Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Economic policy and planning (general) --- Economic sociology --- Policy sciences --- #SBIB:011.IO --- #SBIB:35H400 --- #SBIB:35H435 --- Policy-making --- Policymaking --- Public policy management --- Beleid: algemeen --- Beleidssectoren: economisch en werkgelegenheidsbeleid --- Public policy managementBeleid: algemeen

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Public policy managementEuropese Gemeenschappen--EC --- -#A9404A --- Policy sciences --- Political planning --- 341.17 EC --- #A9404A --- Policy-making --- Policymaking --- Public policy management --- Planning in politics --- Public policy --- Planning --- Politics, Practical --- Public administration --- 341.17 EC Europese Gemeenschappen--EC --- Europese Gemeenschappen--EC --- Policy sciences. --- Communauté européenne --- Monnaie unique européenne --- Décision politique --- Politique publique --- Institutions européennes --- Pays de l'Union européenne --- Influence --- Politique et gouvernement --- 1990-....

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Research institutes --- Pressure groups --- Centres de recherche --- Groupes de pression --- Geopolitics. --- Political planning --- Policy sciences --- Political aspects --- Policy sciencesPolitical aspects --- BPB0607 --- AA / International- internationaal --- FR / France - Frankrijk --- US / United States of America - USA - Verenigde Staten - Etats Unis --- 323.5 --- Pressiegroepen. Lobbying. --- Geopolitics --- Institutes, Research --- Research centers --- Think tanks --- Universities and colleges --- Learned institutions and societies --- Planning in politics --- Public policy --- Planning --- Politics, Practical --- Public administration --- Policy-making --- Policymaking --- Public policy management --- World politics --- Pressiegroepen. Lobbying --- Science politique --- Conseillers du gouvernement --- Expertises --- Clubs de réflexion --- Conseillers politiques --- Recherche --- Aspect politique

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In the post-September 11 world, Al Qaeda is no longer the central organizing force that aids or authorizes terrorist attacks or recruits terrorists. It is now more a source of inspiration for terrorist acts carried out by independent local groups that have branded themselves with the Al Qaeda name. Building on his previous groundbreaking work on the Al Qaeda network, forensic psychiatrist Marc Sageman has greatly expanded his research to explain how Islamic terrorism emerges and operates in the twenty-first century.In Leaderless Jihad, Sageman rejects the views that place responsibility for terrorism on society or a flawed, predisposed individual. Instead, he argues, the individual, outside influence, and group dynamics come together in a four-step process through which Muslim youth become radicalized. First, traumatic events either experienced personally or learned about indirectly spark moral outrage. Individuals interpret this outrage through a specific ideology, more felt and understood than based on doctrine. Usually in a chat room or other Internet-based venues, adherents share this moral outrage, which resonates with the personal experiences of others. The outrage is acted on by a group, either online or offline.Leaderless Jihad offers a ray of hope. Drawing on historical analogies, Sageman argues that the zeal of jihadism is self-terminating; eventually its followers will turn away from violence as a means of expressing their discontent. The book concludes with Sageman's recommendations for the application of his research to counterterrorism law enforcement efforts.

Terrorists --- Terrorism. --- Jihad. --- Terroristes --- Terrorisme --- Jihad --- Social networks. --- Réseaux sociaux --- Terrorism --- Social networks --- TerroristsSocial networks. --- Jihād --- Réseaux sociaux --- Criminals --- Acts of terrorism --- Attacks, Terrorist --- Global terrorism --- International terrorism --- Political terrorism --- Terror attacks --- Terrorist acts --- Terrorist attacks --- World terrorism --- Direct action --- Insurgency --- Political crimes and offenses --- Subversive activities --- Political violence --- Terror --- Holy war (Islam) --- Islamic holy war --- Jahad --- Jehad --- Muslim holy war --- War (Islamic law) --- Terrorists - Social networks --- African Studies. --- Asian Studies. --- Middle Eastern Studies. --- Political Science. --- Public Policy.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"Modern warfare is almost always multilateral to one degree or another, requiring countries to cooperate as allies or coalition partners. Yet as the war in Afghanistan has made abundantly clear, multilateral cooperation is neither straightforward nor guaranteed. Countries differ significantly in what they are willing to do and how and where they are willing to do it. Some refuse to participate in dangerous or offensive missions. Others change tactical objectives with each new commander. Some countries defer to their commanders while others hold them to strict account. NATO in Afghanistan explores how government structures and party politics in NATO countries shape how battles are waged in the field. Drawing on more than 250 interviews with senior officials from around the world, David Auerswald and Stephen Saideman find that domestic constraints in presidential and single-party parliamentary systems--in countries such as the United States and Britain respectively--differ from those in countries with coalition governments, such as Germany and the Netherlands. As a result, different countries craft different guidelines for their forces overseas, most notably in the form of military caveats, the often-controversial limits placed on deployed troops. Providing critical insights into the realities of alliance and coalition warfare, NATO in Afghanistan also looks at non-NATO partners such as Australia, and assesses NATO's performance in the 2011 Libyan campaign to show how these domestic political dynamics are by no means unique to Afghanistan."--Publishers.

#SBIB:327.5H21 --- #SBIB:327.6H01 --- #SBIB:327.7H32 --- Vrede – oorlog, oorlogssituaties --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: specifieke conflicten --- Bondgenootschappen: NAVO / NATO --- Afghanistan --- History, Military --- #SBIB:327.7H32Vrede – oorlog, oorlogssituaties --- Bondgenootschappen: NAVO / NATOAfghanistanHistory, Military --- Afghan war, 2001. --- International Security Assistance Force (Afghanistan). --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization -- Afghanistan. --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization -- History. --- Afghan War, 2001 --- -International Security Assistance Force (Afghanistan) --- Regions & Countries - Asia & the Middle East --- History & Archaeology --- South Asia --- Operation Enduring Freedom, 2001 --- -War on Terrorism, 2001-2009 --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- North Atlantic treaty organisation --- NAVO --- OTAN --- NATO --- HISTORY / Military / General. --- POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / General. --- POLITICAL SCIENCE / International Relations / Diplomacy. --- International Security Assistance Force (Afghanistan) --- -North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- -Operation Enduring Freedom, 2001 --- ISAF --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization. --- Kumak aw Hamkārī (Afghanistan) --- -Afghan War, 2001 --- Afghanistan. --- Australia. --- British-style politics. --- Canada. --- Denmark. --- Dutch government. --- France. --- Germany. --- Great Britain. --- International Security Assistance Force. --- Jacques Chirac. --- Libya. --- NATO countries. --- NATO effort. --- NATO institutions. --- NATO intervention. --- NATO interventions. --- NATO membership. --- NATO. --- Netherlands. --- New Zealand. --- Nicolas Sarkozy. --- Operation Enduring Freedom. --- Poland. --- United States. --- agent selection incentives. --- alliance actions. --- alliance warfare. --- caveats. --- civilЭilitary relations. --- coalition governments. --- coalition warfare. --- coalitions. --- decision makers. --- decision making. --- decision units. --- defense spending. --- domestic consequences. --- domestic political institutions. --- domestic politics. --- forum shopping. --- incentives. --- intrusive oversight. --- military behavior. --- military decisions. --- military interventions. --- minority government. --- multilateral contingents. --- multilateral efforts. --- multilateral forum shopping. --- multilateral military effort. --- multilateral military operations. --- multilateralism. --- national commands. --- officer selection. --- parliamentary coalition behavior. --- parliamentary government. --- parliamentary governments. --- political coalition. --- political cultures. --- political ideology. --- prime ministers. --- principal-agency theory. --- principal-agent relations. --- red cards. --- restrictions. --- unilateralism. --- Afghan War, 2001-2021