Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A supposer que nous disposions, dans notre tradition dite occidentale (juive, grecque, romaine, chrétienne, islamique), d'un concept unifié, stabilisé, donc fiable du mensonge, il ne suffirait pas de lui reconnaître une historicité intrinsèquement théorique, à savoir ce qui le distinguerait d'autres concepts dans d'autres histoires et d'autres cultures. Il faudrait aussi examiner l'hypothèse d'une historicité pratique, sociale, politique, juridique, technique qui l'aurait transformé, voire marqué de ruptures à l'intérieur de notre tradition. C'est à cette dernière hypothèse que je voudrais accorder ici, provisoirement, quelque privilège. Mais pourra-t-on jamais distinguer entre ces trois choses, à savoir 1) une histoire (Historie) du concept de mensonge, 2) une histoire (Geschichte) du mensonge, faite de tous les événements qui sont arrivés au mensonge ou par le mensonge, et, d'autre part, enfin, 3) une histoire vraie qui ordonne le récit (Historie, historia rerum gestarum) de ces mensonges ou du mensonge en général ? Comment dissocier ou alterner ces trois tâches ?".

Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Philosophy and psychology of culture --- Truthfulness and falsehood --- Deconstruction --- Believability --- Credibility --- Falsehood --- Lying --- Untruthfulness --- Reliability --- Truth --- Honesty --- Criticism --- Semiotics and literature --- Post-truth

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

General ethics --- 82:17 --- Literatuur en ethiek --- Truthfulness and falsehood. --- Psychoanalyse --- klinische beschouwingen --- klinische beschouwingen. --- 82:17 Literatuur en ethiek --- Truthfulness and falsehood --- Believability --- Credibility --- Falsehood --- Lying --- Untruthfulness --- Reliability --- Truth --- Honesty --- Post-truth

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

General ethics --- Truthfulness and falsehood --- #gsdb5 --- #GROL:SEMI-241.66 --- #GGSB: Sociaal-economische ethiek --- Believability --- Credibility --- Falsehood --- Lying --- Untruthfulness --- Reliability --- Truth --- Honesty --- Social aspects --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Post-truth --- Sociaal-economische ethiek

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Jennifer Saul presents a close analysis of the distinction between lying to others and misleading them. Shedding light on key debates in philosophy of language and tackling the widespread moral preference for misleading over lying, she establishes a new view on the moral significance of the distinction.

Philosophy of language --- General ethics --- Truthfulness and falsehood. --- Language and languages --- Philosophy. --- Truthfulness and falsehood --- Deception --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Chicanery --- Deceit --- Subterfuge --- Intrigue --- Believability --- Credibility --- Falsehood --- Lying --- Post-truth --- Untruthfulness --- Reliability --- Truth --- Honesty

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Social problems --- Psychology and law --- liegen --- sociaal gedrag --- Deception --- -Truthfulness and falsehood --- -#PBIB:gift 2003 --- #PBIB:2003.2 --- #KVHB:Liegen --- #KVHB:Sociale psychologie --- Believability --- Credibility --- Falsehood --- Lying --- Untruthfulness --- Reliability --- Truth --- Honesty --- Chicanery --- Deceit --- Subterfuge --- Truthfulness and falsehood --- Intrigue --- 007 --- 301.15 --- Psychological aspects --- Psychological aspects. --- #PBIB:gift 2003 --- Post-truth