Listing 1 - 10 of 18 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Government immunity --- Government responsibility --- Liability, Government --- Liability, Public --- Liability of the state --- Public liability --- Sovereign immunity --- State liability --- State responsibility --- Tort liability of the government --- Tort liability of the state --- Constitutional law --- Government liability --- Administrative law --- Administrative responsibility --- Liability (Law) --- Misconduct in office --- Public law --- Torts --- Act of state --- Constitutional torts --- State action (Civil rights) --- Law and legislation --- constitutional law --- fundamental rights --- democracy
Choose an application
Das Handbuch bietet erstmals eine systematische Darstellung der Staatshaftungssysteme in den EU-Mitgliedstaaten sowie in der Schweiz und der Türkei. Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede in den verschiedenen Rechtsordnungen der europäischen Staaten werden aufgezeigt, in den Kontext des Unionsrechts gestellt und Ansätze für ein künftig einheitliches Staatshaftungsrecht skizziert. Das Werk enthält zum einen mehr als zwanzig Berichte über die Staatshaftungsregimes in den Einzelstaaten; zum anderen erläutert ein übergreifender Sachbericht den gesamteuropäischen Kontext und zieht vergleichende Schlussfolgerungen zu den einzelnen Sachthemen. Aus der Zusammenschau der nationalen Staatshaftungssysteme mit dem Stand der richterrechtlich entwickelten Unionshaftung wird das Staatshaftungsrecht in der EU umfassend analysiert sowie seine Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten auf der Grundlage allgemeiner Rechtsgrundsätze bestimmt. This reference work provides a systematic presentation of the liability systems in EU member states for the first time. Similarities and differences between EU states' various legal systems are presented and also explained in terms of Union Law. In addition, approaches to establishing a uniform state liability law in the future are outlined. This work includes, on the one hand, more than twenty reports about the state liability systems in the individual member states; on the other hand, comprehensive specialized report explain the entire European context and present comparative conclusions on the individual specialized topics. Based on the synopsis of the state liability systems together with the current state of Union liability as developed in case law, the law on state liability in the EU is extensively analyzed and its capability to develop based on general legal principles is defined.
Government liability --- Government immunity --- Government responsibility --- Liability, Government --- Liability, Public --- Liability of the state --- Public liability --- Sovereign immunity --- State liability --- State responsibility --- Tort liability of the government --- Tort liability of the state --- Administrative law --- Administrative responsibility --- Constitutional law --- Liability (Law) --- Misconduct in office --- Public law --- Torts --- Act of state --- Constitutional torts --- State action (Civil rights) --- Law and legislation --- Comparative Law. --- State Liability Law.
Choose an application
Engaging case studies on the impact of state sovereign immunity on both plaintiffs and states.
Federal government --- Government liability --- States' rights (American politics) --- Government immunity --- Government responsibility --- Liability, Government --- Liability, Public --- Liability of the state --- Public liability --- Sovereign immunity --- State liability --- State responsibility --- Tort liability of the government --- Tort liability of the state --- Administrative law --- Administrative responsibility --- Constitutional law --- Liability (Law) --- Misconduct in office --- Public law --- Torts --- Act of state --- Constitutional torts --- State action (Civil rights) --- State rights --- Sovereignty --- Exclusive and concurrent legislative powers --- Nullification (States' rights) --- States. --- Law and legislation
Choose an application
"Ideas of collective responsibility challenge the doctrine of individual responsibility that is the dominant paradigm in law and liberal political theory. But little attention is given to the consequences of holding groups accountable for wrongdoing. Groups are not amenable to punishment in the way that individuals are. Can they be punished - and if so, how - or are other remedies available? The topic crosses the borders of law, philosophy, and political science, and in this volume specialists in all three areas contribute their perspectives. They examine the limits of individual criminal liability in addressing atrocity, the meanings of punishment and responsibility, the distribution of group punishment to a group's members, and the means by which collective accountability can be expressed. In doing so, they reflect on the legacy of the Nuremberg Trials, on the philosophical understanding of collective responsibility, and on the place of collective accountability in international political relations"--
Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Crimes against humanity. --- Criminal liability (International law) --- Government liability. --- Criminal liability (International law). --- Crimes against humanity --- Government liability --- Crime --- International crimes --- Genocide --- War crimes --- Government immunity --- Government responsibility --- Liability, Government --- Liability, Public --- Liability of the state --- Public liability --- Sovereign immunity --- State liability --- State responsibility --- Tort liability of the government --- Tort liability of the state --- Administrative law --- Administrative responsibility --- Constitutional law --- Liability (Law) --- Misconduct in office --- Public law --- Torts --- Act of state --- Constitutional torts --- State action (Civil rights) --- International law --- Law and legislation --- Law --- General and Others --- Collective liability (International law)
Choose an application
Political sociology --- Political systems --- Government --- Public administration --- Latin America --- Rule of law --- Government liability --- Democratización --- Sociedad Civil --- Administración pública --- Government immunity --- Government responsibility --- Liability, Government --- Liability, Public --- Liability of the state --- Public liability --- Sovereign immunity --- State liability --- State responsibility --- Tort liability of the government --- Tort liability of the state --- Administrative law --- Administrative responsibility --- Constitutional law --- Liability (Law) --- Misconduct in office --- Public law --- Torts --- Act of state --- Constitutional torts --- State action (Civil rights) --- Supremacy of law --- Law and legislation --- América Latina --- Politics and government --- Política gubernamental
Choose an application
"Every State has an obligation to prevent terrorist attacks emanating from its territory. This proposition stems from various multilateral agreements and UN Security Council resolutions. This study exhaustively addresses the scope of this obligation of prevention and the legal consequences flowing from its violation, so as to provide greater clarity on governments' counterterrorism duties and to enhance State accountability for preventable wrongs. It defines the contents and contours of the obligation while placing critical emphasis on the mechanics of State responsibility. Whether obscured by new technologies like the Internet, the sophisticated cellular structure of some terrorist organisations or convoluted political realities, the level of governmental involvement in terrorist activities is no longer readily discernible in every instance. Furthermore, the prospect of governments waging surrogate warfare through proxies also poses intractable challenges to the mechanism of attribution in the context of State responsibility. This monograph sets out the shortcomings of the extant scheme of State responsibility while identifying a paradigm shift towards more indirect modes of accountability under international law, a trend corroborated by recent State and institutional practice. Drawing on varied legal and theoretical influences, the study devises and prescriptively argues for the implementation of a strict liability-inspired model grounded in the logic of indirect responsibility with a view to enhancing State compliance with counterterrorism obligations. This shifts the policy focus squarely to prevention, while promoting multilateralism and transnational cooperation. Ultimately, the legal and policy sensibilities underlying the book converge into a new theory of prevention in counterterrorism contexts."--Bloomsbury Publishing.
Terrorism --- Government liability. --- Government immunity --- Government liability --- Government responsibility --- Liability, Government --- Liability, Public --- Liability of the state --- Public liability --- Sovereign immunity --- State liability --- State responsibility --- Tort liability of the government --- Tort liability of the state --- Administrative law --- Administrative responsibility --- Constitutional law --- Liability (Law) --- Misconduct in office --- Public law --- Torts --- Act of state --- Constitutional torts --- State action (Civil rights) --- War on Terrorism, 2001-2009 --- Prevention --- Law and legislation. --- Law and legislation --- Acts of terrorism --- Attacks, Terrorist --- Global terrorism --- International terrorism --- Political terrorism --- Terror attacks --- Terrorist acts --- Terrorist attacks --- World terrorism --- Direct action --- Insurgency --- Political crimes and offenses --- Subversive activities --- Political violence --- Terror --- Prevention&delete& --- E-books --- Terrorism - Prevention - Law and legislation
Choose an application
This book examines what makes accountability for previous violations more or less possible for transitional regimes to achieve. It closely examines the other vital goals of such regimes against which accountability is often balanced. The options available are not simply prosecution or pardon, as the most heated polemics of the debate over transitional justice suggest, but a range of options from complete amnesty through truth commissions and lustration or purification to prosecutions. The question, then, is not whether or not accountability can be achieved, but what degree of accountability ca
Truth commissions --- Human rights --- Crimes against humanity --- War crimes --- Government liability --- Restorative justice --- Amnesty --- Criminal justice, Administration of --- Executive power --- Clemency --- Forgiveness --- Pardon --- Political rehabilitation --- Balanced and restorative justice --- BARJ (Restorative justice) --- Community justice --- Restorative community justice --- Reparation (Criminal justice) --- Government immunity --- Government responsibility --- Liability, Government --- Liability, Public --- Liability of the state --- Public liability --- Sovereign immunity --- State liability --- State responsibility --- Tort liability of the government --- Tort liability of the state --- Administrative law --- Administrative responsibility --- Constitutional law --- Liability (Law) --- Misconduct in office --- Public law --- Torts --- Act of state --- Constitutional torts --- State action (Civil rights) --- Crime --- International crimes --- Genocide --- Commissions, Truth --- Reconciliation commissions --- Governmental investigations --- Law and legislation
Choose an application
A multitude of conventions in the area of the Law of the Sea contains provisions on the issue of compensation for (wrongful) interferences with navigation. Even though interferences by warships and coast guard vessels, due to a perceived increased risk of international crimes at sea, seem to have become more frequent, the compensation provisions have hardly been applied. The book analyses all relevant compensation provisions and compares them to the general law of state responsibility. This necessarily includes a discussion of issues like the responsibility of international organizations, liability for lawful conduct and several and joint liability in public international law.
Freedom of the seas. --- Self-defense (International law) --- War, Maritime (International law) --- Government liability. --- Government immunity --- Government liability --- Government responsibility --- Liability, Government --- Liability, Public --- Liability of the state --- Public liability --- Sovereign immunity --- State liability --- State responsibility --- Tort liability of the government --- Tort liability of the state --- Administrative law --- Administrative responsibility --- Constitutional law --- Liability (Law) --- Misconduct in office --- Public law --- Torts --- Act of state --- Constitutional torts --- State action (Civil rights) --- Freedom of the seas --- Mare liberum --- Open seas (Law) --- Sea, Freedom of the --- Seas, Freedom of the --- Law of the sea --- Mare clausum --- Maritime war (International law) --- Naval warfare (International law) --- International law --- Neutrality --- Law and legislation --- Law. --- Law of the sea. --- International law. --- Law of the Sea, Air and Outer Space. --- High seas, Jurisdiction over --- Marine law --- Ocean --- Ocean law --- Sea, Law of the --- Maritime law --- Territorial waters --- Acts, Legislative --- Enactments, Legislative --- Laws (Statutes) --- Legislative acts --- Legislative enactments --- Jurisprudence --- Legislation --- Law of nations --- Nations, Law of --- Public international law --- Law
Choose an application
Narrowing the Nation's Power is the tale of how a cohesive majority of the Supreme Court has, in the last six years, cut back the power of Congress and enhanced the autonomy of the fifty states. The immunity from suit of the sovereign, Blackstone taught, is necessary to preserve the people's idea that the sovereign is "a superior being." Promoting the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity to constitutional status, the current Supreme Court has used it to shield the states from damages for age discrimination, disability discrimination, and the violation of patents, trademarks, copyrights, and fair labor standards. Not just the states themselves, but every state-sponsored entity--a state insurance scheme, a state university's research lab, the Idaho Potato Commission-has been insulated from paying damages in tort or contract. Sovereign immunity, as Noonan puts it, has metastasized. "It only hurts when you think about it," Noonan's Yalewoman remarks. Crippled by the states' immunity, Congress has been further brought to heel by the Supreme Court's recent invention of two rules. The first rule: Congress must establish a documentary record that a national evil exists before Congress can legislate to protect life, liberty, or property under the Fourteenth Amendment. The second rule: The response of Congress to the evil must then be both "congruent" and "proportionate." The Supreme Court determines whether these standards are met, thereby making itself the master monitor of national legislation. Even legislation under the Commerce Clause has been found wanting, illustrated here by the story of Christy Brzonkala's attempt to redress multiple rapes at a state university by invoking the Violence Against Women Act. The nation's power has been remarkably narrowed. Noonan is a passionate believer in the place of persons in the law. Rules, he claims, are a necessary framework, but they must not obscure law's task of giving justice to persons. His critique of Supreme Court doctrine is driven by this conviction.
Government liability --- State governments --- States. --- Privileges and immunities. --- United States. --- Government immunity --- Government responsibility --- Liability, Government --- Liability, Public --- Liability of the state --- Public liability --- Sovereign immunity --- State liability --- State responsibility --- Tort liability of the government --- Tort liability of the state --- Law and legislation --- Supreme Court (U.S.) --- Chief Justice of the United States --- Supreme Court of the United States --- 美國. --- Subnational governments --- Administrative law --- Administrative responsibility --- Constitutional law --- Liability (Law) --- Misconduct in office --- Public law --- Torts --- Act of state --- Constitutional torts --- State action (Civil rights) --- United States --- States --- Privileges and immunities --- United States. Supreme Court --- State governments - United States - Privileges and immunities. --- 14th amendment. --- america. --- commerce clause. --- common law. --- court majority. --- discussion books. --- federal court. --- legal framework. --- legal history. --- legal studies. --- modern law. --- national legislation. --- nations power. --- nonfiction. --- political science. --- power of the court. --- retrospective. --- sovereign immunity. --- state protection. --- states autonomy. --- states immunity. --- supreme court decisions. --- supreme court doctrine. --- supreme court. --- textbooks. --- united states. --- us congress. --- us constitution. --- us courts.
Choose an application
This book offers a unique comparison between state and individual responsibility for international crimes and examines the theories that can explain the relationship between these two regimes. The study provides a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the relevant international practice from the standpoint of both international criminal law, and in particular the case law of international criminal tribunals, and state responsibility. The author shows the various connections and issues arising from the parallel establishment of state and individual responsibility for the commission of the same international crimes. These connections indicate a growing need to better co-ordinate these regimes of international responsibility. The author maintains that a general conception, according to which state and individual responsibility are two separate sets of secondary rules attached to the breach of the same primary norms, can help to solve the various issues relating to this dual responsibility. This conception of the complementarity between state and individual responsibility justifies co-ordination and consistent application of these two different regimes, each of which aims to foster compliance with the most important obligations owed to the international community as a whole.
Criminal liability (International law) --- International crimes --- Government liability (International law) --- Administrative responsibility --- Superior orders (Criminal law) --- Complementarity (International law) --- Administrative responsibility. --- Government liability. --- International crimes. --- International offenses. --- Complementarity (International law). --- Criminal liability (International law). --- Government liability (International law). --- Superior orders (Criminal law). --- Criminal law --- Justification (Law) --- Personal liability of public employees --- Responsibility, Administrative --- Tort liability of public employees --- Administrative law --- Liability (Law) --- Government immunity --- Government liability --- Government responsibility --- Liability, Government --- Liability, Public --- Liability of the state --- Public liability --- Sovereign immunity --- State liability --- State responsibility --- Tort liability of the government --- Tort liability of the state --- Constitutional law --- Misconduct in office --- Public law --- Torts --- Act of state --- Constitutional torts --- State action (Civil rights) --- International law --- Crimes, International --- International crime --- International offenses --- Crime --- Law and legislation
Listing 1 - 10 of 18 | << page >> |
Sort by
|