Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
The central argument of Japan and the Enemies of Open Political Science is that Eurocentric blindness is not a moral but a scientific failing. In this wide-ranging critique of Western social science, Anglo-American philosophy and French theory, Williams works on the premise that Japan is the most important political system of our time. He explains why social scientists have been so keen to ignore or denigrate Japan's achievements. If social science is to meet the needs of the Pacific Century', it requires a sustained act of intellectual demolition and subsequent renewal.
Social sciences --- Political science --- Social Sciences --- Social Sciences - General --- Philosophy --- Research --- Politics --- Japan --- Social Sciences And State --- Political Science --- Social Science --- Social sciences and state --- Social science --- Philosophy. --- Research.
Choose an application
This book addresses two important matters of current concern to Middle East scholars: firstly, the nature of the Egyptian state and society and the interactive process between them and secondly, how change, which would finally lead to development, can be initiated. The book argues that the Egyptian case represents a weak authoritarian state, which through its coercive and repressive policies towards various societal forces, political parties, professional associations and organisations and individuals, creates a weak society. Individual behaviour in urban and rural communities, sometimes viewe
Egypt --- Egypte --- Politics and government --- Politique et gouvernement --- Politics and government. --- Political science --- Social sciences and state --- Administration --- Civil government --- Commonwealth, The --- Government --- Political theory --- Political thought --- Politics --- Science, Political --- Social sciences --- State, The --- State and social sciences --- Cultural policy
Choose an application
Social scientists have played many roles in Canadian politics since the Second World War. Stephen Brooks and Alain Gagnon examine the forms and extent of social scientists' involvement in the political process, their relationship to the state, and the complexities of their class position. The unique development of the social sciences in Quebec and their relationship to Quebec nationalism are examined and distinctions between development in this community and in the predominantly anglophone community of the rest of Canada are contrasted.
Social scientists --- Social sciences and state --- State and social sciences --- Cultural policy --- Scientists --- Policy scientists --- Social conditions. --- History --- Québec (Province) --- Politics and government --- Quebec (Province) --- Canada --- Politics and government.
Choose an application
Le concept de risque est un terme ancien, qui viendrait, via l'italien risico ou l'espagnol riesgo, du latin resecumqui signifie ce qui coupe. Comme menace, le risque est étroitement associé au régime de l'assurance depuis le XVIe siècle. Depuis, il n'a cessé de se developper comme mode de gouvernementalité des hommes et des populations. Ces dernières années, société du risque et principe de précaution ont fait leur apparition, pour dési-gner une nouvelle génération de dangers non prévisibles et non assurables, mais sans doute aussi pour souligner un changement assez significatif de notre rapport à la science, aux normes et à la responsabilité dans le cadre de société dites «réflexives». Mais depuis Pascal et son célèbre pari, le risque est aussi valeur positive, synonyme de choix en contexte d'incertitude. Dans cette dimension, le risque en tant que prise de risquerenvoie à la part de liberté et de responsabilité que tout homme est condamné à assumer. Alea iacta est... Qu'est-ce que le risque? Que signifie société du risque? Quels changements dans les modes de gouvernementalité le concept de risque introduit-il dans les politiques publiques (sociales, pénales, familiales, de la santé)? Quels enjeux philosophiques le risque pose-t-il dans des sociétés victimaires qui font volontiers l'apologie de l'homme précautionneux et l'éloge du risque zéro? C'est autour de ces questions qu'est construit cet ouvrage, fruit d'un séminaire de deux ans mené par le Réseau Interdisciplinarité et Société (RIS) aux Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis
Organization theory --- Affective and dynamic functions --- Social psychology --- Risk --- Risk management --- Risque --- Gestion du risque --- Political aspects --- Sociological aspects --- Aspect politique --- Aspect sociologique --- Prise de risque --- Sociologie du risque --- Politique publique --- Sociologie --- Philosophy --- Prise de risque. --- Politique publique. --- Sociologie. --- Monograph --- Sociology --- risque --- politique publique --- prise de risque --- choix --- société du risque --- philosophie --- société victimaire --- ambivalence --- Social sciences and state
Choose an application
During the height of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Pentagon launched a controversial counterinsurgency program called the Human Terrain System. The program embedded social scientists within military units to provide commanders with information about the cultures and grievances of local populations. Yet the controversy it inspired was not new. Decades earlier, similar national security concerns brought the Department of Defense and American social scientists together in the search for intellectual weapons that could combat the spread of communism during the Cold War. In Armed with Expertise, Joy Rohde traces the optimistic rise, anguished fall, and surprising rebirth of Cold War-era military-sponsored social research. Seeking expert knowledge that would enable the United States to contain communism, the Pentagon turned to social scientists. Beginning in the 1950's, political scientists, social psychologists, and anthropologists optimistically applied their expertise to military problems, convinced that their work would enhance democracy around the world. As Rohde shows, by the late 1960's, a growing number of scholars and activists condemned Pentagon-funded social scientists as handmaidens of a technocratic warfare state and sought to eliminate military-sponsored research from American intellectual life. But the Pentagon's social research projects had remarkable institutional momentum and intellectual flexibility. Instead of severing their ties to the military, the Pentagon's experts relocated to a burgeoning network of private consulting agencies and for-profit research offices. Now shielded from public scrutiny, they continued to influence national security affairs. They also diversified their portfolios to include the study of domestic problems, including urban violence and racial conflict. In examining the controversies over Cold War social science, Rohde reveals the persistent militarization of American political and intellectual life, a phenomenon that continues to raise grave questions about the relationship between expert knowledge and American democracy.
Social sciences --- Sociology, Military --- Social sciences and state --- Cold War --- State and social sciences --- Cultural policy --- Military sociology --- Armed Forces --- Armies --- Peace --- War --- War and society --- Behavioral sciences --- Human sciences --- Sciences, Social --- Social science --- Social studies --- Civilization --- Research --- History --- Social aspects
Choose an application
Cause is a problematic concept in social science, as in all fields of knowledge. We organise information in terms of cause and effect to impose order on the world, but this can impede a more sophisticated understanding. In his latest book, Richard Ned Lebow reviews understandings of cause in physics and philosophy and concludes that no formulation is logically defensible and universal in its coverage. This is because cause is not a feature of the world but a cognitive shorthand we use to make sense of it. In practice, causal inference is always rhetorical and must accordingly be judged on grounds of practicality. Lebow offers a new approach - 'inefficient causation' - that is constructivist in its emphasis on the reasons people have for acting as they do, but turns to other approaches to understand the aggregation of their behaviour. This novel approach builds on general understandings and idiosyncratic features of context.
Philosophy of science --- International relations. Foreign policy --- International relations. --- Social sciences and state. --- State and social sciences --- Cultural policy --- Coexistence --- Foreign affairs --- Foreign policy --- Foreign relations --- Global governance --- Interdependence of nations --- International affairs --- Peaceful coexistence --- World order --- National security --- Sovereignty --- World politics
Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|