Listing 1 - 8 of 8 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Loyalty and betrayal are among key concepts of the ethic of nationalism. Marriage of state and culture, which seems the essence of the congruence between political power structure and collective identity, usually offers a simple explanation of loyalty and dissent. Loyalty is seen as once-and-for-all commitment of the individual to his or her nation, whereas betrayal is identified as a failure to commit him or herself to a common cause or as a diversion from the object of political loyalty and cultural/linguistic fidelity. For conservative or radical nationalists, even social and cultural critique of one's people and state can be regarded as treason, whereas for their liberal counterparts it is precisely what constitutes political awareness, civic virtue, and a conscious dedication to the people and culture. "This book is the first attempt to provide a discursive map of Lithuanian liberal and conservative nationalism. Analyzing the works and views of dissenters and critics of society and culture, we can reveal a mode of being of liberal nationalism as a social and cultural criticism. This volume is of interest for intellectual historians, social theorists, students of East-Central European thought, and anyone interested in Baltic studies and the new members of the EU. Dissent: act of betrayal, or loyalty? Leonidas Donskis' new remarkable study is one consistent, thorough and dedicated effort to provide an answer to that question." - Zygmunt Bauman (from the Preface).
Nationalism --- Lithuania --- Politics and government. --- Nationalism. --- Consciousness, National --- Identity, National --- National consciousness --- National identity --- International relations --- Patriotism --- Political science --- Autonomy and independence movements --- Internationalism --- Political messianism
Choose an application
Much of the debates in this book revolves around Milan Kundera and his 1984 essay “The Tragedy of Central Europe.” Kundera wrote his polemical text when the world was pregnant with imminent social and political change, yet that world was still far from realizing that we would enter the last decade of the twentieth century with the Soviet empire and its network of satellite states missing from the political mappages Kundera was challenged by Joseph Brodsky and György Konrád for allegedly excluding Russia from the symbolic space of Europe, something the great author deeply believes he never did. To what extent was Kundera right in assuming that, if to exist means to be present in the eyes of those we love, then Central Europe does not exist anymore, just as Western Europe as we knew it has stopped existing? What were the mental, cultural, and intellectual realities that lay beneath or behind his beautiful and graceful metaphors? Are we justified in rehabilitating political optimism at the beginning of the twenty-first century? Are we able to reconcile the divided memories of Eastern or Central Europe and Western Europe regarding what happened to the world in 1968? And where is Central Europe now?
Civilization. --- Politics and government. --- Barbarism --- Civilisation --- Auxiliary sciences of history --- Culture --- Kundera, Milan --- Kundera, Milan. --- Kountera, Milan --- Кундера, Милан --- קונדרה, מילן --- كوندرا، ميلان --- Criticism and interpretation. --- Since 1989 --- Heisei Period (Japan) --- Europe, Central --- Europe, Central. --- History. --- 쿤데라, 밀란 --- クンデラ, ミラン
Choose an application
Happy are those epochs that had clear dramas, dreams, and doers of good or evil. Today technology has surpassed politics, the latter having in part become a supplement to technology and threatening to bring the creation of a technological society to completion. This society with its determinist consciousness regards a refusal to participate in the technological innovations and social networks (so indispensable for the exercise of social and political control) as sufficient grounds to remove all those who lag behind in the globalization process (or have disavowed its sanctified idea) to the mar
Political science --- Administration --- Civil government --- Commonwealth, The --- Government --- Political theory --- Political thought --- Politics --- Science, Political --- Social sciences --- State, The --- Philosophy --- Donskis, Leonidas --- Donskis, L. --- Donskis, Leonidas, --- Europe, Eastern --- East Europe --- Eastern Europe --- Politics and government
Choose an application
Leonidas Donskis Essay ist eine Kritik von Ideologie und Utopie. Die grundlegende These lautet, dass beide immer schon notwendige Ergänzungen der historischen und kulturellen Einbildungskraft waren, so dass das Böse nicht der Ideologie oder Utopie per se entspringt, sondern dem Versuch, sie eins zu eins in die gesellschaftliche Realität zu übersetzen. Die Kritik des Ideologischen und Utopischen erarbeitet Donskis vor der Folie der im zwanzigsten Jahrhundert vorherrschenden Auffassungen von Moral und Kulturkritik - im Kontext von Zivilisationsanalyse und Bewusstseinsgeschichte und in einer erhe
Culture --- Moral conditions --- Morals --- Social history --- Social norms --- Philosophy.
Choose an application
Academia is standing at a junction in time. Behind lies the community of the curious, ahead the mass and the market. This book joins in a growing stream of works that explore the vicissitudes of present-day European universities in what Bauman coined as liquid times. Here, a number of concerned (engaged) European scholars attempt to defend and brush up academic core values and practices, starting from their own life worlds and positions in higher education. They share the view that there is no point in turning back, nor in mechanically marching straight on. Above all, they uphold that there is no alternative to treasuring academia as a space for thinking together. Hopefully the fruit of this sine qua non invites to think with, and envision academic activism. Contributors are Samuel Abraham, Stefano Bianchini, Simon Charlesworth, Leonidas Donskis, Frans Kamsteeg, Joost van Loon, Ida Sabelis, Tamara Shefer and Harry Wels.
Education, Higher --- Universities and colleges --- Aims and objectives --- Planning. --- Colleges --- Degree-granting institutions --- Higher education institutions --- Higher education providers --- Institutions of higher education --- Postsecondary institutions --- Public institutions --- Schools --- Social Science --- Sociology --- General --- Europe --- Intellectual life
Choose an application
The book is comprised of essays that utilize Shakespeare as a productive window into topics of contemporary social and political relevance. Its interdisciplinary qualities make the book relevant for students of political studies, literature, philosophy, cultural studies, and history.
Political and social views. --- Shakespeare, William, --- Hākipia, Wiremu, --- Saixpēr, Gouilliam, --- Śeksper, --- Şekspir, --- Şekspir, Velyam, --- Šekspir, Vilijam, --- Šekspir, Viljem, --- Šekʻspiri, Uiliam, --- Ṣēkspiyar, --- Ṣēkspiyar Mahākavi, --- Ṣēkspiyar Mahākaviya, --- Ṣēkspiyar, Viliyam, --- Ṣēkspiyar, Villiyam, --- Šekspyras, --- Sha-ō, --- Sha-shih-pi-ya, --- Shake-speare, William, --- Shakespear, William, --- Shakespeare, --- Shakespeare, Guglielmo, --- Shakspeare, William, --- Shakspere, William, --- Shakspir, --- Shaḳspir, Ṿilyam, --- Shashibiya, --- Shekspīʼar, Viliyam, --- Sheḳspier, Ṿilyam, --- Shēkʻspir, --- Shekspir, U. --- Shekspir, Uiliam, --- Shekspir, Uĭlii͡am, --- Shekspir, V. --- Shekspir, Vilʹi͡am, --- Sheḳspir, Ṿilyam, --- Shēkʻspʻiyr, Vlilliam, --- Shekspyr, Vyli͡em, --- Shikisbīr, Wilyam, --- Syeiksŭpʻio, --- Szekspir, Wiliam, --- Szekspir, William, --- Tsikinya-chaka, --- Shakespeare, William --- Shekspir, Vilʹi︠a︡m, --- Shekspyr, Vyli︠e︡m, --- Шекспир, Вильям, --- Шекспир, Уильям, --- שייקספיר, וויליאם, --- שייקספיר, וו., --- שיקספיר, וויליאם --- שיקספיר, ויליאם --- שיקספיר, ויליאם, --- שכספיר, ויליאם, --- שכספיר, וילים, --- שכספיר, ו׳ --- שעפקספיר, וויליאם, --- שעקספיער, וויליאם --- שעקספיער, וויליאם, --- שעקספיער, ווילליאם --- שעקספיער, וו., --- שעקספיר --- שעקספיר, וו --- שעקספיר, וויליאם, --- שעקספיר, וויליאמ --- שעקספיר, ווילליאם --- שעקספיר, ווילליאם, --- שעקספיר, וו., --- שעקספיר, װיליאם, --- שעקספיר, װילליאם, --- שעקספיר, װ., --- שעקספער --- שעקספער, וויליאמ --- שקספיר --- שקספיר, וו --- שקספיר, וויליאם --- שקספיר, וויליאם, --- שקספיר, ווילים, --- שקספיר, וילאם --- שקספיר, ויליאם --- שקספיר, ויליאם, --- שקספיר, ויליים, --- שקספיר, וילים --- שקספיר, וילים, --- شاكسبير، وليم --- شاكسپير، وليم --- شكسبير، وليام --- شكسبير، وليم --- شكسبير، وليم، --- شكسبير، و. --- شكسپير، وليم --- شكسپير، ويليام --- شيكسبير، وليام --- شيكسبير، وليام.، --- شيكسبير، وليم --- شکسبير، وليم --- وليم شکسبير --- 沙士北亞威廉姆, --- 沙士比亞威廉姆, --- 莎士比亞威廉姆, --- 莎士比亞威廉, --- 莎士比亞, --- Criticism and interpretation. --- Shekspir, Uĭlii︠a︡m, --- Shekʻspir, Uilyam, --- Political and social views of a person
Choose an application
The Baltic philosopher Vasily Sesemann (1884-1963), rooted in the Classics and influenced but not dominated by Kant, Herder, Bergson, Husserl, and Lossky, was a first-rate scholar in the fields of aesthetics, epistemology, logic, and history of philosophy. But he is still relatively unknown internationally because he wrote mostly in Lithuanian and some of his many works are only now being translated into English. This successor volume to his Aesthetics collects eight noteworthy essays, ranging from the scholarly to the popular, on aesthetics, aesthetic education, national culture, and theory of knowledge. They reveal a sympathetic and responsive mind equally at home in Ancient Greek and modern French, German, and Russian philosophy; and capable both of untendentiously expounding their dominant ideas and fruitfully anticipating newer developments even as the latter began to take shape in early-to-mid-20th-century Western European philosophy. Hallmarks of Sesemann’s thought are the Heraclitean preference for becoming (dynamism, change) over being (stasis, timelessness) and the idea that any culture, in order to survive and grow, must be intellectually deep and open to foreign influences. This insight has crucial relevance to the debates about multiculturalism today.
Philosophy --- Sezemanas, Vosylius, --- Russia.
Choose an application
This volume is an attempt to rethink Niccolò Machiavelli, one of the most challenging political thinkers in the history of European political thought. In 2013, we will mark 500 years since Machiavelli wrote his puzzling letter to Lorenzo de’ Medici, Il Principe . This book is an endeavor to cover some of the most complex aspects of Machiavelli’s life and work.
Political and social views. --- Machiavelli, Niccolò, --- Ma-chi-wei-li, --- Macchiavelli, Nicholo, --- Machiavel, --- Machiavel, Nicholas, --- Machiavel, Nicolas, --- Machiavelli, N. --- Machiavelli, Niccolò di Bernardo dei, --- Machiavelli, Nicolò, --- Majiyaweili, Nikeluo, --- Makiavelli, Nikkolo, --- Makiavelli, Nikolo, --- Mākiẏābhelli, Nikkolo, --- Makiyavel, --- Mākiyāvillī, --- Makkiyavelli, Nikkōlō, --- Maḳyaveli, Niḳolo, --- Makyaveri, --- Maquiavel, Nicolau, --- Maquiavelo, Nicolás, --- Niecollucci, Amadio, --- Nikhōlō Mākhiʻāwēnlī, --- Nikkōlō Makkiyavelli, --- Criticism and interpretation --- Political and social views --- Philosophy. --- Mental philosophy --- Humanities --- マキアヴェルリ
Listing 1 - 8 of 8 |
Sort by
|