Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book explores what specialists are saying about system leadership for school improvement. Case studies examine innovative approaches to sharing leadership across schools in Belgium (Flanders), Finland and the United Kingdom (England) and leadership development programmes for system improvement in Australia and Austria. As these are emerging practices, the book provides a first international comparison and assessment of the state of the art of system leadership.

Educational change -- United States. --- Educational leadership -- United States. --- School management and organization -- United States. --- School principals -- United States. --- Education --- Social Sciences --- Theory & Practice of Education --- Educational leadership. --- School management and organization. --- Educational administration --- Inspection of schools --- School administration --- School inspection --- School operation policies --- School organization --- Schools --- College leadership --- Education leadership --- School leadership --- Inspection --- Management and organization --- Educational planning --- Management --- Leadership --- Administration, Educational --- Operation policies, School --- Policies, School operation --- Organization

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In 2009, the Mexican state of Colima implemented a low-stakes accountability intervention with diagnostic feedback among 108 public primary schools with the lowest test scores in the national student assessment. A difference-in-difference and a regression discontinuity design are used to identify the effects of the intervention on learning outcomes. The two alternative strategies consistently show that the intervention increased test scores by 0.12 standard deviations only a few months after the program was launched. When students, teachers, and parents in a school know that their scores are low, and this triggers a process of self-evaluation and analysis, the process itself may lead to an improvement in learning outcomes. Information on quality, without punitive measures but within a supportive and collaborative environment, appears to be sufficient to improve learning outcomes.

Academic areas --- Academic year --- Achievement --- Age-grade distortion --- Average number of students --- Average score --- Average test scores --- Classroom --- Classrooms --- College --- Community schools --- Curriculum --- Decentralization --- Diplomas --- Economics of education --- Education --- Education authorities --- Education for all --- Education of teachers --- Education policies --- Education programs --- Education services --- Education system --- Educational authorities --- Educational programs --- Effective schools & teachers --- Exam --- Future research --- Girls --- Goals --- Grade retention --- Grade schools --- Graduate --- Graduate diploma --- Groups --- Innovative education --- Interventions --- ITS --- Knowledge --- Learning --- Learning outcomes --- Let --- Literacy --- Math scores --- Math test --- Ministry of education --- Mobility --- National educational programs --- National school --- Number of schools --- Number of students --- Number of teachers --- Online access --- Open access --- Papers --- Pedagogical tools --- Performance in math --- Performance of schools --- Primary education --- Primary schools --- Principals --- Public primary schools --- Public school --- Public school teachers --- Public schools --- Quality education --- Quality of education --- Quality of education services --- Report cards --- Research --- School --- School census --- School directors --- School improvement --- School improvement plan --- School improvement program --- School leaders --- School level --- School performance --- School principals --- School quality --- School size --- School supervision --- School supervisors --- School system --- School teachers --- School year --- Schooling --- Schools --- Science --- Secondary education --- Skills --- Standardized tests --- State education --- Statistics --- Strategies --- Student --- Student achievement --- Student assessment --- Student learning --- Student learning outcomes --- Student mobility --- Student outcomes --- Student performance --- Student population --- Student-Teacher ratio --- Student/teacher ratio --- Students --- Studies --- Study --- Subject areas --- Subjects --- Teacher --- Teacher ratio --- Teacher unions --- Teachers --- Teaching --- Tertiary education --- Test scores --- Tests --- Training --- Tuition --- University --- University degree

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This paper develops and estimates an equilibrium model of charter school entry and school choice. In the model, households choose among public, private, and charter schools, and a regulator authorizes charter entry and mandates charter exit. The model is estimated for Washington, D.C. According to the estimates, charters generate net social gains by providing additional school options, and they benefit non-white, low-income, and middle-school students the most. Further, policies that raise the supply of prospective charter entrants in combination with high authorization standards enhance social welfare.

Academic achievement --- Academic performance --- Academic programs --- Academic viability --- Academic year --- Achievement data --- Alternative schools --- Average class size --- Average number of children --- Black students --- Board of education --- Catholic schools --- Class size --- Classroom --- College --- Comprehensive assessment --- Cultural policy --- Culture & development --- Curricula --- Curriculum --- Early childhood --- Economics of education --- Educated parents --- Education --- Education for all --- Education reform --- Education statistics --- Education students --- Educational attainment --- Educational costs --- Effective schools --- Elementary school --- Elementary schools --- Enrollment by grade --- Enrollment data --- Ethnic composition --- Faculty --- Faculty development --- Fees --- Formula funding --- Geographic distribution --- Graduation rate --- Graduation rates --- High school --- High schools --- Knowledge --- Language curriculum --- Learning --- Literature --- Low enrollments --- Low-income students --- Middle school --- Middle school students --- Middle schools --- Ministry of education --- Net social gain --- Number of schools --- Number of students --- Open access --- Papers --- Parental income --- Partnerships in education --- Primary education --- Private school --- Private schools --- Public school --- Public school system --- Public schools --- Pupil funding --- Quality schools --- Racial segregation --- Reading --- Regular schools --- Research --- Research report --- Researchers --- School --- School attendance --- School buildings --- School climate --- School cost --- School costs --- School data --- School day --- School district --- School effectiveness --- School enrollment --- School enrolment --- School entry --- School experience --- School funding --- School leaders --- School level --- School levels --- School location --- School performance --- School principals --- School quality --- School reform --- School students --- School supply --- School survey --- School system --- School tuition --- School year --- School-age --- School-age children --- School-age population --- School-year --- Schooling --- Schools --- Science --- Secondary education --- Social science --- Social welfare --- Special education --- Student --- Student achievement --- Student body --- Student choice --- Student costs --- Student demand --- Student group --- Student groups --- Student population --- Students --- Teacher --- Teachers --- Teaching --- Teaching methods --- Tertiary education --- Tuition --- University --- Urban school --- Urban schools --- Values --- Vocational schools