Listing 1 - 8 of 8 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Where is film analysis at today? What is cinema theory up to, behind our backs? The field, as professionally defined (at least in the Anglo-American academic world), is presently divided between contextual historians who turn to broad formations of modernity, and stylistic connoisseurs who call for a return to old-fashioned things like authorial vision, tone, and mise en scene. But there are other, vital, inventive currents happening -- in criticism, on the Internet, in small magazines, and renegade conferences everywhere -- which we are not hearing much about in any official way. Last Day Every Day shines a light on one of these exciting new avenues. Is there a way to bring together, in a refreshed manner, textual logic, hermeneutic interpretation, theoretical speculation, and socio-political history? A way to break the deadlock between classical approaches that sought organic coherence in film works, and poststructuralist approaches that exposed the heterogeneity of all texts and scattered the pieces to the four winds? A way to attend to the minute materiality of cinema, while grasping and contesting the histories imbricated in every image and sound? In "A Philosophical Interpretation of Freud," Paul Ricoeur (drawing upon Hegel) remarks: "The appropriation of a meaning constituted prior to me presupposes the movement of a subject drawn ahead of itself by a succession of 'figures,' each of which finds its meaning in the ones which follow it." The notion of the figural has recently become popular in European film theory and analysis, especially due to the work of Nicole Brenez -- in which the figure stands for "the force . . . of everything that remains to be constituted" in a character, object, social relation or idea. Her use of the term refers back to magisterial work of German literary philologist Erich Auerbach (Mimesis), who decoded the religious interpretive system wherein all persons and events are grasped as significant only insofar as they prefigure their fulfilment on the 'last day' of divine judgment. Auerbach's 1920s work on figuration in Dante was an important influence on his friend Walter Benjamin; and it was this 'theological' aspect of Benjamin's thought that caught Kracauer's attention, leading to the problematic of the redemption of worldly things. Last Day Every Day traces the notion of figural thinking from Weimar then to Paris (and beyond) today, taking in contemporary writings by William Routt and Giorgio Agamben, as well as two filmmakers also touched by such thinking and its cultural ambience: Josef von Sternberg (The Blue Angel) and Douglas Sirk (The Tarnished Angels). Figural analysis has a resonance for its practitioners today that goes far beyond its theological roots and undertones. It has become a way to trace and write cultural history, sensitive to the smallest but most powerful vibrations, exchanges, and metamorphoses within texts, whether filmic, literary, pictorial, aural, or theatrical. Modern cinema, in particular, often reverberates with the apocalyptic thunder of the last day (think Lars von Trier's Melancholia or Abel Ferrara's 4:44 Last Day on Earth) -- while also opening us to the miracles and mysteries, the perplexities and potentialities, of every day.
Motion pictures --- Film criticism. --- Philosophy. --- film studies --- Eric Auerbach --- Siegfried Kracauer --- Nicole Brenez --- Douglas Sirk
Choose an application
Onde se encontra a análise fílmica hoje? O que e que a teoria de cinema anda a desenvolver na obscuridade? Este campo, tal como foi definido profissionalmente (pelo menos no mundo academico anglo-saxónico), encontra-se actualmente dividido entre historiadores interessados no contexto das grandes formações da modernidade e connoisseurs que reclamam o regresso estilístico de coisas antiquadas como a visão autoral, o tom ou a mise-en-scene. Mas há tambem outras correntes, vitais e inventivas -- na crítica, na internet, em pequenas revistas, em conferências renegadas um pouco por todo o lado --, que não estamos a conseguir escutar em nenhum dos canais oficiais. Último Dia Todos os Dias, de Adrian Martin -- nesta edição acompanhado do ensaio "Avatares do Encontro" --, lança uma luz sobre estas novas e excitantes avenidas.Publicado originalmente como Last Day Every Day: Figural Thinking from Auerbach and Kracauer to Agamben and Brenez, em 2012, por Dead Letter Office, uma serie da editora punctum books. Esta edição foi produzida conjuntamente por Centro de Estudos Comparatistas | Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa e punctum books, 2015.
Motion pictures --- Film criticism. --- Philosophy. --- film studies --- Eric Auerbach --- Siegfried Kracauer --- Nicole Brenez --- Douglas Sirk
Choose an application
Dónde se encuentra el análisis cinematográfico hoy? Que está haciendo, en la oscuridad, la teoría del cine? Este campo, tal y como ha sido definido profesionalmente (por lo menos en el mundo academico anglo-americano), está dividido actualmente entre los historiadores interesados en el contexto social que examinan las grandes formaciones de la modernidad, y los expertos en el estilo que reclaman la vuelta de cosas pasadas de moda como la visión autoral, el tono, y la puesta en escena. Pero hay tambien otras corrientes, vitales e inventivas, de las que apenas estamos oyendo nada en ninguno de los canales oficiales. Último día cada día, que para esta edición ha sido extendido con el ensayo "Avatares del encuentro", hace brillar una luz sobre una de estas nuevas y excitantes vías.
Motion pictures --- Film criticism. --- Philosophy. --- film studies --- Eric Auerbach --- Siegfried Kracauer --- Nicole Brenez --- Douglas Sirk
Choose an application
This book explores Walter Benjamin, Siegfried Kracauer and Alexander Kluge's analyses of the role that a rejuvenation in the capacity for imagination can play in encouraging us to reconceive the possibilities of the past, the present, and the future outside of the parameters of the status quo. The concept of imagination to which the title of the book refers is not a strictly defined, stable concept, but rather a term which is employed to refer to a capacity that facilitates both an active, creative relationship to one's environment, and a process of mediation between the outside world and one's own experiences and memories. Through a detailed analysis of their engagements with subjects that span a broad range of historical and thematic contexts (including topics as diverse as literature, children's play, film, photography, history, and television) the book charts the extent to which the concept of imagination plays a central role in Benjamin, Kracauer, and Kluge's explorations of a mode of perception and experience which could serve as a catalyst for the creation and sustenance of a desire for a different kind of future. Reviewed in: cultural studies review, 14/2, 9 (2008), Lisa McDonald fsk Hamburg, 09.08.2009, Olaf Berg
Media studies --- Aesthetics. --- Alexander Kluge. --- Cultural Theory. --- Culture. --- Film. --- Imagination. --- Literature. --- Media Philosophy. --- Media Studies. --- Media Theory. --- Media. --- Siegfried Kracauer. --- Walter Benjamin. --- Movie; Media; Culture; Literature; Imagination; Walter Benjamin; Siegfried Kracauer; Alexander Kluge; Aesthetics; Film; Media Theory; Media Philosophy; Cultural Theory; Media Studies --- Arts --- Perception (Philosophy) --- Political aspects. --- Philosophy --- Movie --- Media --- Culture --- Literature --- Imagination --- Walter Benjamin --- Siegfried Kracauer --- Alexander Kluge --- Aesthetics --- Film --- Media Theory --- Media Philosophy --- Cultural Theory --- Media Studies
Choose an application
In the Weimar Republic, popular culture was the scene of heated controversies that tested the limits of national cohesion. How could marginal figures like a stigmatized villager, a grub street writer, or an advocate for nudism become flashpoints of political conflict? Peter S. Fisher draws on Siegfried Kracauer's trenchant observations on Weimar's contradictions to knit these exemplary stories together. Following his methodology, society's underdogs take center stage, pushing the headline makers into the background.
German Studies; History; Popular Culture; Weimar Republic; Siegfried Kracauer; Cultural History; German History; Critical Theory; Cultural Studies --- Critical Theory. --- Cultural History. --- Cultural Studies. --- German History. --- History. --- Popular Culture. --- Siegfried Kracauer. --- Weimar Republic. --- Kracauer, Siegfried, --- 1800-1933 --- Germany --- Allemagne --- Germany. --- History --- Histoire
Choose an application
Siegfried Kracauer (1889-1966), friend and colleague of Walter Benjamin and Theodor Adorno, was one of the most influential film critics of the mid-twentieth century. In this book, Johannes von Moltke and Kristy Rawson have, for the first time assembled essays in cultural criticism, film, literature, and media theory that Kracauer wrote during the quarter century he spent in America after fleeing Nazi-occupied Europe. In the decades following his arrival in the United States, Kracauer commented on developments in American and European cinema, wrote on film noir and neorealism, examined unsettling political trends in mainstream cinema, and reviewed the contemporary experiments of avant-garde filmmakers. As a cultural critic, he also ranged far beyond cinema, intervening in debates regarding Jewish culture, unraveling national and racial stereotypes, and reflecting on the state of arts and humanities in the 1950's. These essays, together with the editors' introductions and an afterward by Martin Jay offer illuminating insights into the films and culture of the postwar years and provide a unique perspective on this eminent émigré intellectual.
Kracauer, Siegfried, 1889-1966 -- Criticism and interpretation. --- Kracauer, Siegfried, 1889-1966. Theorie des Films. --- Motion pictures. --- Motion pictures -- History. --- Motion pictures --- Music, Dance, Drama & Film --- Film --- Cinema --- Feature films --- Films --- Movies --- Moving-pictures --- Film reviews --- Motion picture plays --- Motion picture reviews --- Movie reviews --- Reviews of motion pictures --- History and criticism --- Audio-visual materials --- Mass media --- Performing arts --- 1950s america. --- 20th century. --- american and european cinema. --- biographical novels. --- book club reads. --- books for movie lovers. --- cinema trends. --- differences in american and european film. --- discussion books. --- easy to read. --- film and cinema. --- film critic books. --- film history. --- film theory. --- gifts for friends. --- history of cinema. --- history. --- how to be a movie critic. --- learning while reading. --- leisure reads. --- page turner. --- performing arts. --- political trends in film. --- postwar history. --- siegfried kracauer. --- speakeasy. --- vacation reads. --- walter benjamin.
Choose an application
Siegfried Kracauer is today considered one of the key thinkers of the twentieth century. During the Weimar Republic, he established himself as a trenchant theorist of film, culture, and modernity, now often ranked alongside his friends Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno. When he arrived in Manhattan aboard a crowded refugee ship in 1941, however, he was virtually unknown in the United States and had yet to write his best-known books, From Caligari to Hitler and Theory of Film. In this study, Johannes von Moltke details the intricate ways in which the American intellectual and political context shaped Kracauer's seminal contributions to film studies and shows how Kracauer's American writings helped shape the emergent discipline in turn. Through archival sources and detailed readings of Kracauer's work, von Moltke reconstructs what it means to consider Siegfried Kracauer as the New York Intellectual he became when he settled in Manhattan for the last quarter century of his life. Here, he found an institutional home at the MoMA film library, contributed to communications and propaganda research under the aegis of the Rockefeller Foundation, and published in the influential "little magazines" of the New York Intellectuals. Adopting a transatlantic perspective on Kracauer's work, von Moltke demonstrates how he pursued questions that animated contemporary critics from Adorno to Hannah Arendt, from Clement Greenberg to Robert Warshow: questions about the origins of totalitarianism and the authoritarian personality, about high and low culture, about liberalism, democracy, and what it means to be human. From these wide-flung conversations and debates, Kracauer's own voice emerges as that of an incisive cultural critic invested in a humanist understanding of the cinema.
Motion pictures --- Film critics --- Motion picture critics --- Moving-picture critics --- Critics --- Cinema --- Feature films --- Films --- Movies --- Moving-pictures --- Audio-visual materials --- Mass media --- Performing arts --- History. --- Political aspects. --- History and criticism --- Kracauer, Siegfried, --- Ginster, --- Kracauer, S. --- Krakauėr, Z. --- Krakauėr, Zigfrid --- Criticism and interpretation. --- Critiques de cinéma --- Cinéma et politique. --- Cinéma --- Histoire et critique. --- Political aspects --- History --- 1940s. --- 20th century. --- academic. --- american history. --- authoritarian. --- caligari. --- clement greenberg. --- contemporary philosopher. --- contemporary thinker. --- culture. --- film making. --- film studies. --- film theory. --- great thinkers. --- hannah arendt. --- hitler. --- immigrant. --- immigration. --- intellectual. --- manhattan. --- modern thinker. --- modern world. --- modernity. --- new york. --- philosopher. --- philosophy. --- refugee. --- research. --- robert warshow. --- siegfried kracauer. --- theodor adorno. --- theorist. --- theory of film. --- theory. --- totalitarianism. --- transatlantic. --- united states. --- weimar republic. --- world history.
Choose an application
In his doctoral dissertation, Christoph Seelinger provides an overview of strategies for legitimizing and functionalizing documentary death scenes in narrative cinema. Seelinger's chronological arc begins with the earliest animal deaths on camera, such as the filmed execution of the female elephant Topsy in »Electrocuting an Elephant – Thomas A. Edison« (1903), and it continues to the glossy snuff videos of the Islamic State's media department in the 2010s. Between these two poles, the author – with the same academic scrutiny – looks at established arthouse films, but all also at countless representations of station cinema that have been dismissed as trash and exploitation and have so far eluded academic research. The result is a foray through the more ostracized regions of cinema history and, in the process, nothing less than the first detailed history of the intrusion of real depictions of death into the fiction of the feature film. Christoph Seelinger liefert in seiner Promotionsschrift einen Überblick über Legitimations- und Funktionalisierungsstrategien dokumentarischer Toten- und Todesszenen im Erzählkino. Seelingers chronologischer Bogen beginnt bei den frühesten animalischen Toden vor laufender Kamera wie beispielsweise der filmisch festgehaltenen Hinrichtung des Elefantenweibchens Topsy in »Electrocuting an Elephant – Thomas A. Edison« (1903) und er führt bis zu den Hochglanz-Snuff-Videos der Medienabteilung des Islamischen Staates in den 2010er Jahren. Zwischen diesen beiden Polen betrachtet der Autor mit derselben medienwissenschaftlichen Hinwendung arrivierte Arthouse-Filme, vor allem aber auch zahllose als Trash und Exploitation abqualifizierte Vertreter des Bahnhofskinos, die einem akademischen Zugriff bislang entzogen waren. Das Ergebnis ist ein Streifzug durch die verfemteren Regionen der Kinogeschichte und dabei nichts weniger als die erste auführliche Geschichte des Einbruchs realer Todesdarstellungen in die Fiktion des Spielfilms.
Experimental films --- Humanities --- Benjamin, Walter, --- Kracauer, Siegfried, --- Germany --- death and cinema --- death and photography --- snuff films --- death in film --- Learning and scholarship --- Classical education --- Avant-garde films --- Experimental videos --- Personal films --- Underground films --- Motion pictures --- Video art --- Ginster, --- Kracauer, S. --- Krakauėr, Z. --- Krakauėr, Zigfrid --- Banyaming, --- Benjamin, W. --- Benʼyamin, Varutā, --- Binyamin, Ṿalṭer, --- Holz, Detlef, --- Peñcamin̲, Vālṭṭar, --- Penyamin, Palt'ŏ, --- Alemania --- Ashkenaz --- BRD --- Bu̇gd Naĭramdakh German Uls --- Bundesrepublik Deutschland --- Deguo --- Deutsches Reich --- Deutschland --- Doitsu --- Doitsu Renpō Kyōwakoku --- Federal Republic of Germany --- Federalʹna Respublika Nimechchyny --- FRN --- Gėrman --- German Uls --- Germania --- Germanii︠a︡ --- Germanyah --- Gjermani --- Grossdeutsches Reich --- Jirmānīya --- KhBNGU --- Kholboony Bu̇gd Naĭramdakh German Uls --- Nimechchyna --- Repoblika Federalin'i Alemana --- República de Alemania --- República Federal de Alemania --- Republika Federal Alemmana --- Vācijā --- Veĭmarskai︠a︡ Respublika --- Weimar Republic --- Weimarer Republik --- Germany (East) --- Germany (West) --- Europe --- Film theory & criticism --- Film: styles & genres --- Death and cinema; Mondo; experimental cinema; death and photography; grindhouse; Walter Benjamin; genre cinema; crossing borders; transgression; Siegfried Kracauer; Georges Bataille; dying in film; snuff; fairground cinema; exploitation cinema; staging death; film history; death scenes; death in film
Listing 1 - 8 of 8 |
Sort by
|