Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This work systematically compiles eleven outstanding research papers that were presented at the 3rd International Congress on Ethics in Cuenca, University City, Ecuador in November 2022. The Catholic University of Cuenca, beyond hosting the event, is committed to ethics in a holistic way. As such, to deliver this work for the benefit of the community is to expand the debate on it in areas of collective relevance such as face-to-face and online university education, pre-professional practices, professional qualifications, the equity of women workers, nature as a subject of rights, professional conduct, Ethics in Care Committees, the trend, style, and praxis of architectural design, and particularly the role of the university in the construction of an ethical culture from the perspective of students. Thus, this book invites those attending the event and readers to empower themselves with the work in order to strengthen ethics in all its dimensions and in everyday practice.

Ethical intuitionism.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Can moral disagreements be rationally resolved? Can universal human rights be defended in face of moral disagreements? The problem of moral disagreement is one of the central problems in moral thinking. It also provides a stimulating stepping-stone to some of the perennial problems of philosophy, such as relativism, scepticism, and objectivity. Moral Disagreements is the first anthology to bring together classic and contemporary readings on this key topic. Clearly divided into five parts; The Historical Debate; Voices from Anthropology; Challenges to Moral Objectivity; Defenses of Moral Obje

Ethical problems. --- Dilemmas, Ethical --- Dilemmas, Moral --- Ethical dilemmas --- Moral dilemmas --- Problems, Ethical --- Casuistry --- Ethics --- Applied ethics

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

What should happen when doctors and parents disagree about what would be best for a child? When should courts become involved? Should life support be stopped against parents' wishes? The case of Charlie Gard, reached global attention in 2017. It led to widespread debate about the ethics of disagreements between doctors and parents, about the place of the law in such disputes, and about the variation in approach between different parts of the world. In this book, medical ethicists Dominic Wilkinson and Julian Savulescu critically examine the ethical questions at the heart of disputes about medical treatment for children. They use the Gard case as a springboard to a wider discussion about the rights of parents, the harms of treatment, and the vital issue of limited resources. They discuss other prominent UK and international cases of disagreement and conflict. From opposite sides of the debate Wilkinson and Savulescu provocatively outline the strongest arguments in favour of and against treatment. They analyse some of the distinctive and challenging features of treatment disputes in the 21st century and argue that disagreement about controversial ethical questions is both inevitable and desirable. They outline a series of lessons from the Gard case and propose a radical new "dissensus" framework for future cases of disagreement.

Pediatrics --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Moral and ethical aspects

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

With contributions from authoritative authors from around the globe, and from both the academy and government, this eclectic book presents cutting-edge perspectives on the role of ethics in public sector management--what it is and where it is going.

Public administration --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Moral and ethical aspects

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Liberalism --- Moral and ethical aspects.