Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
World War --- 1914-1918 --- World War, 1914-1918 --- Guerre, 1914-1918 (Mondiale, 1re) --- Equipment and supplies. --- War work --- Matériel. --- Participation des civils
Choose an application
A popular myth emerged in the late 1990s: in 1900, wars killed one civilian for every eight soldiers, while contemporary wars were killing eight civilians for every one soldier. The neat reversal of numbers was memorable, and academic publications and UN documents regularly cited it. The more it was cited, the more trusted it became. In fact, however, subsequent research found no empirical evidence for the idea that the ratio of civilians to soldiers killed in war has changed dramatically. But while the ratios may not have changed, the political significance of civilian casualties has risen tremendously.Over the past century, civilians in war have gone from having no particular rights to having legal protections and rights that begin to rival those accorded to states. The concern for civilians in conflict has become so strong that governments occasionally undertake humanitarian interventions, at great risk and substantial cost, to protect strangers in distant lands. I n the early 1990s, the UN Security Council authorized military interventions to help feed and protect civilians in the Kurdish area of Iraq, Somalia, and Bosnia. And in May 2011 , Barack Obama 's National Security Advisor explained the United States' decision to support NATO's military intervention in these terms "When the president made this decision, there was an immediate threat to 700,000 Libyan civilians in the town of Benghazi. We've had a success here in terms of being able to protect those civilians."Counting Civilian Casualties aims to promote open scientific dialogue by high lighting the strengths and weaknesses of the most commonly used casualty recording and estimation techniques in an understandable format. Its thirteen chapters, each authoritative but accessible to nonspecialists, explore a variety of approaches, from direct recording to statistical estimation and sampling, to collecting data on civilian deaths caused by conflict. The contributors also discuss their respective advantages and disadvantages, and analyze how figures are used (and misused) by governments, rebels, human rights advocates, war crimes tribunals, and others. In addition to providing analysts with a broad range of tools to produce accurate data, this will be an in valuable resource for policymakers, military officials, jou rnalists, human rights activists, courts, and ordinary people who want to be more informed--and skeptical--consumers of casualty counts.
Civilian war casualties --- Civilians in war --- Guerre civile --- Guerre --- Statistics. --- Case studies --- Pertes --- Statistiques --- Etudes de cas --- Participation des civils --- War --- War and society --- Casualties, Civilian war --- Civilian casualties of war --- War casualties --- Civil War --- Military History --- History
Choose an application
Le temps des hommes doubles : Louis Aragon a désigné ainsi la séparation voire l’opposition entre l’homme social et l’homme privé dans la société capitaliste. Pour les auteurs réunis ici, il s’agit plutôt de signifier qu’au temps de la souveraineté nationale en armes, dès lors que sont plus rigoureusement assignées aux soldats et aux citoyens à la fois une « identité » et une « cause » supposées dépasser leur état civil et leurs intérêts particuliers, l’occupation militaire multiplie, dans la recherche d’une accommodation entre les deux camps, les tensions et les combinaisons possibles entre fonctions ou statuts publics, sociabilités et influences locales, opinions et besoins. Pour caractériser les évolutions qui ont eu lieu entre les guerres déclarées par la France à l’Autriche en 1792 et à la Prusse en 1870, le présent livre met l’accent sur trois thèmes. Il traite d’abord des enjeux politiques et administratifs de l’occupation, parmi lesquels la neutralité, son devenir en tant que concept dans les relations internationales, et le positionnement des États neutres dans des conflits où l’on s’efforce de mobiliser aussi les opinions publiques. L’attention se porte ensuite sur les armées occupantes. Quelle que soit la part d’idéologie que l’autorité politique introduit dans leurs missions, la première de ces missions est de garantir leur propre sécurité. La recherche des accommodements ou le constat de l’extrême difficulté d’en trouver sont enfin abordés du point de vue des sociétés en proie à l’occupation. Dans ces situations où le présent peut être vécu et interprété en fonction d’une mémoire individuelle et collective d’expériences antérieures, le rôle joué par les occupants ne se réduit pas à la brutalité de la soldatesque et à l’exploitation économique. Ainsi, occupants et occupés peuvent aussi être amenés à jouer, même dans un contexte conflictuel, le rôle de passeurs culturels « malgré eux ».
Military occupation --- Civilians in war --- Occupation militaire --- Guerre --- History --- Participation des civils --- Histoire --- Europe --- Civils et guerre --- Forces armées. --- Guerre. --- Histoire. --- Neutralité. --- Occupation militaire. --- Relations civilo-militaires. --- Actes de congrès. --- 1800-1899. --- France --- Europe. --- Histoire militaire --- Sociology & Anthropology --- occupation --- neutralité --- guerre --- armée --- militaire
Choose an application
This is the first account in any language of the civil wars in Europe during the era of the world wars, from 1905 to 1949. It treats the initial confrontations in the decade before World War I, the confusing concept of 'European civil war,' the impact of the world wars, the relation between revolution and civil war and all the individual cases of civil war, with special attention to Russia and Spain. The civil wars of this era are compared and contrasted with earlier internal conflicts, with particular attention to the factors that made this era a time of unusually violent domestic contests, as well as those that brought it to an end. The major political, ideological and social influences are all treated, with a special focus on violence against civilians.
Violence --- Civil war --- Revolutions --- Civilians in war --- War and society --- Social conflict --- Guerre civile --- Révolutions --- Guerre --- Guerre et société --- Conflits sociaux --- History --- Histoire --- Participation des civils --- Europe --- History, Military --- Politics and government --- Social conditions --- Histoire militaire --- Politique et gouvernement --- Conditions sociales --- Révolutions --- Guerre et société --- Class conflict --- Class struggle --- Conflict, Social --- Social tensions --- Interpersonal conflict --- Social psychology --- Sociology --- Society and war --- War --- Sociology, Military --- Insurrections --- Rebellions --- Revolts --- Revolutionary wars --- Political science --- Political violence --- Government, Resistance to --- Violent behavior --- Civil wars --- Intra-state war --- International law --- Social aspects --- Arts and Humanities
Choose an application
Americans are greatly concerned about the number of our troops killed in battle--100,000 dead in World War I; 300,000 in World War II; 33,000 in the Korean War; 58,000 in Vietnam; 4,500 in Iraq; over 1,000 in Afghanistan--and rightly so. But why are we so indifferent, often oblivious, to the far greater number of casualties suffered by those we fight and those we fight for? This is the compelling, largely unasked question John Tirman answers in The Deaths of Others. Between six and seven million people died in Korea, Vietnam, and Iraq alone, the majority of them civilians. And yet Americans de
Battle casualties. --- Civilians in war. --- Militarism --United States. --- United States --Foreign public opinion. --- United States --History, Military --20th century. --- United States --History, Military --21st century. --- United States --Military policy. --- War and society --United States. --- Civilians in war --- Battle casualties --- War and society --- Militarism --- Regions & Countries - Americas --- History & Archaeology --- United States - General --- United States --- History, Military --- Military policy. --- Foreign public opinion. --- Battles --- Casualties, Battle --- Combat casualties --- Casualties --- Foreign opinion --- Combat --- War casualties --- War --- Guerre --- Batailles --- Guerre et société --- Militarisme --- Participation des civils --- Pertes --- Etats-Unis --- Histoire militaire --- Politique militaire --- Opinion publique étrangère
Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|