Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

It is routinely assumed that residents of post-socialist countries have a preference for greater income equality, other things being equal, owing to the legacy of socialism. This proposition is examined in the context of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union using data from three waves of the World Values Survey. Contrary to expectations, the authors find little evidence of a 'socialist legacy' en bloc. Considering the former Soviet Union separately from other post-socialist countries, the analysis finds that as a group these countries display significantly lower preference for moving toward greater income equality than both Eastern Europe and other comparator groups (developed and developing countries). These findings hold up even when controlling for the conventional determinants of attitudes such as income level and employment status of the individual respondent, as well as national factors such as per-capita income and its distribution. Moreover, the preference for greater income inequality appears to have persisted at least since the mid-1990s and possibly since the early 1990s (data difficulties preclude a robust examination of this latter question). The results are consistent with the fairly low levels of public spending on redistribution commonly found in the former Soviet Union.

Corporate Law --- Country Strategy and Performance --- Developing countries --- Equal countries --- Gender --- Gender and Law --- Gini coefficient --- Income --- Income inequality --- Income level --- Inequality --- Labor market --- Law and Development --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Policy Research --- Poverty Impact Evaluation --- Poverty Reduction --- Public spending

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This paper revisits the early empirical literature on economic growth in transition economies, with particular focus on fiscal policy variables-fiscal balance and the size of government. The baseline model uses a parsimonious specification, drawn from Fischer and Sahay (2000), of economic growth as a function of initial conditions, stabilization, liberalization, and structural reform. The paper expands the data used in previous analyses by up to 10 years and finds unambiguous evidence that fiscal balance matters for growth, while confirming other previous findings on the correlates of economic growth in transition economies. In addition, the paper extends the baseline model and explores potential sources of nonlinearities in the relationship between growth and public finance. A key finding is that determinants of growth may vary in relative importance, depending on the underlying institutional quality. The evidence indicates that there could be higher growth payoffs from macroeconomic stability and public expenditure in countries characterized by relatively better public sector governance as measured by relevant indicators. In addition, the size of government matters for growth in a nonlinear manner: Beyond indicative thresholds of expenditure levels, public spending has a negative impact, while at levels below the threshold, there is no measurable impact on economic growth.

Economic growth --- Fiscal balance --- Fiscal policy --- Governance --- Governance Indicators --- Macroeconomic stability --- National Governance --- Poverty Reduction --- Pro-Poor Growth --- Public expenditure --- Public Finance --- Public sector --- Public Sector Economics and Finance --- Public Sector Expenditure Analysis and Management --- Size of government --- Structural reform --- Transition Economies

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Public spending has effects which are complex to trace and difficult to quantify. But the composition of public expenditure has become the key instrument by which development agencies seek to promote economic development. In recent years, the development assistance to heavily indebted poor countries (HIPCs) has been made conditional on increased expenditure on categories that are thought to be "pro-poor". This paper responds to the growing concern being expressed about the conceptual foundations and the empirical basis for the belief that poverty can be reduced through targeted public spending. While it is widely accepted that growth and redistribution are important sources of reduction in absolute poverty, a review of the literature confirms the lack of an appropriate theoretical framework for assessing the impact of public spending on growth as well as poverty. There is a need to combine principles of both public economics and growth theory to develop appropriate theoretical guidance for public expenditure policy. This paper identifies a number of approaches that are beginning to address this gap. Building on these approaches, it proposes a framework that has its foundation in a broadly articulated development strategy and its economic goals such as growth, equity, and poverty reduction. It recommends the use of public economics principles to clarify the roles of the private and public sectors and to recognize the complementarity of spending, taxation, and regulatory instruments available to affect public policy. With regard to the impact of any given type of public spending, policy recommendations must be tailored to countries and be based on empirical analysis that takes account of the lags and leads in their effects on equity and growth and ultimately on poverty. The paper sketches out such a framework as the first step in what will have to be a longer-term research agenda to provide theoretically and empirically robust and verifiable guidance to public spending policy.

Absolute Poverty --- Agricultural Development --- Debt Markets --- Economic Growth --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial Literacy --- Human Development --- Poor --- Poor Countries --- Poverty --- Poverty Monitoring and Analysis --- Poverty Reduction --- Poverty Reduction Strategy --- Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers --- Pro-Poor Growth --- Public Sector Economics and Finance --- Public Sector Expenditure Analysis and Management --- Public Spending --- Rural --- Rural Development --- Rural Poverty Reduction --- Safety Nets --- Savings --- Services and Transfers to Poor --- Social Policies --- Social Spending --- Structural Reforms --- Sustainable Poverty Reduction --- War

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This paper looks at how individual preferences for the allocation of government spending change along the life cycle. Using the Life in Transition Survey II for 34 countries in Europe and Central Asia, the study finds that older individuals are less likely to support a rise in government outlays on education and more likely to support increases in spending on pensions. These results are very similar across countries, and they do not change when using alternative model specifications, estimation methods, and data sources. Using repeated cross-sections, the analysis controls for cohort effects and confirms the main results. The findings are consistent with a body of literature arguing that conflict across generations over the allocation of public expenditures may intensify in ageing economies.

Ageing --- Cohort Effects --- Debt Markets --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Health Monitoring & Evaluation --- Health, Nutrition and Population --- Population Policies --- Public Spending --- Science and Technology Development --- Scientific Research & Science Parks