Abstract | Keywords | Export | Availability | Bookmark

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The frontier between 'law' and 'politics' is not always clear-cut. A large area exists where courts operate, but where governments and parliaments also make decisions. Tim Koopmans compares the way American, British, French and German law and politics deal with different issues: in many instances subjects which are highly 'political' in one country constitute legal issues in another. Is there, for example a 'sovereign Parliament' (as there is in Britain), or will courts control the compatibility of statutes with the Constitution (as in the United States and Germany)? How far can courts go in controlling the legality of administrative action? Are there general legal theories about the frontier between what courts and what politics can do? Koopmans considers case law on a range of issues, including human rights protection, federalism, separation of powers, equal protection and the impact of European and international law.

Comparative law. --- Courts. --- Justice, Administration of. --- Law --- Political aspects. --- Law of civil procedure --- Politics --- France --- United States --- Great Britain --- Germany --- Courts --- Justice, Administration of --- Comparative law --- Tribunaux --- Justice --- Droit et politique --- Droit comparé --- Administration --- General and Others --- Comparative jurisprudence --- Comparative legislation --- Jurisprudence, Comparative --- Law, Comparative --- Legislation, Comparative --- Law and politics --- Administration of justice --- Judiciary --- Dispute resolution (Law) --- Judicial districts --- Procedure (Law) --- Judicial power --- Jurisdiction --- Law and legislation --- United States of America --- DROIT PUBLIC COMPARE --- SEPARATION DES POUVOIRS --- POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE --- CONSTITUTIONNALITE DES LOIS --- LEGALITE DES ACTES ADMINISTRATIFS