Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Intellectuals --- Progressivism (United States politics) --- United States

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Tout au long du XXe siècle, la modernité et le progressisme ont été les deux pôles de la légitimité. Les écrivains qui ont voulu jouer sur les deux tableaux ont dû un jour ou l'autre faire un choix délicat. Modernistes et progressistes se sont décriés, combattus et au bout du compte mutuellement affaiblis. Il est question, dans ce livre, des surréalistes, de Malraux, des revues Eur ope et Esprit, de la Nouvelle Revue française, de Sartre et de Camus, des brechtiens, du Nouveau Roman et du Nouveau Théâtre, de Tel Quel mais aussi de la démocratie et du totalitarisme

Progressive movement in literature --- Progressivism in literature --- French literature --- Modernism (Literature) --- History and criticism --- France --- 20th century --- French literature - 20th century - History and criticism --- Modernism (Literature) - France

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

World politics --- Great powers --- Strategy --- Progressivism (United States politics) --- Cheney, Richard B. --- Bush, George Walker, --- Political and social views --- United States --- Foreign relations --- Military policy --- Philosophy --- Bush, George W. (George Walker), --- Great powers. --- Strategy. --- Political and social views. --- foreign relations --- Philosophy. --- military policy. --- Progressivism (United States politics). --- World politics - 1989 --- -Great powers --- Cheney, Richard B. - Political and social views --- Bush, George Walker, - 1946- - Political and social views --- United States - Foreign relations - 21st century --- United States - Foreign relations - 2001-2009 --- United States - Military policy --- United States - Foreign relations - Philosophy --- Bush, George Walker, - 1946 --- -United States

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Americans are increasingly ruled by an unwritten constitution consisting of executive orders, signing statements, and other forms of quasi-law that lack the predictability and consistency essential for the legal system to function properly. As a result, the U.S. Constitution no longer means what it says to the people it is supposed to govern, and the government no longer acts according to the rule of law. These developments can be traced back to a change in “constitutional morality,” Bruce Frohnen and George Carey argue in this challenging book. The principle of separation of powers among co-equal branches of government formed the cornerstone of America’s original constitutional morality. But toward the end of the nineteenth century, Progressives began to attack this bedrock principle, believing that it impeded government from “doing the people’s business.” The regime of mixed powers, delegation, and expansive legal interpretation they instituted rejected the ideals of limited government that had given birth to the Constitution. Instead, Progressives promoted a governmental model rooted in French revolutionary claims. They replaced a Constitution designed to mediate among society’s different geographic and socioeconomic groups with a body of quasi-laws commanding the democratic reformation of society. Pursuit of this Progressive vision has become ingrained in American legal and political culture—at the cost, according to Frohnen and Carey, of the constitutional safeguards that preserve the rule of law.

Constitutional law --- Constitutional history --- Rule of law --- Executive power --- Delegated legislation --- Progressivism (United States politics) --- Political ethics --- Presidents --- Powers --- Constitutional law - United States. --- Constitutional history - United States. --- Rule of law - United States. --- Executive power - United States. --- Delegated legislation - United States. --- Political ethics - United States.