Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Synoptic problem. --- Bible. --- Bible. --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Language, style.
Choose an application
Synoptic problem --- Bible --- Language, style --- Judaea (Region) --- 800:316 --- 22.02*1 --- 22.02*2 --- Sociolinguistiek --- Bijbelse filologie: hebreeuws --- Bijbelse filologie: aramees --- Synoptic problem. --- Language and languages. --- Bible. --- Language, style. --- 22.02*2 Bijbelse filologie: aramees --- 22.02*1 Bijbelse filologie: hebreeuws --- 800:316 Sociolinguistiek --- Judaea (Region).
Choose an application
Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem. --- Document Q (Critique biblique) --- Bible. N.T. Évangiles synoptiques --- Jesus Christ --- Historicity. --- Bible. --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Synoptic problem --- Historicity --- Bible --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- 226.1 --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Bible. N.T. Évangiles synoptiques --- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism). --- Jesus Christ - Historicity
Choose an application
Synoptic problem --- Bible --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- 226.1 --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Bible. --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Synoptic problem.
Choose an application
There has recently been strong support for the hypothesis that, contrary to the formerly accepted view that Mark's gospel was the first to be written, Mark was in fact the last synoptic gospel to appear. This book is a detailed examination of the arguments used to support this view, which constitutes a revival of that put forward by J. J. Griesbach at the end of the eighteenth century. Since Markan priority and the Two-Document hypothesis have been basic presuppositions for much modern gospel study, all attempts to question them must be taken very seriously. Dr Tuckett does this by investigating the redactional activity each hypothesis presupposes, and by then asking which source theory provides the most rational and consistent account of the redactional process.
Synoptic problem --- Bible --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- 226.1 --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Bible. --- Marco (Book of the New Testament) --- Mark (Book of the New Testament) --- Markus (Book of the New Testament) --- Markusevangelium --- Vangelo di Marco --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Book of Mark --- Arts and Humanities --- Religion --- Synoptic problem.
Choose an application
Anyone who reads the Gospels carefully will notice that there are differences in the manner in which they report the same events. These differences have led many conservative Christians to resort to harmonization efforts that are often quite strained, sometimes to the point of absurdity. Many people have concluded the Gospels are hopelessly contradictory and therefore historically unreliable as accounts of Jesus. The majority of New Testament scholars now hold that most if not all of the Gospels belong to the genre of Greco-Roman biography and that this genre permitted some flexibility in the way in which historical events were narrated. However, few scholars have undertaken a robust discussion of how this plays out in Gospel pericopes (self-contained passages). Why Are There Differences in the Gospels? provides a fresh approach to the question by examining the works of Plutarch, a Greek essayist who lived in the first and second centuries CE. Michael R. Licona discovers three-dozen pericopes narrated two or more times in Plutarch's Lives, identifies differences between the accounts, and analyzes these differences in light of compositional devices identified by classical scholars as commonly employed by ancient authors. The book then applies the same approach to nineteen pericopes that are narrated in two or more Gospels, demonstrating that the major differences found there likely result from the same compositional devices employed by Plutarch. Showing both the strained harmonizations and the hasty dismissals of the Gospels as reliable accounts to be misguided, Licona invites readers to approach them in light of their biographical genre and in that way to gain a clearer understanding of why they differ.
Synoptic problem. --- 226.1 --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Plutarch. --- Plutarchus. --- Bible. --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Synoptische Frage. --- Plutarchus, --- Bibel. --- Lives (Plutarch). --- Synoptic problem
Choose an application
In Verbal Aspect in Synoptic Parallels Wally Cirafesi answers the question of why the Synoptic Gospels at times employ different tense-forms to communicate the same action. The problem has typically been explained from the perspective of redaction criticism and temporal Aktionsart approaches to the Greek verbesserte Cirafesi challenges these approaches by reframing the discussion in terms of recent advances in verbal aspect theory and discourse analysis. He convincingly demonstrates that such differences in tense-form usage have to do with how each Gospel writer wishes to construct their discourses according to various levels of linguistic prominence.
Synoptic problem. --- Greek language, Biblical --- Aspect. --- Tense. --- Usage. --- Bible. --- Language, style. --- Synoptic problem --- 225.02*3 --- 226.1 --- Biblical Greek --- New Testament Greek --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 225.02*3 Nieuw Testament: Griekse bijbelse filologie --- Nieuw Testament: Griekse bijbelse filologie --- Aspect --- Tense --- Usage --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament)
Choose an application
In 1776 Johann Jakob Griesbach of Jena published as a separate volume his Greek Synopsis of Matthew, Mark and Luke, previously issued as part of his critical edition of the Greek New Testament. He was in fact the first to establish the Synopsis as a fundamental tool of New Testament research. He was perhaps even more important for his text-critical studies, and for what is still called the Griesbach Hypothesis of the literary dependence of Mark on both Matthew and Luke. The editors of this volume have brought together a selection of the papers presented by a distinguished international group of biblical scholars at the Griesbach Bicentenary Colloquium held in Munster (Westphalia) in 1976. This collection provides an authoritative account of the life of Griesbach, and of his work and its continuing influence in the fields of the Greek Synopsis, the Synoptic Problem and text criticism of the New Testament.
Synoptic problem --- Griesbach, Jo Jac, --- Bible --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- Criticism, Textual --- 226.1 --- -#GROL:SEMI-225<08> Soci 34 --- #GROL:SEMI-226.1 --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Congresses --- Griesbach, Johann Jakob --- -Congresses --- Conferences - Meetings --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- #GROL:SEMI-225<08> Soci 34 --- Griesbach, Jo. Jac., --- Griesbach, Johann Jakob, --- Bible. --- Ba-yon Tipan --- Bagong Tipan --- Jaji ma Hungi --- Kainē Diathēkē --- New Testament --- Nouveau Testament --- Novo Testamento --- Novum Testamentum --- Novyĭ Zavet --- Novyĭ Zavi︠e︡t Gospoda nashego Īisusa Khrista --- Novyĭ Zavit --- Nuevo Testamento --- Nuovo Testamento --- Nye Testamente --- Perjanjian Baru --- Dhamma sacʻ kyamʻʺ --- Injīl --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Arts and Humanities --- Religion --- Synoptic problem - Congresses --- Griesbach, Jo Jac, - 1745-1812 - Congresses --- Griesbach, Jo Jac, - 1745-1812
Choose an application
This is the first book to examine the Aramaic dimension of Q since the Aramaic Dead Sea scrolls made such work more feasible. Maurice Casey gives a detailed examination of key passages in Matthew and Luke's gospels, demonstrating that they used two different Greek translations of an Aramaic source, which can be reconstructed. He overturns the conventional model of Q as a single Greek document, and shows that Jesus said everything in the original Aramaic source. Further analysis of other gospel passages shows the evangelists editing a Greek translation of an Aramaic source. On one, it can be shown that Mark utilises a different Aramaic source. A complex model of Q is thus proposed. Casey argues that Aramaic sources behind part of Q are of extremely early date, and should contribute significantly to the quest for the historical Jesus.
Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Aramaic literature --- Relation to the New Testament. --- Document Q (Critique biblique) --- Hypothèse Q (Exégèse des synoptiques) --- Jésus-Christ--Logia --- Logia (Critique biblique) --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q [Tradition ] --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Quelle-hypothese (Exegese van de synoptici) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Source Q (Critique biblique) --- Tradition Q --- 226.1 --- -Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Middle Eastern literature --- Relation to the New Testament --- Arts and Humanities --- Religion --- Aramaic literature - Relation to the New Testament.
Choose an application
Bible NT. Gospels. Luke --- Bible NT. Gospels. Matthew --- Bible NT. Gospels. Mark --- Synoptic problem --- Bible. N.T. Évangiles synoptiques --- Bible. N.T. Matthew --- Bible. --- Bible. N.T. Mark --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- Bible --- 226.1 --- Academic collection --- #GROL:SEMI-226.1 --- #GGSB: Exegese N.T. --- #GGSB: Synoptici --- #GGSB: Tekstkritiek N.T. --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Bible. N.T. Évangiles synoptiques --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- #GGSB: Exegese N.T --- #GGSB: Tekstkritiek N.T --- Evangelie volgens Matteus --- Evangelie volgens Matthéüs --- Matʻae pogŭm --- Matai den --- Matai ni yoru fukuinsho --- Matius (Book of the New Testament) --- Mattá --- Matteo (Book of the New Testament) --- Matteus --- Matthäusevangelium --- Matthéüs --- Matthew (Book of the New Testament) --- Matthieu (Book of the New Testament) --- Marco (Book of the New Testament) --- Mark (Book of the New Testament) --- Markus (Book of the New Testament) --- Markusevangelium --- Vangelo di Marco --- Luc (Book of the New Testament) --- Lucas (Book of the New Testament) --- Luka (Book of the New Testament) --- Lukan săn zăn︠g︡g (Book of the New Testament) --- Lukas (Book of the New Testament) --- Luke (Book of the New Testament) --- Lūqā (Book of the New Testament) --- Nuga pogŭm (Book of the New Testament) --- Ruka den --- Ruka ni yoru fukuinsho --- 226 --- Book of Mark --- Exegese N.T --- Synoptici --- Tekstkritiek N.T --- BIBLIA N.T. MARCOS --- BIBLIA N.T. MATEO --- CUESTION SINOPTICA. --- Problème synoptique. --- Synoptic problem. --- Synoptisch probleem. --- Synoptische Frage. --- CRITICA E INTERPRETACION. --- CRITITCA E INTERPRETACION. --- Critique, interprétation, etc.
Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|