Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Die narrative Dimension ist in der theaterwissenschaftlich orientierten Aufführungsanalyse bislang unterrepräsentiert.Um dieses Desiderat zu beheben, untersucht die Arbeit nicht etwa von Figuren erzählte Passagen in einzelnen Aufführungen, sondern stellt generell die Frage: Wie erzählt das Theater? Die Theaternarratologie entwickelt somit erstmals auf Grundlage eines umfassenden theoretischen Fundaments in Bezug auf die Forschungsfelder der klassischen und postklassischen Narratologie und der Theaterwissenschaft ein heuristisches Analysemodell performativen Erzählens, das sich zur praktischen Anwendung in der erzähltheoretischen Aufführungsanalyse eignet. Die entwickelten Analysekategorien machen es möglich, das theatrale Erzählen intersubjektiv nachvollziehbar zu beschreiben und in narratologischer Hinsicht nicht nur in intertheatrale, sondern auch in intermediale Kontexte zu stellen. Performativität und Narrativität werden zusammen und nicht als Gegensätze gedacht, wodurch die Möglichkeit einer Annäherung theaterwissenschaftlicher und narratologischer Forschung gegeben wird.

Literary rhetorics --- Theatrical science --- Drama --- Discourse analysis, Narrative --- Narration (Rhetoric) --- Narrative (Rhetoric) --- Narrative writing --- Rhetoric --- Narratees (Rhetoric) --- Narrative discourse analysis --- Discourse analysis, Narrative. --- Performativity. --- analysis. --- multimodality. --- narrativity.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Do our writings and our utterances reflect or describe our world, or do they intervene in it? Do they, perhaps, help to make it? If so, how? Within what limits, and with what implications? Contemporary theorists have considered the ways in which the languages we speak might be 'performative' in just this way, and their thinking on the topic has had an important impact on a broad range of academic disciplines.In this accessible introduction to a sometimes complex field, James Loxley:offers a concise and original account of critical debates around the idea of perform

Philosophical anthropology --- Literary semiotics --- Performative (Philosophy) --- Speech acts (Linguistics) --- 82.085 --- 82:1 --- 82:1 Literatuur en filosofie --- Literatuur en filosofie --- 82.085 Retorica. Argumentatieleer. Voordrachtkunst --- Retorica. Argumentatieleer. Voordrachtkunst --- Performative (Philosophy). --- Speech acts (Linguistics). --- Illocutionary acts (Linguistics) --- Speech act theory (Linguistics) --- Speech events (Linguistics) --- Language and languages --- Linguistics --- Speech --- Performativity (Philosophy) --- Methodology --- Philosophy --- Semantics (Philosophy) --- Philosophy. --- Mental philosophy --- Humanities

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This user-friendly introduction to a new 'performative' methodology in linguistic pragmatics breaks away from the traditional approach which understands language as a machine. Drawing on a wide spectrum of research and theory from the past thirty years in particular, Douglas Robinson presents a combination of 'action-oriented approaches' from sources such as J.L. Austin, H. Paul Grice, Harold Garfinkel and Erving Goffman.

Paying particular attention to language as drama, the group regulation of language use, individual resistance to these regulatory pressures and nonverbal comm

Conversation analysis. --- Performative (Philosophy). --- Pragmatics. --- Speech acts (Linguistics). --- Performative (Philosophy) --- Performativity (Philosophy) --- Speech acts (Linguistics) --- Analysis of conversation --- CA (Interpersonal communication) --- Conversational analysis --- Illocutionary acts (Linguistics) --- Speech act theory (Linguistics) --- Speech events (Linguistics) --- Pragmalinguistics --- Oral communication --- Language and languages --- Linguistics --- Speech --- Methodology --- Philosophy --- Semantics (Philosophy) --- General semantics --- Logic, Symbolic and mathematical --- Conversation analysis --- Pragmatics

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Translating and interpreting are unpredictable social practices framed by historical, ethical, and political constraints. Using the concepts of situatedness and performativity as anchors, the authors examine translation practices from the perspectives of identity performance, cultural mediation, historical reframing, and professional training. As such, the chapters focus on enacted events and conditioned practices by exploring production processes and the social, historical, and cultural conditions of the field. These outlooks shift our attention to social and institutionalized acts of translating and interpreting, considering also the materiality of bodies, artefacts, and technologies involved in these scenes.

Translating and interpreting --- Context (Linguistics) --- Performative (Philosophy) --- Performativity (Philosophy) --- Language and languages --- Methodology --- Philosophy --- Semantics (Philosophy) --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Situation (Linguistics) --- Linguistics --- Interpretation and translation --- Interpreting and translating --- Literature --- Translation and interpretation --- Translators --- Context --- Translating --- Translation science --- Context (Linguistics). --- Performative (Philosophy). --- Translating and interpreting. --- Contexte. --- Performatif (Philosophie) --- Traduction. --- Contexte (linguistique) --- Compétence et performance (linguistique) --- linguistique.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Raoul Moati intervenes in the critical debate that divided two prominent philosophers in the mid-twentieth century. In the 1950's, the British philosopher J. L. Austin advanced a theory of speech acts, or the "performative," that Jacques Derrida and John R. Searle interpreted in fundamentally different ways. Their disagreement centered on the issue of intentionality, which Derrida understood phenomenologically and Searle read pragmatically. The controversy had profound implications for the development of contemporary philosophy, which, Moati argues, can profit greatly by returning to this classic debate. In this book, Moati systematically replays the historical encounter between Austin, Derrida, and Searle and the disruption that caused the lasting break between Anglo-American language philosophy and continental traditions of phenomenology and its deconstruction. The key issue, Moati argues, is not whether "intentionality," a concept derived from Husserl's phenomenology, can or cannot be linked to Austin's speech-acts as defined in his groundbreaking How to Do Things with Words, but rather the emphasis Searle placed on the performativity and determined pragmatic values of Austin's speech-acts, whereas Derrida insisted on the trace of writing behind every act of speech and the iterability of signs in different contexts.

Derrida, Jacques --- Searle, John R. --- Language and languages --- Performative (Philosophy) --- Speech acts (Linguistics) --- Ordinary-language philosophy. --- Deconstruction. --- Intentionality (Philosophy) --- Act (Philosophy) --- Mind and body --- Philosophy --- Criticism --- Semiotics and literature --- Ordinary-language analysis --- Ordinary-language method --- Philosophy, Ordinary-language --- Analysis (Philosophy) --- Illocutionary acts (Linguistics) --- Speech act theory (Linguistics) --- Speech events (Linguistics) --- Linguistics --- Speech --- Performativity (Philosophy) --- Methodology --- Semantics (Philosophy) --- Foreign languages --- Languages --- Anthropology --- Communication --- Ethnology --- Information theory --- Meaning (Psychology) --- Philology --- Derrida, Jacques. --- Searle, J. R. --- Searle, John Rogers --- 존 설 --- Derrida, J. --- Derida, Žak --- Derrida, Jackes --- Derrida, Zhak --- Deridah, Z'aḳ --- Deridā, Jāka --- Dirīdā, Jāk --- Деррида, Жак --- דרידה, ז'אק