Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
French literature --- Clézio, Le, Jean-Marie Gustave --- Michaux, Henri --- Michaux, Henri, --- Le Clezio, --- Criticism and interpretation --- Le Clezio, J.-M. G. --- -Michaux, Henri --- -Criticism and interpretation --- Le Clézio, J.-M. G. --- Le Clézio, Jean Marie Gustave, --- Clézio, J.-M. G. Le --- Criticism and interpretation. --- Michaux, Henry --- Le Clézio, Jean-Marie Gustave --- Le Clézio, J.-M. G. --- Michaux, H. --- Misho, Anri, --- Misho, Henri, --- Michaux, Henry, --- Michaux, Henri, - 1899-1984 - Criticism and interpretation --- Le Clézio, J.-M. G. - (Jean-Marie Gustave), - 1940- - Criticism and interpretation --- Michaux, Henri, - 1899-1984 --- Le Clézio, J.-M. G. - (Jean-Marie Gustave), - 1940 --- -French literature
Choose an application
In her Introduction, Tymieniecka states the core theme of the present book sharply: Is culture an excess of nature's prodigious expansiveness - an excess which might turn out to be dangerous for nature itself if it goes too far - or is culture a 'natural', congenial prolongation of nature-life? If the latter, then culture is assimilated into nature and thus would lose its claim to autonomy: its criteria would be superseded by those of nature alone. Of course, nature and culture may both still be seen as being absorbed by the inner powers of specifically human inwardness, on which view, human being, caught in its own transcendence, becomes separated radically in kind from the rest of existence and may not touch even the shadow of reality except through its own prism. Excess, therefore, or prolongation? And on what terms? The relationship between culture and nature in its technical phase demands a new elucidation. Here this is pursued by excavating the root significance of the 'multiple rationalities' of life. In contrast to Husserl, who differentiated living types according to their degree of participation in the world, the phenomenology of life disentangles living types from within the ontopoietic web of life itself. The human creative act reveals itself as the Great Divide of the Logos of Life - a divide that does not separate but harmonizes, thus dispelling both naturalistic and spiritualistic reductionism.
Life --- Phenomenology --- Phenomenology and literature --- Le Clézio, J.-M. G. --- Rio, Michel --- Criticism and interpretation --- Congresses. --- -Phenomenology --- -Phenomenology and literature --- -Literature --- Philosophy, Modern --- Congresses --- Philosophy --- Le Clezio, J.-M. G. --- -Rio, Michel --- -Criticism and interpretation --- -Congresses --- Literature --- Le Clézio, J.-M. G. --- Le Clézio, Jean Marie Gustave, --- Clézio, J.-M. G. Le --- Le Clézio, Jean-Marie Gustave --- Phenomenology . --- Philosophy and science. --- Philosophy of nature. --- Philosophy. --- Phenomenology. --- Philosophy of Science. --- Philosophy of Nature. --- Philosophy of Man. --- Mental philosophy --- Humanities --- Nature --- Nature, Philosophy of --- Natural theology --- Science and philosophy --- Science --- Life - Congresses. --- Phenomenology - Congresses. --- Phenomenology and literature - Congresses. --- Le Clézio, J.-M. G. - (Jean-Marie Gustave), - 1940- - Criticism and interpretation - Congresses. --- Rio, Michel - Criticism and interpretation - Congresses. --- Le Clézio, J.-M. G. - (Jean-Marie Gustave), - 1940
Choose an application
Forme à la fois immémoriale et moderne, condition d’ordre et ferment de panique, associée à la mémoire et au savoir comme à l’oubli et à la dépense, la liste est partout. On la remarque dans les écrits les plus banals, les plus prosaïques, aussi bien que dans un nombre illimité de productions littéraires. Aussi courante – sinon plus – que le discours narratif construit auquel elle s’oppose, elle est pourtant longtemps restée inaperçue, voire gênante, signe d’aridité ou de factualité terre-à-terre, tache aveugle des études littéraires. Son observation poussée révèle néanmoins une extraordinaire richesse d’expression. Qu’on l’appréhende sous son angle le plus formel ou qu’on la réinsère dans les contextes de son apparition, on constate qu’elle soulève de nombreux questionnements, d’ordre grammatical, typographique ou épistémologique, aussi bien qu’affectif, ludique ou thymique. Elle se présente enfin comme une forme à la pertinence historique considérable pour la compréhension de la littérature de la seconde moitié du XXe siècle, et au-delà. Le Clézio, Modiano et Perec en témoignent, arpenteurs d’un temps profondément inscrit dans un mouvement oscillatoire de pléthore et de manque. Une perspective qui signale la liste comme l’un des symptômes scripturaux les plus prégnants de notre époque.
Listes --- Énumération (rhétorique) --- Dans la littérature --- Le Clézio, Jean-Marie Gustave --- Modiano, Patrick --- Perec, Georges --- Critique et interprétation --- French literature --- Lists in literature --- History and criticism --- Le Clézio, J.-M. G. --- Modiano, Patrick, --- Perec, Georges, --- Criticism and interpretation --- Littérature française --- Histoire et critique --- Histoire et critique. --- Critique et interprétation. --- Dans la littérature. --- Le Clézio, J. M. G. --- French literature - 20th century - History and criticism --- Le Clézio, J.-M. G. - (Jean-Marie Gustave), - 1940- - Criticism and interpretation --- Modiano, Patrick, - 1945- - Criticism and interpretation --- Perec, Georges, - 1936-1982 - Criticism and interpretation --- Le Clézio, J.-M. G. - (Jean-Marie Gustave), - 1940 --- -Modiano, Patrick, - 1945 --- -Perec, Georges, - 1936-1982 --- 18.25 French literature. --- French literature. --- Listes dans la littérature. --- Lists in literature. --- Criticism and interpretation. --- 1900-1999.
Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|