Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Christianity --- Kingdom of God. --- Devil. --- Kingdom of God --- Devil --- Religion --- Philosophy & Religion --- Beelzebub --- Beelzebul --- Lucifer --- Satan --- Satanael --- Satanail --- Demonology --- God, Kingdom of --- Eschatology --- God (Christianity) --- Religions --- Church history --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Church --- Origin. --- Origin --- Foundation --- Bible. --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Christianity.
Choose an application
The American and European public has a voracious appetite for more information about Jesus and the formation of early Christianity. The best-selling books on the subject by Marcus Borg, John Dominic Crossan, John Meyer, and Luke Timothy Johnson, among many others, attest to this hunger. But each of these scholars presents his own reading of the historical information, usually beginning with the earliest known Jesus-related material, Jesus'' sayings, and leads the public into a particular understanding of Jesus and the early Jesus movements. The New Q will provide the general public with the or
Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible. --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Choose an application
This is the first book to examine the Aramaic dimension of Q since the Aramaic Dead Sea scrolls made such work more feasible. Maurice Casey gives a detailed examination of key passages in Matthew and Luke's gospels, demonstrating that they used two different Greek translations of an Aramaic source, which can be reconstructed. He overturns the conventional model of Q as a single Greek document, and shows that Jesus said everything in the original Aramaic source. Further analysis of other gospel passages shows the evangelists editing a Greek translation of an Aramaic source. On one, it can be shown that Mark utilises a different Aramaic source. A complex model of Q is thus proposed. Casey argues that Aramaic sources behind part of Q are of extremely early date, and should contribute significantly to the quest for the historical Jesus.
Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Aramaic literature --- Relation to the New Testament. --- Document Q (Critique biblique) --- Hypothèse Q (Exégèse des synoptiques) --- Jésus-Christ--Logia --- Logia (Critique biblique) --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q [Tradition ] --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Quelle-hypothese (Exegese van de synoptici) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Source Q (Critique biblique) --- Tradition Q --- 226.1 --- -Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Middle Eastern literature --- Relation to the New Testament --- Arts and Humanities --- Religion --- Aramaic literature - Relation to the New Testament.
Choose an application
"This book discusses the composition of the synoptic gospels from the perspective of the Farrer hypothesis, a view that posits that Mark was written first, that Matthew used Mark as a source, and that Luke used both Mark and Matthew. All of the articles in the volume are written in support of the Farrer hypothesis, with the exception of the final chapter, which criticizes these articles from the perspective of the reigning Two-Source theory. The contributors engage the synoptic problem with a more refined understanding of the options set before each of the evangelists pointing towards a deepened understanding of how works were compiled in the first and early second centuries CE. The contributors include Andris Abakuks, Stephen Carlson, Eric Eve, Mark Goodacre, Heather Gorman, John S. Kloppenborg, David Landry, Mark Matson, Ken Olson, Michael Pahl, Jeffrey Peterson, and John C. Poirier."-- This book discusses the composition of the synoptic gospels from the perspective of the Farrer hypothesis, a view that posits that Mark was written first, that Matthew used Mark as a source, and that Luke used both Mark and Matthew. All of the articles in the volume are written in support of the Farrer hypothesis, with the exception of the final chapter, which criticizes these articles from the perspective of the reigning Two-Source theory. The contributors engage the synoptic problem with a more refined understanding of the options set before each of the evangelists pointing towards a deepened understanding of how works were compiled in the first and early second centuries CE. The contributors include Andris Abakuks, Stephen Carlson, Eric Eve, Mark Goodacre, Heather Gorman, John S. Kloppenborg, David Landry, Mark Matson, Ken Olson, Michael Pahl, Jeffrey Peterson, and John C. Poirier
Synoptic problem. --- Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- 226.1 --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Bible. --- Evangelie (Book of the New Testament) --- Fukuinsho (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Gospels, Synoptic (Books of the New Testament) --- Synoptic Gospels (Books of the New Testament) --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Marco (Book of the New Testament) --- Mark (Book of the New Testament) --- Markus (Book of the New Testament) --- Markusevangelium --- Vangelo di Marco --- Book of Mark
Choose an application
The monograph Judging Q and Saving Jesus is characterised by careful textual analysis, showing a piercing critical eye in its impressive engagement with the secondary literature, and sharp and insightful critique. The target audience are specialists in the field of research on the Sayings Source Q (the hypothetical source of certain sayings of Jesus common to Matthew and Luke), historical Jesus, and early Christian theology. The book takes the stance that the hypothetical document Q can be reconstructed with sufficient precision and that this enables biblical scholars to study with confidence its genre and its thematic and ideological profile. The genre issue is central to the book overall structure and the alternative proposals are discussed at length and with sophistication. The author’s inference is that Q’s macrogenre is sapiential with occasional insertions of apocalyptic microstructures and motifs. This finding embodies progress in Historical Jesus studies.
Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Theology --- apocalyptic --- do not judge --- documentary status --- eschatological --- historical jesus --- judgment --- judgement --- new testament --- apokaliptiese --- moenie oordeel --- eskatologiese --- historiese jesus --- oordeel --- new quest --- old quest --- psychostasia --- Logia --- Son of man --- Wisdom literature --- Jesus Christ --- Words. --- Christ --- Cristo --- Jezus Chrystus --- Jesus Cristo --- Jesus, --- Christ, Jesus --- Yeh-su --- Masīḥ --- Khristos --- Gesù --- Christo --- Yeshua --- Chrystus --- Gesú Cristo --- Ježíš --- Isa, --- Nabi Isa --- Isa Al-Masih --- Al-Masih, Isa --- Masih, Isa Al --- -Jesus, --- Jesucristo --- Yesu --- Yeh-su Chi-tu --- Iēsous --- Iēsous Christos --- Iēsous, --- Kʻristos --- Hisus Kʻristos --- Christos --- Jesuo --- Yeshuʻa ben Yosef --- Yeshua ben Yoseph --- Iisus --- Iisus Khristos --- Jeschua ben Joseph --- Ieso Kriʻste --- Yesus --- Kristus --- ישו --- ישו הנוצרי --- ישו הנצרי --- ישוע --- ישוע בן יוסף --- المسيح --- مسيح --- يسوع المسيح --- 耶稣 --- 耶稣基督 --- 예수그리스도 --- Jíizis --- Yéshoua --- Iėsu̇s --- Khrist Iėsu̇s --- عيسىٰ
Choose an application
A combination of two classic discussions in New Testament scholarship, the contributions in this volume shed light on the still unsolved synoptic problem by using the well-coined concept of rewriting to describe the relationship between the synoptic gospels. The contributions work with the hypothesis that the synoptic tradition can be conceived of as a process of rewriting: Matthew rewrote Mark and Luke rewrote Mark and Matthew. This approach to the synoptic problem dismantles the grounds for the otherwise widely accepted two-source theory. If it can be shown that Luke knew Matthew's Gospel the Q-hypothesis is superfluous. One group of articles focuses on the general question of Luke's literary relation to the other gospels. In these essays, the concept of rewriting describes Luke's use of his sources. The second part of the collection examines a number of texts in order to shown how Luke rewrites specific passages. In the final section the contributions concern Luke's relation to Roman authorities. It is shown that Luke's literary creativity is not limited to his predecessors in the gospel tradition. Rewriting is his literary strategy
Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two source hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Luke, --- Authorship. --- Bible --- Bible. --- Criticism, interpretation, etc --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- 226.4 --- 226.1 --- 226.1 Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- Evangelies: synoptici; synoptisch probleem; Q; Quelle --- 226.4 Evangelie volgens Lucas --- 226.4 Evangile de S. Luc --- Evangelie volgens Lucas --- Evangile de S. Luc --- Hypothesis, Two document (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two source (Synoptics criticism) --- Hypothesis, Two sources (Synoptics criticism) --- Two document hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Two sources hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) --- Synoptic problem --- Logia source (Synoptics criticism) --- Q document (Synoptics criticism) --- Sayings source (Synoptics criticism) --- Loukas, --- Luc, --- Lukas, --- Λουκας, --- Acts (Book of the New Testament) --- Acts of the Apostles --- Chongdo haengjŏn --- Sado haengjŏn --- Luc (Book of the New Testament) --- Lucas (Book of the New Testament) --- Luka (Book of the New Testament) --- Lukan săn zăn︠g︡g (Book of the New Testament) --- Lukas (Book of the New Testament) --- Luke (Book of the New Testament) --- Lūqā (Book of the New Testament) --- Nuga pogŭm (Book of the New Testament) --- Ruka den --- Ruka ni yoru fukuinsho --- Luke, - Saint - Authorship. --- Luke, - Saint
Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|