Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
October 1998 Many governments have faced serious fiscal instabilities as a result of their growing contingent liabilities. But conventional fiscal analysis and institutions fall short in addressing contingent fiscal risks. What approaches in fiscal analysis and standards for public sector management would foster sound fiscal performance? And how can policymakers be made accountable for recognizing the long-term costs of both direct and contingent forms of government activity in their decisions? Governments are increasingly exposed to fiscal risks and uncertainties for three main reasons: ° The increasing volume and volatility of international flows of private capital. ° The state's transformation from financing services to guaranteeing that the private sector will achieve particular outcomes. ° Moral hazards arising in markets because the government is perceived to have residual responsibility for market outcomes. Sources of fiscal risk may be direct or contingent (a liability only if a particular event occurs). Whether direct or contingent, they are either explicit (recognized as a government liability by law or by contract) or implicit (a moral obligation reflecting public expectations and pressure from interest groups). The recent Asian crisis revealed that major moral hazards exist in markets and that sizable hidden fiscal risks may arise from contingent forms of government support. Governments must understand and know how to handle contingent liabilities if they are to avoid the danger of sudden fiscal instability and realize their long-term policy objectives. They can reduce fiscal risks by incorporating contingent liabilities into their analytical, policy, and institutional public finance frameworks. Governments can address fiscal risk through three channels in particular, says Polackova: ° By including contingent and implicit financial risks in their fiscal analysis and (to deter moral hazard in the market) by publicly acknowledging the limits of state responsibilities. ° By reflecting the cost of contingent liabilities in policy choices, budgeting, financial planning, reporting, and auditing. ° By developing institutional capacity to evaluate, regulate, control, and prevent financial risk in both the public and private sectors. Given the increasingly serious implications of contingent government liabilities for the fiscal outlook of countries, Polackova argues that it is time for the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and others to: ° Incorporate government contingent fiscal risks in their analysis of a country's fiscal sustainability, policies, and institutions. ° Require countries to disclose information regarding their exposure to contingent fiscal risks. ° Help countries embrace contingent liabilities in their analytical, policy, and institutional public finance frameworks. This paper-a product of the Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Sector Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region-is part of a larger effort in the region to enhance the Bank's analytical and operational work in public finance. The author may be contacted at hpolackova@worldbank.org.
Choose an application
Governments' contingent liabilities increase fiscal vulnerability, but are omitted in traditional measures of the current deficit. In the Czech Republic this omission may mean that fiscal adjustment has been overstated by 3 to 4 percent of annual GDP, with future budgets having to pay for past guarantees. The stock of existing contingent liabilities in Macedonia could add 2 to 4 percent of GDP to that country's future deficits.
Budget deficits --- Contingent liabilities (Accounting) --- Finance, Public --- Fiscal policy
Choose an application
Contingent liabilities have gained prominence in the analysis of public finance. Indeed, history is full of episodes in which the financial position of the public sector is substantially altered-or its true nature uncovered-as a result of government bailouts of financial or nonfinancial entities, in both the private and the public sector. The paper discusses theoretical and practical issues raised by contingent liabilities, including the rationale for taking them on, how to safeguard against the fiscal risks associated with them, how to account and budget for them, and how to disclose them. Country experiences are used to illustrate ways these issues are addressed in practice and challenges faced. The paper also points to good practices related to the mitigation, management and disclosure of risks from contingent liabilities.
Contingent liabilities (Accounting) --- Liabilities (Accounting) --- Finance, Public --- Risk management. --- Accounting. --- Government accounting --- Governmental accounting --- Public accounting --- Accrued liabilities --- Insurance --- Management --- Accounting --- Budgeting --- Public Finance --- Public Administration --- Public Sector Accounting and Audits --- National Budget --- Budget Systems --- Insurance Companies --- Actuarial Studies --- Public finance & taxation --- Budgeting & financial management --- Financial reporting, financial statements --- Insurance & actuarial studies --- Contingent liabilities --- Budget planning and preparation --- Financial statements --- Fiscal risks --- Fiscal policy --- Budget --- United States
Choose an application
In this paper, we develop a methodology to assess potential losses to the government that could arise from bank failures. The approach is intended to be simple, parsimonious, and used in real time. It generates an index that we call the banking sector contingent liability index (BCLI), based on the banking sector’s size, concentration, diversification, leverage, and riskiness of assets. The index is illustrated for 32 advanced and emerging market economies from 2006 to 2013, as well as a group of banks including global systemically important banks (G-SIBs).
Banks and banking --- Contingent liabilities (Accounting) --- Bank failures --- Failure of banks --- Business failures --- Liabilities (Accounting) --- Agricultural banks --- Banking --- Banking industry --- Commercial banks --- Depository institutions --- Finance --- Financial institutions --- Money --- Econometric models. --- Banks and Banking --- Financial Risk Management --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Contingent Pricing --- Futures Pricing --- option pricing --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Corporate Finance and Governance: Government Policy and Regulation --- Public Administration --- Public Sector Accounting and Audits --- Financial Crises --- Public finance & taxation --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Contingent liabilities --- Global financial crisis of 2008-2009 --- Financial crises --- Public financial management (PFM) --- Banking crises --- Fiscal policy --- Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009 --- Australia --- Option pricing
Choose an application
Deferred tax --- Business enterprises --- Business finance --- Business financial management --- Financial analysis of business enterprises --- Financial management, Business --- Financial management of business enterprises --- Financial planning of business enterprises --- Managerial finance --- Deferral of taxation --- Deferred income tax --- Tax, Deferred --- Tax debits --- Tax deferral --- Liabilities (Accounting) --- Tax accounting --- Tax shelters --- Accounting --- Finance --- E-books --- Taxation --- Economic aspects. --- Duties --- Fee system (Taxation) --- Tax policy --- Tax reform --- Taxation, Incidence of --- Taxes --- Finance, Public --- Revenue
Choose an application
This paper analyzes how different types of bank funding affect the extent to which banks ration credit to borrowers, and the impact that capital requirements have on that rationing. Using an extension of the standard Stiglitz-Weiss model of credit rationing, unsecured wholesale finance is shown to amplify the credit market impact of capital requirements as compared to funding by retail depositors. Unsecured finance surged in the pre-crisis years, but is increasingly replaced by secured funding. The collateralization of wholesale funding is found to expand the extent of credit rationing.
Bank assets --- Bank liabilities --- Bank profits --- Security (Law) --- Collateral security --- Secured transactions --- Commercial law --- Debtor and creditor --- Bank earnings --- Profit --- Liabilities (Accounting) --- Assets (Accounting) --- Econometric models. --- Econometric models --- E-books --- Banks and Banking --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Industries: Financial Services --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- Banking --- Monetary economics --- Finance --- Loans --- Bank credit --- Credit --- Bank deposits --- Banks and banking
Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|