Listing 1 - 10 of 98 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
According to various renowned commentaries on the German Civil Code, the principle that ambiguities are to be borne by the user of general terms and conditions (Section 305c (2) BGB) should also apply to automated declarations of intent. The extent to which this view deserves approval is questioned, taking into account findings from the legal history of the ambiguity rule, but also with recourse to legal economics and comparative law, and then it is explored whether this intention actually deserves legal approval.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Το Ολοκαύτωμα άρχισε με την αποπροσωποποίηση των θυμάτων και κατέληξε στην αποπροσωποποίηση των θυτών. Το ναζιστικό ιατρικό κατεστημένο ξεκίνησε με το να αποπροσωποποιεί τους ασθενείς και κατέληξε στη διάπραξη γενοκτονίας. Ένας από τους στόχους αυτού του εγχειριδίου είναι να ανα-προσωποποιήσει τόσο τους δράστες, όσο και τους θύματα. Εάν δώσουμε όνομα σε έναν γιατρό-θύτη, ένα θύμα των σκληρών διαδικασιών ή σε έναν ιατρό που ήταν αιχμάλωτος σε ναζιστικό γκέτο ή στρατόπεδο συγκέντρωσης μας, αυτό θα μας κάνει όλους να συνειδητοποιήσουμε ότι είμαστε πρωτίστως ευάλωτοι άνθρωποι, και μόνον δευτερευόντως επαγγελματίες ιατροί. Η εξατομίκευση αυτών των ιστορικών γεγονότων μας παρακινεί να κοιτάξουμε εκ νέου τους εαυτούς μας και να αναζητήσουμε μέσα μας, και μέσα στις κοινωνίες μας, το βάρος και την ευθύνη που όλοι φέρουμε για την ανθρωπότητα και για την ευημερία της ίδιας της ιατρικής. Η εξέταση των βιοηθικών ζητημάτων που συνδέονται με το Ολοκαύτωμα και της συνενοχής της γερμανικής ιατρικής προσφέρει ένα καίριο πρίσμα που μπορεί να βοηθήσει σε αυτό το δύσκολο αλλά επιτακτικό έργο.
Declaration of Helsinki --- Germany --- medical professionals --- Germany.
Choose an application
"The invasion of Iraq in 2003, and the Coalition Government's failure to win parliamentary approval for armed intervention in Syria in 2013, mark a period of increased scrutiny of the process by which the UK engages in armed conflict. For much of the media and civil society there now exists a constitutional convention which mandates that the Government consults Parliament before commencing hostilities. This is celebrated as representing a redistribution of power from the executive towards a more legitimate, democratic institution. This book offers a critical inquiry into Parliament's role in the war prerogative since the beginning of the twentieth century, evaluating whether the UK's decisions to engage in conflict meet the recognised standards of good governance: accountability, transparency and participation. The analysis reveals a number of persistent problems in the decision-making process, including Parliament's lack of access to relevant information, government 'legalisation' of parliamentary debates which frustrates broader discussions of political legitimacy, and the skewing of debates via the partial public disclosure of information based upon secret intelligence. The book offers solutions to these problems to reinvigorate parliamentary discourse and to address government withholding of classified information. It is essential reading for anyone interested in war powers, the relationship between international law and domestic politics, and the role of the Westminster Parliament in questions of national security."--Bloomsbury Publishing.
Prerogative, Royal --- War and emergency legislation --- War, Declaration of
Choose an application
War, Declaration of --- United States --- Politics and government
Choose an application
Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution vests in Congress the power ""to declare War."" Pursuant to that power, Congress has enacted 11 declarations of war during the course of American history relating to five different wars, the most recent being those that were adopted during World War II. In addition, Congress has adopted a number of authorizations for the use of military force, the most recent being the joint resolution enacted on October 16, 2002, authorizing the use of military force against Iraq. To buttress the nation's ability to prosecute a war or armed conflict, Congress has also
War, Declaration of --- War and emergency powers --- United States.
Choose an application
John D. Koch, Jr. untersucht die aktuelle Debatte um die Beziehung zwischen der Unterscheidung von Gesetz und Evangelium und der Lehre von der Rechtfertigung durch den Glauben, die in verschiedenen theologischen Schulen diskutiert wird.
Reformation --- Justification --- Joint Declaration --- Praktische Theologie --- Systematische Theologie
Choose an application
Declaring War directly challenges the 200-year-old belief that Congress can and should declare war. By offering a detailed analysis of the declarations of 1812, 1898 and the War Powers Resolution of 1973, the book demonstrates the extent of the organizational and moral incapacity of Congress to declare war. It invokes Carl von Clausewitz's dictum that 'war is policy' to explain why declarations of war are an integral part of war and proposes two possible remedies - a constitutional amendment or, alternatively, a significant re-organization of Congress. It offers a comprehensive historical, legal, constitutional, moral and philosophical analysis of why Congress has failed to check an imperial presidency. The book draws on Roman history and international law to clarify the form, function and language of declarations of war and John Austin's speech act theory.
War and emergency powers --- War, Declaration of --- Declaration of war --- Hostilities --- War (International law) --- Presidents --- Law --- General and Others
Choose an application
American Soul brings together a variety of primary source documents related to the contested meaning and legacy of the Declaration of Independence, and the various speeches and writings assembled together demonstrate how competing interpretations of the Declaration have shaped, and been shaped by, two and a half centuries of political conflict in America.
Listing 1 - 10 of 98 | << page >> |
Sort by
|