Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

More than the citizens of most countries, Americans are either religious or in jail--or both. But what does it mean when imprisonment and evangelization actually go hand in hand, or at least appear to? What do "faith-based" prison programs mean for the constitutional separation of church and state, particularly when prisoners who participate get special privileges? In Prison Religion, law and religion scholar Winnifred Fallers Sullivan takes up these and other important questions through a close examination of a 2005 lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a faith-based residential rehabilitation program in an Iowa state prison. Americans United for the Separation of Church and State v. Prison Fellowship Ministries, a trial in which Sullivan served as an expert witness, centered on the constitutionality of allowing religious organizations to operate programs in state-run facilities. Using the trial as a case study, Sullivan argues that separation of church and state is no longer possible. Religious authority has shifted from institutions to individuals, making it difficult to define religion, let alone disentangle it from the state. Prison Religion casts new light on church-state law, the debate over government-funded faith-based programs, and the predicament of prisoners who have precious little choice about what kind of rehabilitation they receive, if they are offered any at all.

Criminals --- Church and state --- Religious work with prisoners --- Crime and criminals --- Delinquents --- Offenders --- Persons --- Crime --- Criminal justice, Administration of --- Criminology --- Prisoners --- Rehabilitation --- Law and legislation --- Prison Fellowship --- InnerChange Freedom Initiative --- Americans United for Separation of Church and State --- Prison Fellowship Ministries (Organization) --- PFM --- IFI --- AU (Organization) --- A.U. (Organization) --- Americans United (Organization) --- AUSCS (Organization) --- A.U.S.C.S. (Organization) --- Protestants and Other Americans United for Separation of Church and State --- Trials, litigation, etc. --- Iowa --- IA --- State of Iowa --- Ayova --- Штат Аёва --- Shtat Ai︠o︡va --- Аёва --- Ai︠o︡va --- Айова --- Áawah Hahoodzo --- Iowa osariik --- Αϊόβα --- Πολιτεία της Αϊóβα --- Politeia tēs Aiova --- Estado de Iowa --- Iovao --- Oi-hò-fà --- 아이오와 주 --- Aiowa-ju --- 아이오와 --- Aiowa --- Áyowạ --- Iova --- Aioua --- Айовæ --- Aĭovæ --- Ajova --- Ајова --- アイオワ州 --- Aiowa-shū --- Aiowashū --- アイオワ --- Estado ng Ayowa --- Iowa Eyaleti --- Штат Айова --- Iowa Territory --- Territory of Iowa

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Many today place great hope in law as a vehicle for the transformation of society and accept that law is autonomous, universal, and above all, secular. Yet recent scholarship has called into question the simplistic narrative of a separation between law and religion and blurred the boundaries between these two categories, enabling new accounts of their relation that do not necessarily either collapse them together or return law to a religious foundation. This work gives special attention to the secularism of law, exploring how law became secular, the phenomenology of the legal secular, and the challenges that lingering religious formations and other aspects of globalization pose for modern law's self-understanding. Bringing together scholars with a variety of perspectives and orientations, it provides a deeper understanding of the interconnections between law and religion and the unexpected histories and anthropologies of legal secularism in a globalizing modernity.

Religion and law. --- Secularism.