Listing 1 - 10 of 22 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Belligerent Reprisals examines the historical developments in the law and practice relating to recourse to belligerent reprisals, as a (primitive) means of law enforcement in the hands of a party to an armed conflict, victim of a violation of the law of war at the hands of its enemy. As a legal concept, the notion means that the victim in turn violates a rule of the same body of the law of war, with the purpose of thus inducing the enemy to terminate its unlawful conduct. However, the enemy may in its turn denounce the so-called reprisal as an unlawful act of war and retaliate against it, thus setting in motion the ill-famed spiral of negative reciprocity. While early lawmakers refrained from taking up the issue, prohibitions of reprisals could be achieved in conventions adopted in 1929 and 1949 on the protection of the power of the enemy. In contrast, reprisals (or retaliatory conduct announced under that title without meeting the requisite conditions) were common practice in the conduct of hostilities, with civilians in non-occupied territory as the main victims. With major governments disinclined to give up this tool, the ban on reprisals against civilian populations ultimately accepted in the Protocols of 1977 Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 could only be hard-fought, and it remains contested to this day. First published in 1971, Belligerent Reprisals has become a classic work on this complex topic. The analysis of lawmaking and state practice it contains is as valid today as it was in the late 1970's, and elucidates the dilemmas inherent in the notion of belligerent reprisal, as a means of law enforcement that can go terribly wrong.
Reprisals. --- Belligerency. --- Belligerency --- Reprisals
Choose an application
eebo-0014
Privateering --- Reprisals --- Great Britain --- Politics and government
Choose an application
eebo-0018
Privateering --- Reprisals --- Great Britain --- Politics and government
Choose an application
eebo-0018
Reprisals --- Privateering --- Turner, Edmond, --- Carew, George
Choose an application
eebo-0018
Reprisals --- Elizabeth (Ship) --- Great Britain --- Colonies --- Commerce.
Choose an application
eebo-0113
Reprisals. --- Elizabeth (Ship) --- Great Britain --- Colonies --- Commerce.
Choose an application
Imaging systems --- Trade secrets --- Business intelligence. --- Reprisals.
Choose an application
eebo-0147
Reprisals. --- Privateering --- Carew, George, --- Turner, Edmond, --- Great Britain --- History
Choose an application
Reprisals --- Hawes, Nathaniel. --- Elizabeth (Ship) --- Virginia --- History --- History and chronicles
Choose an application
Wie ist es zu erklären, dass sich die bewaffneten Repressalien den Normierungsbemühungen seit dem 19. Jh. entzogen, während diese nicht-kriegerische Maßnahme ein sensibles Thema im Völkerrecht darstellte? Ausgehend vom mittelalterlichen Repressalienrecht und seiner schwindenden Geltung in der Neuzeit beweist die Untersuchung, dass die Großmächte diese Gewaltanwendung in Friedenszeiten zum Privileg machten und sie in einer völkerrechtlichen Grauzone beließen. Dies ermöglichte es, militärische Repressalienhandlungen gegen kleine Staaten durchzuführen, ohne die Folgen eines formellen Krieges zu tragen. Die Arbeit erläutert die zögerliche Haltung der Rechtslehre und zeigt, warum der Völkerbund in dem Versuch scheiterte, dieses Problem zu lösen.
Listing 1 - 10 of 22 | << page >> |
Sort by
|