Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A dramatic account of the fateful year leading to the ultimate crisis of the Roman Republic and the rise of Caesar's autocracy When the Senate ordered Julius Caesar, conqueror of Gaul, to disband his troops, he instead marched his soldiers across the Rubicon River, in violation of Roman law. The Senate turned to its proconsul, Pompey the Great, for help. But Pompey's response was unexpected: he commanded magistrates and senators to abandon Rome-a city that, until then, had always been defended. The consequences were the ultimate crisis of the Roman Republic and the rise of Caesar's autocracy. In this new history, Luca Fezzi argues that Pompey's actions sealed the Republic's fate. Drawing on a wide range of primary sources, including Cicero's extensive letters, Fezzi shows how Pompey's decision shocked the Roman people, severely weakened the city, and set in motion a chain of events that allowed Caesar to take power. Seamlessly translated by Richard Dixon, this book casts fresh light on the dramatic events of this crucial moment in ancient Roman history.

Caesar, Julius. --- Pompey, --- 265-30 B.C. --- Rome --- History

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Caesar --- Julius --- Rome --- History --- Republic --- 265-30 B.C.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Caesar --- Julius --- Rome --- History --- Republic --- 265-30 B.C.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In recent decades, scholars have argued that the Roman Republic's political culture was essentially democratic in nature, stressing the central role of the 'sovereign' people and their assemblies. Karl-J. Hölkeskamp challenges this view in Reconstructing the Roman Republic, warning that this scholarly trend threatens to become the new orthodoxy, and defending the position that the republic was in fact a uniquely Roman, dominantly oligarchic and aristocratic political form. Hölkeskamp offers a comprehensive, in-depth survey of the modern debate surrounding the Roman Republic. He looks at the ongoing controversy first triggered in the 1980s when the 'oligarchic orthodoxy' was called into question by the idea that the republic's political culture was a form of Greek-style democracy, and he considers the important theoretical and methodological advances of the 1960s and 1970s that prepared the ground for this debate. Hölkeskamp renews and refines the 'elitist' view, showing how the republic was a unique kind of premodern city-state political culture shaped by a specific variant of a political class. He covers a host of fascinating topics, including the Roman value system; the senatorial aristocracy; competition in war and politics within this aristocracy; and the symbolic language of public rituals and ceremonies, monuments, architecture, and urban topography. Certain to inspire continued debate, Reconstructing the Roman Republic offers fresh approaches to the study of the republic while attesting to the field's enduring vitality.Some images inside the book are unavailable due to digital copyright restrictions.

Rome --- Politics and government --- History --- Politique et gouvernement --- Histoire --- HISTORY / Ancient / Rome. --- Rome - Politics and government - 265-30 B.C. --- Rome - History - Republic, 265-30 B.C.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Caesar --- Julius --- Juvenile fiction --- Gaul --- History --- Gallic Wars --- 58-51 B.C. --- Rome --- Republic --- 265-30 B.C.