --- Miatsʻyal Nahangner --- In mass media. --- Public opinion. --- Audiences, Television --- Television audiences --- Television fans --- Television watchers --- Viewers, Television --- Audiences --- #SBIB:324H60 --- #SBIB:324H50 --- #SBIB:309H271 --- Politieke socialisatie --- Politieke participatie en legitimiteit (referenda, directe democratie, publieke opinie...) --- Politieke communicatie: toepassingsgebieden --- Attitudes. --- 21st century --- Public opinion --- Ontwikkelingspsychologie --- Sociologie van de politiek --- Massacommunicatie --- Pragmatiek --- Psycholinguïstiek --- Verenigde Staten van Amerika --- Developmental psychology --- Political sociology --- Mass communications --- Pragmatics --- Psycholinguistics --- Американь Вейтьсэндявкс Штаттнэ --- Medios de comunicación de masas --- Política cultural --- Televidente --- Aspectos políticos --- Politica gubernamental --- Medios de comunicación --- Política gubernamental --- Opinión pública --- Spojené obce severoamerické --- États-Unis --- É.-U. --- ÉU