Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
"The editors' earlier book Delivering Family Justice in the 21st Century (2016) described a period of turbulence in family justice arising from financial austerity. Governments across the world have sought to reduce public spending on private quarrels by promoting mediation (ADR) and by beginning to look at digital justice (ODR) as alternatives to courts and lawyers. But this book describes how mediation has failed to take the place of courts and lawyers, even where public funding for legal help has been removed. Instead ODR has developed rapidly, led by the Dutch Rechtwijzer. The authors question the speed of this development, and stress the need for careful evaluation of how far these services can meet the needs of divorcing families. In this book experts from Canada, Australia, Turkey, Spain, Germany, France, Poland, Scotland and England and Wales explore how ADR has fallen behind. But also how we have learned from the rise and fall of ODR in the Rechtwijzer about what digital justice can and cannot achieve. Managing procedure and process? Yes. Dispute resolution? Not yet. The authors end by raising broader questions about the role of a family justice system: is it dispute resolution? or dispute prevention, management, and above all legal protection of the vulnerable?"--
Domestic relations courts. --- Family courts --- Courts of special jurisdiction --- Juvenile courts --- Matrimonial actions. --- Online dispute resolution. --- ODR (Online dispute resolution) --- Online dispute resolution --- Dispute resolution (Law) --- Matrimonial causes --- Matrimonial suits --- Actions and defenses --- Civil procedure --- Marriage law --- Law and legislation --- Domestic relations courts --- Matrimonial actions
Choose an application
The adoption of electronic commercial transactions has facilitated cross-border trade and business, but the complexity of determining the place of business and other connecting factors in cyberspace has challenged existing private international law. This comparison of the rules of internet jurisdiction and choice of law as well as online dispute resolution (ODR) covers both B2B and B2C contracts in the EU, USA and China. It highlights the achievement of the Rome I Regulation in the EU, evaluates the merits of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreement at the international level and gives an insight into the current developments in CIDIP. The in-depth research allows for solutions to be proposed relating to the problems of the legal uncertainty of internet conflict of law and the validity and enforceability of ODR agreements and decisions.
Conflict of laws --- Online dispute resolution --- Electronic commerce --- ODR (Online dispute resolution) --- Dispute resolution (Law) --- Choice of law --- Intermunicipal law --- International law, Private --- International private law --- Private international law --- Law --- Legal polycentricity --- Law and legislation --- Civil law --- Conflict of laws - Electronic commerce - China --- Conflict of laws - Electronic commerce - European Union countries --- Conflict of laws - Electronic commerce - United States --- Online dispute resolution - China --- Online dispute resolution - United States --- Online dispute resolution - European Union countries --- Etats-Unis --- Chine --- General and Others --- Commerce électronique (Droit international privé) --- Règlement de conflits en ligne --- Comparative law --- Droit comparé
Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|