Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

86.45 military criminal law, military disciplinary jurisdiction. --- Duels. --- Militair straf- en tuchtrecht. --- Military criminal law. --- Nederland.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Military law --- Humanitarian law --- Peacekeeping forces --- Intervention (International law) --- War (International law) --- Military law. --- Armed Forces --- Law, Military --- Military administration --- National security --- Law and legislation

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

344 --- Obedience --- Military ethics --- Military discipline --- Military law --- Armed Forces --- Law, Military --- Military administration --- National security --- Armies --- Discipline, Military --- Disciplinary power --- Discipline --- Ethics --- Conduct of life --- Bijzonder strafrecht --(algemeen) --- Law and legislation --- Military discipline. --- Military ethics. --- Military law. --- Obedience. --- 344 Bijzonder strafrecht --(algemeen)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Military justice systems across the world are in a state of transition. These changes are due to a combination of both domestic and international legal pressures. The domestic influences include constitutional principles, bills of rights and the presence of increasingly strong oversight bodies such as parliamentary committees. Military justice has also come under pressure from international law, particularly when applied on operations. The common theme in these many different influences is the growing role of external legal principles and institutions on military justice. This book provides insights from both scholars and practitioners on reforms to military justice in individual countries (including the UK, Canada, the Netherlands and Australia) and in wider regions (for example, South Asia and Latin America). It also analyses the impact of 'civilianisation', the changing nature of operations and the decisions of domestic and international courts on efforts to reform military justice.

Courts-martial and courts of inquiry. --- Military courts. --- Military law. --- Armed Forces --- Law, Military --- Military administration --- National security --- Military commissions --- Military government courts --- Military tribunals --- Courts --- Martial law --- Court martial --- Courts-martial and courts of inquiry --- Courts of inquiry --- Inquiry, Courts of --- Military justice --- Criminal courts --- Military law --- Naval law --- Law and legislation

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The Department of Defense has developed new sensor technologies to support military forces operating in Iraq and Afghanistan. These new capabilities may be useful in counterdrug operations along the southern U.S. border. DoD has held technology demonstrations to test and demonstrate new technologies along the southern border, because the field conditions along the border closely resemble those in current military theaters of operation and because they can also reveal whether new technologies are useful for CD operations led by domestic law enforcement agencies. However, there are legal questions about whether such technology demonstrations fully comply with U.S. law and whether advanced DoD sensors can legally be used in domestic CD operations when they are operated by U.S. military forces. In this report, the authors examine federal law and DoD policy to answer these questions. Some parts of U.S. law mandate information sharing among federal departments and agencies for national security purposes and direct DoD to play a key role in domestic CD operations in support of U.S. law enforcement agencies, while other parts of the law place restrictions on when the U.S. military may participate in law enforcement operations. Reviewing relevant federal law and DoD policy, the authors conclude that there is no legal reason why a DoD sensor should be excluded from use in an interagency technology demonstration or in an actual CD operation as long as a valid request for support is made by an appropriate law enforcement official and so long as no personally identifiable or private information is collected. The authors recommend DoD policy on domestic CD operations be formally clarified and that an approval process should be established for technology demonstrations with a CD nexus.

Military law --- Civil-military relations --- Border security --- Interagency coordination --- Drug traffic --- Law - U.S. --- Law, Politics & Government --- Military Law - U.S. --- Technological innovations --- Law and legislation --- Prevention --- Border control --- Border management --- Boundaries --- Cross-border security --- Military and civilian power --- Military-civil relations --- Armed Forces --- Law, Military --- Military administration --- Security measures --- National security --- Executive power --- Sociology, Military --- Military government --- United States --- Judicial aspects --- DoD --- Department of Defense --- American borders --- Drug smugglers, traffickers --- Trafficking --- Early 21st century