Narrow your search

Library

National Bank of Belgium (2)

KU Leuven (1)


Resource type

book (2)


Language

English (2)


Year
From To Submit

2018 (1)

2011 (1)

Listing 1 - 2 of 2
Sort by

Book
Do Management Interventions Last? : Evidence from India
Authors: --- --- ---
Year: 2018 Publisher: Washington, D.C. : The World Bank,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Beginning in 2008, the authors conducted a randomized controlled trial that changed management practices in a set of Indian weaving firms (Bloom and others 2013). In 2017 the plants were revisited and the authors found three main results. First, while about half of the management practices adopted in the original experimental plants had been dropped, there was still a large and significant gap in practices between the treatment and control plants. Likewise, there remained a significant performance gap between treatment and control plants, suggesting lasting impacts of effective management interventions. Second, while few management practices had demonstrably spread across the firms in the study, many had spread within firms, from the experimental plants to the non-experimental plants, suggesting limited spillovers between firms but large spillovers within firms. Third, managerial turnover and the lack of director time were two of the most cited reasons for the drop in management practices in experimental plants, highlighting the importance of key employees.


Book
Does management matter? : evidence from India /
Authors: --- --- --- --- --- et al.
Year: 2011 Publisher: Cambridge, MA : National Bureau of Economic Research,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

"A long-standing question in social science is to what extent differences in management cause differences in firm performance. To investigate this we ran a management field experiment on large Indian textile firms. We provided free consulting on modern management practices to a randomly chosen set of treatment plants and compared their performance to the control plants. We find that adopting these management practices had three main effects. First, it raised average productivity by 11% through improved quality and efficiency and reduced inventory. Second, it increased decentralization of decision making, as better information flow enabled owners to delegate more decisions to middle managers. Third, it increased the use of computers, necessitated by the data collection and analysis involved in modern management. Since these practices were profitable this raises the question of why firms had not adopted these before. Our results suggest that informational barriers were a primary factor in explaining this lack of adoption. Modern management is a technology that diffuses slowly between firms, with many Indian firms initially unaware of its existence or impact. Since competition was limited by constraints on firm entry and growth, badly managed firms were not rapidly driven from the market"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.

Keywords

Listing 1 - 2 of 2
Sort by