Narrow your search

Library

LUCA School of Arts (3)

Odisee (3)

Thomas More Kempen (3)

Thomas More Mechelen (3)

UCLL (3)

VIVES (3)

VUB (2)

FARO (1)

KU Leuven (1)

ULB (1)

More...

Resource type

book (3)


Language

English (3)


Year
From To Submit

2017 (1)

2010 (1)

2008 (1)

Listing 1 - 3 of 3
Sort by

Book
Anthony Burgess and France
Authors: ---
ISBN: 9781443891516 1443891517 1443851744 9781443851749 Year: 2017 Publisher: Newcastle upon Tyne

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract


Book
Adventures of Alf. Wilson : a thrilling episode of the dark days of the rebellion
Author:
ISBN: 1582188556 9781582188553 1582187894 9781582187891 9781582187891 Year: 2008 Publisher: Scituate, MA : Digital Scanning, Inc.,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract


Book
Knowledge as a mental state? : a study on Oxford realism
Author:
ISBN: 3832589864 Year: 2010 Publisher: Berlin : Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Long description: Subject of this book is an epistemological consideration concerning the nature of knowledge. But other than the most essays on the subject of knowledge, here I am going to deal with a largely overlooked account to try to find an answer to the question of knowledge. This is the mental state account of knowledge. Or to put it into the main question: is knowledge a mental state? Now, the question is: Why is the epistemic thinking of Cook Wilson, Prichard and Austin afflicted with such ignorance in contemporary epistemic discussions? The answer is: an unreflected Platonian heritage during 2000 years of epistemic thinking -- a notion which is similar to a point Hetherington has called ``epistemic absolutism''. So my main conclusion here is: the JTB thesis (knowledge is some aspect of justified true belief) is insufficient in order to give an account of the nature of knowledge. A consequence from this is: all the epistemic theories which are dealing with the JTB thesis are based on deficient assumptions. Hence their results -- notably the well-known externalism/internalism debate - are insufficient, too. So, there is a need for a new theory of knowledge based on the MS thesis.

Listing 1 - 3 of 3
Sort by