Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Court of Injustice reveals how immigration lawyers work to achieve just results for their clients in a system that has long denigrated the rights of those they serve. J.C. Salyer specifically investigates immigration enforcement in New York City, following individual migrants, their lawyers, and the NGOs that serve them into the immigration courtrooms that decide their cases. This book is an account of the effects of the implementation of U.S. immigration law and policy. Salyer engages directly with the specific laws and procedures that mandate harsh and inhumane outcomes for migrants and their families. Combining anthropological and legal analysis, Salyer demonstrates the economic, historical, political, and social elements that go into constructing inequity under law for millions of non-citizens who live and work in the United States. Drawing on both ethnographic research conducted in New York City and on the author's knowledge and experience as a practicing immigration lawyer at a non-profit organization, this book provides unique insight into the workings and effects of U.S. immigration law. Court of Injustice provides an up-close view of the experiences of immigration lawyers at non-profit organizations, in law school clinics, and in private practice to reveal limitations and possibilities available to non-citizens under U.S. immigration law. In this way, this book provides a new perspective on the study of migration by focusing specifically on the laws, courts, and people involved in U.S. immigration law.
Immigration courts --- Asylum courts --- Courts of special jurisdiction --- Biopolitics. --- Crimmigration. --- Deportation. --- Immigration Court. --- Immigration Law. --- Judicial Discretion. --- Lawyers. --- Legal Ethnography. --- Plenary Power Doctrine. --- State of Exception.
Choose an application
How the immigration courts became part of the nation's law enforcement agency-and how to reshape them. During the Trump administration, the immigration courts were decried as more politicized enforcement weapon than impartial tribunal. Yet few people are aware of a fundamental flaw in the system that has long pre-dated that administration: The immigration courts are not really "courts" at all but an office of the Department of Justice-the nation's law enforcement agency. This original and surprising diagnosis shows how paranoia sparked by World War II and the War on Terror drove the structure of the immigration courts. Focusing on previously unstudied decisions in the Roosevelt and Bush administrations, the narrative laid out in this book divulges both the human tragedy of our current immigration court system and the human crises that led to its creation. Moving the reader from understanding to action, Alison Peck offers a lens through which to evaluate contemporary bills and proposals to reform our immigration court system. Peck provides an accessible legal analysis of recent events to make the case for independent immigration courts, proposing that the courts be moved into an independent, Article I court system. As long as the immigration courts remain under the authority of the attorney general, the administration of immigration justice will remain a game of political football-with people's very lives on the line.
Emigration and immigration --- Emigration and immigration law --- Immigration courts --- Political aspects. --- History. --- America. --- Department of Justice. --- FBI. --- Great Depression. --- Nazi propaganda. --- Trump administration. --- WWII. --- asylum. --- attorney general. --- case proceedings. --- executive branch. --- fatal consequences. --- fear. --- fifth column. --- history. --- human tragedy. --- immigration courts. --- independent system. --- injustice. --- law enforcement agency. --- laws. --- legal analysis. --- neutral. --- political. --- power. --- spies. --- war on terror. --- war.
Choose an application
The impact of the U.S. immigration and legal systems on children and youth. In the United States, millions of children are undocumented migrants or have family members who came to the country without authorization. The unique challenges with which these children and youth must cope demand special attention. Illegal Encounters considers illegality, deportability, and deportation in the lives of young people--those who migrate as well as those who are affected by the migration of others. A primary focus of the volume is to understand how children and youth encounter, move through, or are outside of a range of legal processes, including border enforcement, immigration detention, federal custody, courts, and state processes of categorization. Even if young people do not directly interact with state immigration systems--because they are U.S. citizens or have avoided detention--they are nonetheless deeply affected by the reach of the government in its many forms. Contributors privilege the voices and everyday experiences of immigrant children and youth themselves. By combining different perspectives from advocates, service providers, attorneys, researchers, and young immigrants, the volume presents rich accounts that can contribute to informed debates and policy reforms. Illegal Encounters sheds light on the unique ways in which policies, laws, and legal categories shape so much of daily life for young immigrants. The book makes visible the burdens, hopes, and potential of a population of young people and their families who have been largely hidden from public view and are currently under siege, following their movement through complicated immigration systems and institutions in the United States.--Publisher website.
Noncitizen children --- Juvenile detention --- Deportation --- Mexicans --- Central Americans --- Illegal immigration. --- Government policy --- Social conditions. --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- Advance Parole. --- Central America. --- DACA. --- Dreamers. --- Guatemala. --- Mexico. --- US Department of Justice. --- US immigration courts. --- US immigration law. --- US immigration legislation. --- US-Mexico border. --- activism. --- child arrivals. --- child welfare. --- childhood. --- children’s rights. --- citizenship. --- civil society. --- criminal aliens. --- deportability. --- deportation orders. --- deterrence. --- digital media. --- domestic violence. --- due process. --- educational opportunities. --- enforcement. --- human rights. --- illegality. --- immigration courts. --- immigration judge. --- immigration law. --- immigration. --- intersectional approach. --- kinship. --- legal relief. --- legal representation. --- legal status. --- legal systems. --- migrant children. --- migrant youth. --- migration. --- mixed-status families. --- national belonging. --- political subjects. --- repatriation. --- smugglers. --- transnational families. --- unaccompanied minors. --- underclass. --- undocumented immigrant. --- undocumented immigrants. --- youth advocacy.
Choose an application
"I worked in a trailer that ICE had set aside for conversations between the women and the attorneys. While we talked, their children, most of whom seemed to be between three and eight years old, played with a few toys on the floor. It was hard for me to get my head around the idea of a jail full of toddlers, but there they were.” For decades, advocates for refugee children and families have fought to end the U.S. government’s practice of jailing children and families for months, or even years, until overburdened immigration courts could rule on their claims for asylum. Baby Jails is the history of that legal and political struggle. Philip G. Schrag, the director of Georgetown University’s asylum law clinic, takes readers through thirty years of conflict over which refugee advocates resisted the detention of migrant children. The saga began during the Reagan administration when 15-year-old Jenny Lisette Flores languished in a Los Angeles motel that the government had turned into a makeshift jail by draining the swimming pool, barring the windows, and surrounding the building with barbed wire. What became known as the Flores Settlement Agreement was still at issue years later, when the Trump administration resorted to the forced separation of families after the courts would not allow long-term jailing of the children. Schrag provides recommendations for the reform of a system that has brought anguish and trauma to thousands of parents and children. Provocative and timely, Baby Jails exposes the ongoing struggle between the U.S. government and immigrant advocates over the duration and conditions of confinement of children who seek safety in America.
Refugee children --- Immigrant children --- Asylum, Right of --- Detention of persons --- Immigrants --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- Government policy --- america. --- anguish and trauma. --- asylum law clinic. --- claims for asylum. --- confinement of children. --- detention of migrant children. --- flores settlement agreement. --- forced separation of families. --- georgetown university. --- immigrant advocates. --- jailing children. --- jailing families. --- legal struggle. --- los angeles. --- overburdened immigration courts. --- parents and children. --- political struggle. --- reagan administration. --- refugee advocates. --- refugee children. --- refugee families. --- system reform. --- thirty years of conflict. --- trump administration. --- us government.
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|