Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A sociological analysis of how immigration transforms Mexican immigrants' understandings of race in home and host countries.

Immigrants --- Mexicans --- Racism --- Social conditions. --- Race identity --- United States --- Mexico --- Race relations. --- Emigration and immigration --- Social aspects. --- Latino. --- Mexican migration. --- Mexico. --- immigration. --- mestizaje. --- race and ethnicity. --- race relations. --- racial hierarchy. --- racialization. --- transnationalism.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The story of racial hierarchy in the American film industry The #OscarsSoWhite campaign, and the content of the leaked Sony emails which revealed, among many other things, that a powerful Hollywood insider didn’t believe that Denzel Washington could “open” a western genre film, provide glaring evidence that the opportunities for people of color in Hollywood are limited. In The Hollywood Jim Crow, Maryann Erigha tells the story of inequality, looking at the practices and biases that limit the production and circulation of movies directed by racial minorities. She examines over 1,300 contemporary films, specifically focusing on directors, to show the key elements at work in maintaining “the Hollywood Jim Crow.” Unlike the Jim Crow era where ideas about innate racial inferiority and superiority were the grounds for segregation, Hollywood’s version tries to use economic and cultural explanations to justify the underrepresentation and stigmatization of Black filmmakers. Erigha exposes the key elements at work in maintaining Hollywood’s racial hierarchy, namely the relationship between genre and race, the ghettoization of Black directors to black films, and how Blackness is perceived by the Hollywood producers and studios who decide what gets made and who gets to make it. Erigha questions the notion that increased representation of African Americans behind the camera is the sole answer to the racial inequality gap. Instead, she suggests focusing on the obstacles to integration for African American film directors. Hollywood movies have an expansive reach and exert tremendous power in the national and global production, distribution, and exhibition of popular culture. The Hollywood Jim Crow fully dissects the racial inequality embedded in this industry, looking at alternative ways for African Americans to find success in Hollywood and suggesting how they can band together to forge their own career paths.

Motion pictures --- African American motion picture producers and directors. --- African Americans in the motion picture industry. --- Social aspects --- History. --- African Americans. --- Black. --- Hollywood. --- Oscars. --- W. E. B. Du Bois. --- audience. --- cinema. --- collective. --- culture. --- directors. --- distribution. --- economic. --- film. --- foreign market. --- franchise. --- genre. --- ghetto. --- inequality. --- liberal. --- media. --- production budgets. --- race. --- racial bias. --- racial hierarchy. --- racial minorities. --- racialization. --- representation. --- science fiction. --- stigma. --- studios. --- unbankable. --- underrepresented. --- universal.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Every academic discipline has an origin story complicit with white supremacy. Racial hierarchy and colonialism structured the very foundations of most disciplines' research and teaching paradigms. In the early twentieth century, the academy faced rising opposition and correction, evident in the intervention of scholars including W. E. B. Du Bois, Zora Neale Hurston, Carter G. Woodson, and others. By the mid-twentieth century, education itself became a center in the struggle for social justice. Scholars mounted insurgent efforts to discredit some of the most odious intellectual defenses of white supremacy in academia, but the disciplines and their keepers remained unwilling to interrogate many of the racist foundations of their fields, instead embracing a framework of racial colorblindness as their default position. This book challenges scholars and students to see race again. Examining the racial histories and colorblindness in fields as diverse as social psychology, the law, musicology, literary studies, sociology, and gender studies, Seeing Race Again documents the profoundly contradictory role of the academy in constructing, naturalizing, and reproducing racial hierarchy. It shows how colorblindness compromises the capacity of disciplines to effectively respond to the wide set of contemporary political, economic, and social crises marking public life today.

Racism in higher education --- Multicultural education --- Post-racialism --- Race discrimination --- United States --- Race relations. --- Race question --- Color blindness (Race relations) --- Colorblindness (Race relations) --- Post-racial society --- Postracialism --- Race blindness --- Race relations --- Education, Higher --- Sociology of minorities --- Sociology of the family. Sociology of sexuality --- 20th century. --- academic discipline. --- academy. --- carter g woodson. --- colonialism. --- education. --- gender studies. --- insurgent efforts. --- law. --- literary studies. --- musicology. --- origin story. --- racial colorblindness. --- racial hierarchy. --- racial histories. --- racist foundations. --- rising opposition. --- scholars. --- social justice. --- social psychology. --- sociology. --- teaching paradigms. --- w e b du bois. --- white supremacy. --- zora meale hurston. --- United States of America --- Race --- History --- Racism --- Legal theory --- Sociology --- Theory --- Academic sector --- Book --- Intersectionality