Listing 1 - 10 of 45 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
D document (Biblical criticism) --- Jews --- History --- Bible. --- History of Biblical events.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
D document (Biblical criticism) --- Jews --- History --- -Hebrews --- Israelites --- Jewish people --- Jewry --- Judaic people --- Judaists --- Ethnology --- Religious adherents --- Semites --- Judaism --- Deuteronomist document --- Deuteronomistic history (Biblical criticism) --- -D document (Biblical criticism) --- -History --- Bible. --- Historical Books (Books of the Old Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Jews - History - To 586 B.C.
Choose an application
This volume deals with the question of the 'deuteronomistic history' in the Old Testament and attempts to demonstrate that such a uniform history never existed; the books of Deuteronomy - 2 Kings do not contain such a history. The first part of the book shows that there is no homogenous conceptual framework in the deuteronomistic historical books. For example, different concepts of sin and punishment are found. Even the destruction of Judah and Jerusalem does not represent a 'Leitmotiv' of divine punishment. The second part of the book deals with problems relating to the various deuteronomistic redactions in the historical books of the Old Testament. In this book the author introduces new perspectives in the discussion of a central problem of Old Testament scholarship.
Deuteronomistic history (Biblical criticism) --- 222.4 --- Deuteronomic history (Biblical criticism) --- Deuteronomists (Biblical criticism) --- DH (Biblical criticism) --- D document (Biblical criticism) --- Deuteronomium --- Bible. --- Former Prophets --- Neviʼim rishonim --- Profetas primeros --- Prophetae Priores --- Criticism, Redaction.
Choose an application
The Reform of King Josiah and the Composition of the Deuteronomistic History defends the thesis that 1 and 2 Kings arose in three redactional phases. The first author described the history of Judah and Israel from Solomon to Hezekiah (1 Kgs 3-2 Kgs 20). A second redactor, inspired by Deuteronomy, completed the history up to King Josiah and altered the work of his predecessor. The work of these two redactors was limited to Kings. A third redactor, also inspired by Deuteronomy, completed the history up to the exile. Unlike the preceding authors he reworked the whole of the deuteronomistic history. The first part of this study subjects the regnal formulae to a critical analysis. The second part studies 2 Kgs 23:1-30 as a text case in detecting the redactional structure of Kings.
D [Document ] (Exégèse biblique) --- D document (Biblical criticism) --- D traditie (Bijbelexegese) --- Document D (Exégèse biblique) --- D document (Biblical criticism). --- Josiah, --- Bible. --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- 222.4 --- Deuteronomist document --- Deuteronomistic history (Biblical criticism) --- Deuteronomium --- Josiah King of Judah --- Theses --- Josia, --- Josias, --- Yoshiyahu, --- Gioas, --- יאשיהו, --- Bible. O.T. Kings, 2nd, XXII-XXIII --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- Deuteronomist history (Biblical criticism) --- Bible. A.T.. Rois --- Bible. A.T.. Rois. II --- Josias (06..-0609 av. J.-C. ; roi de Juda) --- Bible. A.T. Deutéronome --- Document (Critique biblique) --- Critique rédactionnelle --- 23, 1-30 --- Critique, interprétation, etc.
Choose an application
In the politico-religious history of the Deuteronomists, past, present and future mingle in an often inextricable way. Long obsolete traditions, which had been unacceptable to the Davidic dynasty, were rediscovered and adapted to the aims of the Deuteronomists. Personages of the past were condemned and blackened in the light of the new ideology, whereas others were glorified and embellished as heroes of faith because their ideas suited the historians. This inevitably raises the question whether the Bible can be trusted as a source book for writing a history of Israel. Apparently not, say scholars like T.L. Thompson, P.R. Davies and N.P. Lemche. In this volume a number of authors take up this challenge, stating that the radical rejection of the biblical testimony in favour of a history based mainly on archaeology is ill-advised. Several contributions to this volume draw instructive parallels between the process of re-writing the history of South Africa and the work of the Deuteronomists.
Deuteronomistic history (Biblical criticism) --- 222.4 --- 224 --- Deuteronomic history (Biblical criticism) --- Deuteronomists (Biblical criticism) --- DH (Biblical criticism) --- D document (Biblical criticism) --- Deuteronomium --- Profetische boeken van het Oude Testament --- Congresses --- Deuteronomistic history (Biblical criticism) - Congresses. --- Deuteronomist history (Biblical criticism) --- Prophet --- Prophets --- Biblical teaching --- Bible AT Deutéronome --- Prophètes --- Document D (critique biblique) --- Critique, interprétation, etc --- Enseignement biblique --- Prophet.
Choose an application
D document (Biblical criticism) --- Bible --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- 222.4 --- Deuteronomist document --- Deuteronomistic history (Biblical criticism) --- Deuteronomium --- Bible. --- Chronicles (Book of the Old Testament) --- Divre ha-yamim (Book of the Old Testament) --- Paralipomenon (Book of the Old Testament) --- Yŏktae kisŏ (Book of the Old Testament) --- Yŏktaegi (Book of the Old Testament) --- Chronikbuch (Book of the Old Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Listing 1 - 10 of 45 | << page >> |
Sort by
|