Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Que vous soyez pour ou contre, de droite ou de gauche, vous croyez tout savoir sur le libéralisme, "sauvage" pour les uns, "salutaire" pour les autres. Mais pourquoi faut-il supprimer la législation sur la concurrence, instaurer la liberté d’immigration, supprimer le monopole de la Sécurité sociale ou encore recourir aux privatisations pour résoudre les problèmes écologiques ? Pourquoi l’euro n’est-il pas une invention libérale ? Pourquoi la mondialisation est-elle préférable à l’intégration régionale ? Pourquoi la politique de stabilisation est-elle une source d’instabilité économique ? Une réévaluation en profondeur de la pensée libérale ; une contribution iconoclaste aux débats sur les principes et la philosophie qui doivent nous guider. Et si le libéralisme, fort des trois principes que sont la liberté, la propriété, la responsabilité, était le véritable humanisme, la seule vraie utopie réaliste qui autorise la plus belle des espérances pour notre temps : la confiance optimiste dans l’individu ?

Liberalism --- Cooperation. --- Responsibility. --- 329.12 --- Cooperation --- Responsibility --- Accountability --- Moral responsibility --- Obligation --- Ethics --- Supererogation --- Liberal egalitarianism --- Liberty --- Political science --- Social sciences --- Collaborative economy --- Cooperative distribution --- Cooperative movement --- Distribution, Cooperative --- Peer-to-peer economy --- Sharing economy --- Economics --- Profit-sharing --- Liberalism. --- Liberalism - France.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Economic order --- Yugoslavia --- Economics --- Cooperation --- Resource Allocation --- Management --- Employee participation --- -Resource allocation --- Allocation of resources --- Resources allocation --- Operations research --- Organization --- Planning --- Feasibility studies --- Administration --- Industrial relations --- Economic theory --- Political economy --- Social sciences --- Economic man --- Cooperative distribution --- Cooperative movement --- Distribution, Cooperative --- Profit-sharing --- -Cooperation. --- Economics. --- Resource allocation. --- -Cooperation --- Cooperation. --- Collaborative economy --- Peer-to-peer economy --- Sharing economy --- Resource allocation --- Management - Employee participation - Yugoslavia

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Cooperation --- Trade blocs --- Coalition (Social sciences) --- Commerce --- 339.5 --- Trade --- Economics --- Business --- Transportation --- Social groups --- Regional economic blocs --- Regional trading blocs --- Trading blocs --- International trade --- Cooperative distribution --- Cooperative movement --- Distribution, Cooperative --- Profit-sharing --- Buitenlandse handel. Internationale handel. Ruilvoet --- 339.5 Buitenlandse handel. Internationale handel. Ruilvoet --- Collaborative economy --- Peer-to-peer economy --- Sharing economy --- Coalitions --- Cooperation. --- Traffic (Commerce) --- Merchants

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Why do humans, uniquely among animals, cooperate in large numbers to advance projects for the common good? Contrary to the conventional wisdom in biology and economics, this generous and civic-minded behavior is widespread and cannot be explained simply by far-sighted self-interest or a desire to help close genealogical kin. In A Cooperative Species, Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis--pioneers in the new experimental and evolutionary science of human behavior--show that the central issue is not why selfish people act generously, but instead how genetic and cultural evolution has produced a species in which substantial numbers make sacrifices to uphold ethical norms and to help even total strangers. The authors describe how, for thousands of generations, cooperation with fellow group members has been essential to survival. Groups that created institutions to protect the civic-minded from exploitation by the selfish flourished and prevailed in conflicts with less cooperative groups. Key to this process was the evolution of social emotions such as shame and guilt, and our capacity to internalize social norms so that acting ethically became a personal goal rather than simply a prudent way to avoid punishment. Using experimental, archaeological, genetic, and ethnographic data to calibrate models of the coevolution of genes and culture as well as prehistoric warfare and other forms of group competition, A Cooperative Species provides a compelling and novel account of how humans came to be moral and cooperative.

Cooperation --- Cooperativeness --- Behavior evolution --- Moraal en ethiek (algemeenheden). --- Behavior evolution. --- 170 --- 201 --- AA / International- internationaal --- 316 --- Cooperation (Psychology) --- Social psychology --- Collaborative economy --- Cooperative distribution --- Cooperative movement --- Distribution, Cooperative --- Peer-to-peer economy --- Sharing economy --- Economics --- Profit-sharing --- Behavioral evolution --- Evolutionary psychology --- 316 Sociologie --(algemeen) --- Sociologie --(algemeen) --- Moraal en ethiek (algemeenheden) --- Sociologie: algemeenheden --- Economic order --- Cooperation. --- Cooperativeness.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

One individual's contribution to a large collective project - such as voting in a national election or contributing to a public television fund-raising campaign - often seems negligible. A striking proposition of contemporary economics and political science is that it would be an exercise of reason, not a failure of it, not to contribute to a collective project if the contribution is negligible, but to benefit from it nonetheless.But Richard Tuck wonders whether this phenomenon of free riding is a timeless aspect of human nature or a recent, historically contingent one. He argues for the latter, showing that the notion would have seemed strange to people in the nineteenth century and earlier and that the concept only became accepted when the idea of perfect competition took hold in economics in the early twentieth century.Tuck makes careful distinctions between the prisoner's dilemma problem, threshold phenomena such as voting, and free riding. He analyzes the notion of negligibility, and shows some of the logical difficulties in the idea - and how the ancient paradox of the sorites illustrates the difficulties.Tuck presents a bold challenge to the skeptical account of social cooperation so widely held today. If accepted, his argument may over time encourage more public-spirited behavior.

Social choice. --- Social interaction. --- Cooperation. --- Self-interest. --- Conduct of life --- Self --- Economic man --- NIMBY syndrome --- Collaborative economy --- Cooperative distribution --- Cooperative movement --- Distribution, Cooperative --- Peer-to-peer economy --- Sharing economy --- Economics --- Profit-sharing --- Human interaction --- Interaction, Social --- Symbolic interaction --- Exchange theory (Sociology) --- Psychology --- Social psychology --- Choice, Social --- Collective choice --- Public choice --- Choice (Psychology) --- Welfare economics --- Social choice --- Social interaction --- Cooperation --- Self-interest --- E-books