Listing 1 - 10 of 20 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Première source d'énergie après la Seconde Guerre mondiale jusqu'à la fin des années 50, le charbon est la clé de voûte des relations économiques et diplomatiques entre les États-Unis et l'Europe de l'Ouest. Indispensable à la reconstruction, nécessaire à la stabilisation en Europe, il offre la possibilité aux États-Unis, de par leur influence politique et économique, de structurer un marché. Après 1945, ce marché charbonnier fut tout à la fois à l'image du « monde libre », l'expression du nouvel ordre économique international et de l'intégration européenne. À l'European Coal Organisation (ECO), créée par les Anglais et les Américains en 1945, succéda la Communauté Européenne du Charbon et de l'Acier (CECA) en 1952, alors presque copie conforme. L'Europe si diverse dans ses politiques économiques oscilla face à cette puissance selon les circonstances. En 1958, la grave crise charbonnière met en valeur une mutation de source d'énergie retardée depuis la Libération, et actualise une autre Communauté Européenne.
AA / International- internationaal --- 331.100 --- 334.150.4 --- 331.12 --- 338.733 --- Economische geschiedenis: algemeenheden. --- Europese gemeenschappen. EEG. EGKS. EGA. --- Geschiedenis van de industrie. --- Steenkool. Steenkoolhoudende mineralen. Vaste brandstoffen. --- Coal trade --- Charbon --- Industrie et commerce --- Histoire --- Coal industry --- Fuel trade --- Economische geschiedenis: algemeenheden --- Geschiedenis van de industrie --- Europese gemeenschappen. EEG. EGKS. EGA --- Steenkool. Steenkoolhoudende mineralen. Vaste brandstoffen --- European Coal and Steel Community. --- European coal and steel community --- ECSC. --- Communauté européenne du charbon et de l'acier. --- charbon --- Communauté Européenne du Charbon et de l'Acier --- relations économiques
Choose an application
Mining industry --- Relation between energy and economics --- European Union --- Coal mines and mining --- Charbon --- Technological innovations --- History --- Mines et extraction --- Innovations --- Histoire --- European Coal and Steel Community. --- -Steenkool : onderzoek --- Coal mining --- Collieries --- Energy industries --- Mines and mineral resources --- -History --- -Coal mines and mining --- -Mining industry --- Steenkool : onderzoek
Choose an application
Les mécanismes institutionnels, les évolutions politiques, économiques et juridiques de cinquante ans de construction européenne sont généralement connus. Mais qu'en est-il des hommes ? Bien sûr, de nombreux travaux ont porté sur les figures emblématiques et les héros de la construction européenne. En revanche, tous ceux qui ont été l'Europe, qui l'ont faite au quotidien sont méconnus. Il en est ainsi des biographies des membres de la Haute Autorité de la Communauté européenne du charbon et de l'acier (CECA) que cet ouvrage explore. Dix-neuf hommes ont travaillé à Luxembourg entre 1952 et 1967. Ils appartiennent au mythe de l'institution « pionnière », synonyme de paix et de réconciliation européenne. Qu'en est-il de la réalité de leurs parcours ? D'où viennent-ils ? Comment traversent-ils la Seconde Guerre mondiale et la reconstruction ? Comment deviennent-ils Européens ? Quelle est la place de la Haute Autorité dans leur vie ? L'analyse biographique, en répondant à ces questions, apporte un point de vue nouveau sur les dirigeants de la première communauté et donc sur les institutions européennes en leurs débuts.
European Coal and Steel Community. --- Officials and employees --- History. --- Europe, Western --- Economic integration --- Commission of the European Communities --- West Europe --- Western Europe --- History --- CECA --- communauté européenne du charbon et de l'acier --- fonctionnaire européen --- biographie --- Europe,1975-1970 --- Europe --- 1975-1970
Choose an application
"Jean Monnet (1888-1979) is often viewed as the chief architect of the European Coal and Steel Community, which over time evolved into today's European Union. Monnet spent his early years working as an agent for his father, a cognac producer. It was this experience that took him to Scandinavia, England, the United States, and most importantly Canada, where he was exposed to the country's unique form of federalism. Drawing on a wide variety of empirical sources, including unpublished documents, correspondence, and original historical data extracted from archives both in Canada and Europe, Trygve Ugland's Jean Monnet and Canada argues that the extensive period of time Monnet spent in Canada between 1907 and 1914 had a formative influence on the achievements of his later years, particularly on the institutional 'construction of Europe.'"--Publisher description.
Statesmen --- Monnet, Jean, --- Travel --- European Union --- Hudson's Bay Company --- E.U. --- Compagnie de la Baie d'Hudson --- Adventurers of England Trading into Hudson's Bay --- Governor and Company of Adventurers of England Trading into Hudson's Bay --- Governour and Company of Adventurers of England Trading into Hudson's Bay --- HBC --- Hudson Bay Company --- Hudson Bay Fur Company --- Hudson's Bay Fur Company --- North West Company --- History. --- Employees --- Canada --- Civilization. --- 19th. --- 20th. --- Canada. --- Canadian. --- European Coal and Steel Community. --- European Union. --- Jean Monnet. --- century. --- history.
Choose an application
"The European Court of Justice is widely acknowledged to have played a fundamental role in developing the constitutional law of the EU, having been the first to establish such key doctrines as direct effect, supremacy and parallelism in external relations. Traditionally, EU scholarship has praised the role of the ECJ, with more critical perspectives being given little voice in mainstream EU studies. From the standpoint of legal reasoning, Gerard Conway offers the first sustained critical assessment of how the ECJ engages in its function and offers a new argument as to how it should engage in legal reasoning. He also explains how different approaches to legal reasoning can fundamentally change the outcome of case law and how the constitutional values of the EU justify a different approach to the dominant method of the ECJ"-- "This book seeks to offer a critical perspective on the legal reasoning of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In particular, it focuses on the question of the limits of legal reasoning: how far creativity and freedom from constraint can go in the task of legal reasoning by the EU judiciary. This question has two aspects to it: the epistemic or descriptive possibility of conserving versus creative interpretation and the normative desirability of conserving versus creative interpretation. The argument of the book is that interpretation by the judiciary linked to the understanding or interpretation of the law-maker is both epistemically possible and normatively desirable. This conserving (or orginalist or historical) approach to interpretation coheres much better with the rule of law and democracy, the twin pillars of accepted political morality in Europe, than the relatively creative, teleological approach to interpretation that is widely recognised to be the hallmark of the ECJ"--
Legal theory and methods. Philosophy of law --- European law --- European Communities --- Judicial process --- Law --- Interpretation and construction. --- Methodology. --- Court of Justice of the European Communities. --- LAW / International. --- Acts, Legislative --- Enactments, Legislative --- Laws (Statutes) --- Legislative acts --- Legislative enactments --- Jurisprudence --- Legislation --- Decision making, Judicial --- Judicial behavior --- Judicial decision making --- Judges --- Procedure (Law) --- Psychological aspects --- Interpretation and construction --- Cour de justice des communautés européennes --- Gerichtshof der Europäischen Gemeinschaften --- Corte di giustizia delle comunità europee --- Dikastērion tēs Europaikēs Oikonomikēs Koinotētos --- Hof van Justitie van de Europese Gemeenschappen --- Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas --- GHEG --- European Atomic Energy Community. --- European Economic Community. --- European Court of Justice --- Europäischer Gerichtshof --- Curtea de Justiție a Comunităților Europene --- Ōshū Shihō Saibansho --- G.H.E.G. --- Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades Europeias --- Sud evropeĭskikh soobshchestv --- Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanı --- Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades --- Curia Communitatum Europaearum --- Eurōpaiko Dikastērio --- Dikastērio Eurōpaikōn Koinotētōn --- DEK --- EuGH --- ECJ --- D.E.K. --- Europejski Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- ETS --- Dikastērio tōn Eurōpaikōn Koinotētōn --- CEJ --- European Union. --- European Coal and Steel Community. --- Court of Justice of the European Union --- Methodology --- Law / international. --- LAW / International --- Európai Bíróság --- Judicial process - European Union countries. --- Law - European Union countries - Interpretation and construction. --- Law - European Union countries - Methodology. --- General and Others
Choose an application
In light of the 20th anniversary of the ruling in Francovich, Michael Haba analyzes the principle of Member State Liability, which provides a right to damages whenever EU law is breached by Member States. His research ascertains that the doctrine evolved through three stages before becoming the unified approach that it is today. The author emphasizes that the principle’s base lay at the outset of the EEC, when the ECJ sought means to foster the enforcement of EC law. He shows that although State Liability was introduced in Francovich, there was not enough guidance on its application. He highlights that these matters were resolved in Brasserie/Factortame III, which refined the assessment of culpability, but was inconsistent and had to be further clarified in case law. He illustrates that the doctrine was expanded to breaches of EC law by last instance courts in Köbler. Finally, the author examines if breaches of European competition rules could lead to a right to damages under the principle, but concludes that no fourth stage of State Liability can be established. Contents The principle of State Liability: Francovich Conditions for Applying State Liability: Brasserie/Factortame III Liability for Judicial Breaches of EC Law: Köbler and Traghetti Liability of individuals for breaches of EC Law: Courage and Manfredi Target Groups Students in the field of European Union Law The Author Michael Haba obtained a Master of Arts degree in Business at Management Center Innsbruck, specializing in International Business & Law. .
Economics/Management Science. --- Law and Economics. --- European Law. --- Economics. --- Commercial law. --- Economie politique --- Droit commercial --- Business & Economics --- Economic Theory --- Government liability --- Law --- Court of Justice of the European Communities. --- Cour de justice des communautés européennes --- Gerichtshof der Europäischen Gemeinschaften --- Corte di giustizia delle comunità europee --- Dikastērion tēs Europaikēs Oikonomikēs Koinotētos --- Hof van Justitie van de Europese Gemeenschappen --- Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas --- GHEG --- European Atomic Energy Community. --- European Economic Community. --- European Court of Justice --- Europäischer Gerichtshof --- Curtea de Justiție a Comunităților Europene --- Ōshū Shihō Saibansho --- G.H.E.G. --- Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades Europeias --- Sud evropeĭskikh soobshchestv --- Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanı --- Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades --- Curia Communitatum Europaearum --- Eurōpaiko Dikastērio --- Dikastērio Eurōpaikōn Koinotētōn --- DEK --- EuGH --- ECJ --- D.E.K. --- Europejski Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- ETS --- Dikastērio tōn Eurōpaikōn Koinotētōn --- CEJ --- European Union. --- International law. --- Law and economics. --- European Coal and Steel Community. --- Court of Justice of the European Union --- Economics and jurisprudence --- Economics and law --- Jurisprudence and economics --- Economics --- Jurisprudence --- Law—Europe. --- Europe.
Choose an application
Europe’s constitutional journey has not been a smooth one, and a better division and definition of competence in the European Union is a key issue that needs to be addressed. How can the division of competence be made more transparent? Should there be a reorganization of competence? How can it be ensured that the redefined division of competence will not lead to a creeping expansion of the competence of the Union or to encroachment upon the exclusive areas of competence of the Member States and regions? And how can it be ensured that the European dynamic does not come to a halt? Indeed, has the creeping expansion of the competence of the Union already come to a halt? These are the legal and political questions this book takes as its starting point for an in-depth exploration of the philosophical foundations of European constitutionalism. The Passivity of Law: Competence and Constitution in the European Court of Justice opens with a legal account of the competence creep, including the role that the European Court of Justice plays in it and a sketch of the present division of competences and the main principles regulating it. It then discusses the relationship between constituent power and constituted or constitutional power from the viewpoint of the history of constitutional theory before offering an alternative interpretation of their relationship, the “chiastic theory,” which is based on the philosophical investigations of M. Merleau-Ponty. It details how this chiastic approach can be used to make sense of the Court’s role in the competence creep in general and the doctrine of implied powers in particular, and it utilizes several case studies concerning competences to sustain this claim. Aimed at researchers and practitioners in Philosophy, Phenomenology, Political Science, the Social Sciences and numerous fields of law, this monograph is a seminal work in the evolving theory and practice of EU (constitutional) law.
Competent authority -- European Union countries. --- Constitutional law -- European Union countries. --- Court of Justice of the European Communities. --- Law - Non-U.S. --- Philosophy & Religion --- Law, Politics & Government --- Law - Europe, except U.K. --- Philosophy --- Constitutional law --- Cour de justice des communautés européennes --- Gerichtshof der Europäischen Gemeinschaften --- Corte di giustizia delle comunità europee --- Dikastērion tēs Europaikēs Oikonomikēs Koinotētos --- Hof van Justitie van de Europese Gemeenschappen --- Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas --- GHEG --- European Atomic Energy Community. --- European Economic Community. --- European Court of Justice --- Europäischer Gerichtshof --- Curtea de Justiție a Comunităților Europene --- Ōshū Shihō Saibansho --- G.H.E.G. --- Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades Europeias --- Sud evropeĭskikh soobshchestv --- Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanı --- Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades --- Curia Communitatum Europaearum --- Eurōpaiko Dikastērio --- Dikastērio Eurōpaikōn Koinotētōn --- DEK --- EuGH --- ECJ --- D.E.K. --- Europejski Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- ETS --- Dikastērio tōn Eurōpaikōn Koinotētōn --- CEJ --- European Union. --- Philosophy. --- Political science. --- Phenomenology. --- Law --- Law. --- Public international law. --- Philosophy of Law. --- Public International Law. --- Political Science. --- Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. --- European Coal and Steel Community. --- Court of Justice of the European Union --- Philosophy of law. --- Phenomenology . --- Public International Law . --- Philosophy, Modern --- Administration --- Civil government --- Commonwealth, The --- Government --- Political theory --- Political thought --- Politics --- Science, Political --- Social sciences --- State, The --- Law—Philosophy. --- Acts, Legislative --- Enactments, Legislative --- Laws (Statutes) --- Legislative acts --- Legislative enactments --- Jurisprudence --- Legislation --- Law of nations --- Nations, Law of --- Public international law
Choose an application
After developing and testing a theory of integration, Alec Stone Sweet assesses the impact of the European Court of Justice on the politics of trade, sex equality, and environmental protection in the European Union.
International relations. Foreign policy --- European Union --- Political questions and judicial power --- Constitutional law --- Politique et pouvoir judiciaire --- Droit constitutionnel --- Court of Justice of the European Communities --- Court of Justice of the European Communities. --- European Union. --- Judicial activism --- Judicial power and political questions --- Act of state --- Administrative discretion --- Judicial review --- Jurisdiction --- Law --- Rule of law --- Separation of powers --- Political aspects --- Cour de justice des communautés européennes --- Gerichtshof der Europäischen Gemeinschaften --- Corte di giustizia delle comunità europee --- Dikastērion tēs Europaikēs Oikonomikēs Koinotētos --- Hof van Justitie van de Europese Gemeenschappen --- Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas --- GHEG --- European Atomic Energy Community. --- European Economic Community. --- European Court of Justice --- Europäischer Gerichtshof --- Curtea de Justiție a Comunităților Europene --- Ōshū Shihō Saibansho --- G.H.E.G. --- Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades Europeias --- Sud evropeĭskikh soobshchestv --- Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanı --- Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades --- Curia Communitatum Europaearum --- Eurōpaiko Dikastērio --- Dikastērio Eurōpaikōn Koinotētōn --- DEK --- EuGH --- ECJ --- D.E.K. --- Europejski Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- ETS --- Dikastērio tōn Eurōpaikōn Koinotētōn --- CEJ --- Európai Bíróság --- European Coal and Steel Community. --- Court of Justice of the European Union --- E.U. --- Constitutional law - European Union countries. --- Political questions and judicial power - European Union countries.
Choose an application
Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy.Examining the judicial argumentation of the United States Supreme Court and of the French Cour de cassation, the book first reorders the traditional comparative understanding of the difference between French civil law and American common law judicial decision-making. It then uses this analysis to offer the first detailed
Judicial process --- France. --- United States. --- Court of Justice of the European Communities. --- Decision making, Judicial --- Judicial behavior --- Judicial decision making --- Cour de justice des communautés européennes --- Gerichtshof der Europäischen Gemeinschaften --- Corte di giustizia delle comunità europee --- Dikastērion tēs Europaikēs Oikonomikēs Koinotētos --- Hof van Justitie van de Europese Gemeenschappen --- Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas --- GHEG --- European Atomic Energy Community. --- European Economic Community. --- European Court of Justice --- Europäischer Gerichtshof --- Curtea de Justiție a Comunităților Europene --- Ōshū Shihō Saibansho --- G.H.E.G. --- Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades Europeias --- Sud evropeĭskikh soobshchestv --- Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanı --- Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades --- Curia Communitatum Europaearum --- Eurōpaiko Dikastērio --- Dikastērio Eurōpaikōn Koinotētōn --- DEK --- EuGH --- ECJ --- D.E.K. --- Europejski Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- ETS --- Dikastērio tōn Eurōpaikōn Koinotētōn --- CEJ --- European Union. --- Supreme Court (U.S.) --- Chief Justice of the United States --- Supreme Court of the United States --- 美國. --- Judges --- Law --- Procedure (Law) --- Psychological aspects --- Interpretation and construction --- European Coal and Steel Community. --- Court of Justice of the European Union --- Európai Bíróság
Choose an application
The book entitled 'The Greatest Possible Freedom' tells the story of natural persons in the internal market. The first part contains a thick chronological description of the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on free movement of persons and services, including the hitherto largely neglected coordination of social security. In this sizeable body of case-law including roughly 1400 decisions the book then traces the evolution and spin of certain interpretive formulas. Broad formulas like the greatest possible freedom or coordinative formulas like simple coordination are thus examined and their almost eerie power comes to light.
Freedom of movement --- Court of Justice of the European Communities. --- Movement, Freedom of --- Civil rights --- Domicile --- Emigration and immigration law --- Industrial laws and legislation --- Labor laws and legislation --- Liberty --- Personality (Law) --- Cour de justice des communautés européennes --- Gerichtshof der Europäischen Gemeinschaften --- Corte di giustizia delle comunità europee --- Dikastērion tēs Europaikēs Oikonomikēs Koinotētos --- Hof van Justitie van de Europese Gemeenschappen --- Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas --- GHEG --- European Atomic Energy Community. --- European Economic Community. --- European Court of Justice --- Europäischer Gerichtshof --- Curtea de Justiție a Comunităților Europene --- Ōshū Shihō Saibansho --- G.H.E.G. --- Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades Europeias --- Sud evropeĭskikh soobshchestv --- Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanı --- Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades --- Curia Communitatum Europaearum --- Eurōpaiko Dikastērio --- Dikastērio Eurōpaikōn Koinotētōn --- DEK --- EuGH --- ECJ --- D.E.K. --- Europejski Trybunał Sprawiedliwości --- ETS --- Dikastērio tōn Eurōpaikōn Koinotētōn --- CEJ --- European Union. --- European Coal and Steel Community. --- Court of Justice of the European Union --- Európai Bíróság --- Freiheit --- Fallrecht --- case law
Listing 1 - 10 of 20 | << page >> |
Sort by
|