Listing 1 - 10 of 345 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Discussion. --- Group discussion --- Conversation --- Debates and debating --- Leadership --- Meetings
Choose an application
Prominent observers complain that public discourse in America is shallow and unedifying -- This debased conditions often attributed to, among other things, the resurgence of religion in public life. Steven D. Smith argues that this diagnosis has the matter backwards: it is not primarily religion but rather the strictures of secular rationalism that have drained our modern discourse of force and authenticity. Thus Rawlsian "public reason" filters appeals to religion or "other comprehensive doctrines" out of public deliberation. But these restrictions have the effect of excluding our deepest normative commitments, virtually assuring that the discourse will be shallow. Furthermore, because we cannot defend our normative positions without resorting to convictions that secular discourse deems inadmissible, we are frequently forced to smuggle in those convictions under the guise of benign notions such as freedom and equality. Smith suggests that this sort of smuggling is pervasive in modern secular discourse. He shows this by considering a series of controversial, contemporary issues, including the Supreme Court's assisted-suicide decisions, the "harm principle," separation of church and state, and freedom of conscience. He concludes by suggesting that it is possible and desirable to free public discourse of the constraints associated with secularism and "public reason."
Secularism. --- Church and state. --- Discussion --- Secularism
Choose an application
Internet --- Electronic discussion groups --- Social aspects.
Choose an application
In liberal democracies committed to tolerating diversity as well as disagreement, the loss of civility in the public sphere seems critical. But is civility really a virtue, or a demand for conformity that silences dissent? Teresa Bejan looks at early modern debates about religious toleration for answers about what a civil society should look like.
Courtesy --- Toleration --- Discussion --- Freedom of speech. --- Forums (Discussion and debate) --- Political aspects. --- History.
Choose an application
"This book is a contribution to the philosophical discourse on education. Education is considered as a tool of philosophy. Education (paideia) and politics (politeia) are equal in importance for building a sustainable society free from feud and unhappiness. Discursive thinking through of education is based on Plato's dialogues and the results of epistemological, metaphysical and ethical research in the fields of cosmology, biology and neuroscience. The author demonstrates the potential of the threefold scheme of philosophy, a Platone philosophandi ratio triplex, for ordering individual and collective discourse and way of life in strict accordance with the intelligible complexity of the expanding cosmos. An essential read for students and scholars interested in the crossroad between education and philosophy"-- Provided by publisher.
Plato --- Education --- Education, Greek. --- Thought and thinking. --- Discussion. --- Influence. --- Philosophy.
Choose an application
Inquiry-based learning. --- Interaction analysis in education. --- Discussion.
Choose an application
Political participation --- Politics, Practical --- Citizenship --- Forums (Discussion and debate) --- Democracy
Choose an application
If you have ever been apprehensive about initiating classroom discussion, fearing silences, the domination of a couple of speakers, superficial contributions, or off-topic remarks, this book provides strategies for creating a positive learning experience.
Discussion --- Inquiry-based learning. --- Group work in education. --- Forums (Discussion and debate) --- Classroom management. --- Study and teaching.
Choose an application
How do the ways we argue represent a practical philosophy or a way of life? Are concepts of character and ethos pertinent to our understanding of academic debate? In this book, Amanda Anderson analyzes arguments in literary, cultural, and political theory, with special attention to the ways in which theorists understand ideals of critical distance, forms of subjective experience, and the determinants of belief and practice. Drawing on the resources of the liberal and rationalist tradition, Anderson interrogates the limits of identity politics and poststructuralism while holding to the importance of theory as a form of life. Considering high-profile trends as well as less noted patterns of argument, The Way We Argue Now addresses work in feminism, new historicism, queer theory, postcolonialism, cosmopolitanism, pragmatism, and proceduralism. The essays brought together here--lucid, precise, rigorously argued--combine pointed critique with an appreciative assessment of the productive internal contests and creative developments across these influential bodies of thought. Ultimately, The Way We Argue Now promotes a revitalized culture of argument through a richer understanding of the ways critical reason is practiced at the individual, collective, and institutional levels. Bringing to the fore the complexities of academic debate while shifting the terms by which we assess the continued influence of theory, it will appeal to readers interested in political theory, literary studies, cultural studies, gender studies, and the place of academic culture in society and politics.
Debates and debating. --- Discussion. --- Reasoning. --- Theory (Philosophy). --- Theory (Philosophy) --- Argumentation --- Speaking --- Group discussion --- Ratiocination --- Elocution --- Forensics (Public speaking) --- Public speaking --- Rhetoric --- Discussion --- Oratory --- Conversation --- Debates and debating --- Leadership --- Meetings --- Reason --- Thought and thinking --- Judgment (Logic) --- Logic --- Philosophy --- Reasoning
Choose an application
Le genre du forum, à travers ses formes primitives que sont les listes et groupes de discussions électroniques, structure la réinvention d’une communication savante dans l’univers technique des réseaux numériques. En retour, les discussions en forum révèlent les logiques sociales des pratiques du savoir de la fin du deuxième millénaire. Réinvestissant le long héritage de l’échange savant depuis le projet moderne des Lumières, ces outils de communication manifestent une réflexivité explicite entre technè et épistémè. Instruments de la science en train d’être discutée, ils témoignent d’un contexte où l’ingénierie des sciences et les technologies intellectuelles deviennent des valeurs centrales dans une économie de la connaissance. Ils offrent ainsi un éclairage anthropologique, sociologique, politique, voire géopolitique sur la manière dont le champ scientifique envisage et structure sa communication informelle et publique, témoignant de son rapport à la société, à l’intérieur, aux marges et à l’extérieur de l’espace du professionnel savant. Ce faisant, le forum est autant une forme du savoir réticulaire – qui prend la forme logicielle et sociale d’un réseau – qu’un lieu de savoir qui sédimente et identifie des objets et pratiques du savoir en environnement numérique.
Humanities, Multidisciplinary --- Library, Information & Communication sciences --- Internet --- web --- Forum internet --- savoir --- Liste de discussion --- discussion list --- Forum --- knowledge
Listing 1 - 10 of 345 | << page >> |
Sort by
|