Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Pragmatism and its consequences are central issues in American politics today, yet scholars rarely examine in detail the relationship between pragmatism and politics. In The Priority of Democracy, Jack Knight and James Johnson systematically explore the subject and make a strong case for adopting a pragmatist approach to democratic politics--and for giving priority to democracy in the process of selecting and reforming political institutions. What is the primary value of democracy? When should we make decisions democratically and when should we rely on markets? And when should we accept the decisions of unelected officials, such as judges or bureaucrats? Knight and Johnson explore how a commitment to pragmatism should affect our answers to such important questions. They conclude that democracy is a good way of determining how these kinds of decisions should be made--even if what the democratic process determines is that not all decisions should be made democratically. So, for example, the democratically elected U.S. Congress may legitimately remove monetary policy from democratic decision-making by putting it under the control of the Federal Reserve. Knight and Johnson argue that pragmatism offers an original and compelling justification of democracy in terms of the unique contributions democratic institutions can make to processes of institutional choice. This focus highlights the important role that democracy plays, not in achieving consensus or commonality, but rather in addressing conflicts. Indeed, Knight and Johnson suggest that democratic politics is perhaps best seen less as a way of reaching consensus or agreement than as a way of structuring the terms of persistent disagreement.
Democracy --- Philosophy. --- American politics. --- U.S. Congress. --- ambiguity. --- anti-skepticism. --- argument. --- bureaucracy. --- collective decision making. --- collective decision. --- collective decisions. --- collective outcomes. --- consequentialism. --- decentralized markets. --- decentralized mechanisms. --- democracy. --- democratic argument. --- democratic arrangements. --- democratic competition. --- democratic decision making. --- democratic institutional framework. --- democratic institutions. --- democratic politics. --- democratic process. --- democratic processes. --- diversity. --- effective participation. --- equal political participation. --- equality. --- fallibilism. --- formal decision making. --- free-and-equal-participation. --- freedom. --- individual participation. --- instability. --- institutional arrangements. --- institutional choice. --- institutional performance. --- judicial decision making. --- liberalism. --- markets. --- political argument. --- political consequences. --- political debate. --- political-economic institutions. --- populism. --- pragmatism. --- reflexivity. --- social choice theory. --- social choice. --- social cooperation. --- social disagreement. --- social interaction. --- social norms. --- voting. --- Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Political sociology --- Political systems
Choose an application
Reclaiming public life from the ideologies of both communist regimes and neoliberalism, their projects have harnessed the politically subversive potential of social relations based on trust, reciprocity and solidarity. Drawing on archival material and exclusive interviews, in this book Izabel Galliera traces the development of socially engaged art from the early 1990s to the present in Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania. She demonstrates that, in the early 1990s, projects were primarily created for exhibitions organized and funded by the Soros Centers for Contemporary Art. In the early 2000s, prior to Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania entering into the European Union, EU institutions likewise funded socially-conscious public art in the region. Today, socially engaged art is characterised by the proliferation of independent and often self-funded artists' initiatives in cities such as Sofia, Bucharest and Budapest. Focusing on the relationships between art, social capital and civil society, Galliera employs sociological and political theories to reveal that, while social capital is generally considered a mechanism of exclusion in the West, in post-socialist contexts it has been leveraged by artists and curators as a vital means of communication and action.
Art, Modern --- Art, European. --- Socialism --- European art --- Nouveaux réalistes (Group of artists) --- Zaj (Group of artists) --- Affichistes (Group of artists) --- Fluxus (Group of artists) --- Modernism (Art) --- Schule der Neuen Prächtigkeit (Group of artists) --- Zero (Group of artists) --- Art --- Social movements in art --- Social practice (Art) --- Communism and art --- Socialism and art --- Interventionist art --- Social cooperation (Art) --- Socially engaged art --- Art and society --- Interactive art --- Art and socialism --- Art and communism --- Art, Occidental --- Art, Visual --- Art, Western (Western countries) --- Arts, Fine --- Arts, Visual --- Fine arts --- Iconography --- Occidental art --- Visual arts --- Western art (Western countries) --- Arts --- Aesthetics --- Political aspects --- Social movements in art. --- Art, Primitive
Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|