Listing 1 - 10 of 52 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Guilt (Law) --- Law --- Philosophy
Choose an application
Damages --- Guilt (Law) --- Liability (Law)
Choose an application
Choose an application
Criminal liability --- Guilt (Law) --- Congresses --- Congresses
Choose an application
Guilt (Law) --- Criminal law --- Criminal liability --- Droit pénal
Choose an application
Guilt (Law) --- -Criminal law --- Criminal liability --- Psychological aspects --- Psychological aspects. --- -Psychological aspects --- Criminal law
Choose an application
This book argues that ignorance of law should usually be a complete excuse from criminal liability. It defends this conclusion by invoking two presumptions: first, the content of criminal law should conform to morality; second, mistakes of fact and mistakes of law should be treated symmetrically. The author grounds his position in an underlying theory of moral and criminal responsibility according to which blameworthiness consists in a defective response to the moral reasons one has.
Ignorance (Law) --- Philosophy. --- Criminal liability --- Good faith (Law) --- Guilt (Law) --- Mistake (Law)
Choose an application
We live in a morally flawed world. Our lives are complicated by what other people do, and by the harms that flow from our social, economic and political institutions. Our relations as individuals to these collective harms constitute the domain of complicity. This book examines the relationship between collective responsibility and individual guilt. It presents a rigorous philosophical account of the nature of our relations to the social groups in which we participate, and uses that account in a discussion of contemporary moral theory. Christopher Kutz shows that the two prevailing theories of moral philosophy, Kantianism and consequentialism, both have difficulties resolving problems of complicity. He then argues for a richer theory of accountability in which any real understanding of collective action not only allows but demands individual responsibility.
Collectivism. --- Guilt (Law) --- Law and ethics. --- Responsibility. --- Guilt (Law). --- Collectivism --- Law and ethics --- Responsibility --- Accountability --- Moral responsibility --- Obligation --- Ethics --- Supererogation --- Ethics and law --- Law and morals --- Morals and law --- Law --- Criminal law --- Criminal liability --- Totalitarianism --- Philosophy --- Arts and Humanities
Choose an application
'You can't be convicted of a crime without a guilty act and a guilty mind.' A lawyer might express the same idea using Latin: 'You can't be convicted of a crime without actus reus and mens rea.' 'Guilty Acts, Guilty Minds' proposes an interpretation of mens rea and actus reus as limits on the authority of a democratic state to ascribe guilt through positive law to those accused of crime.
Criminal intent --- Criminal justice, Administration of --- Philosophy. --- Dolus (Criminal law) --- Intent, Criminal --- Mens rea --- Guilt (Law) --- Law and legislation
Choose an application
Through a combined philosophical, historical, and socio-legal methodology, this volume investigates the changing nature of criminal responsibility in English law from the mid-18th Century to the early 21st Century, arguing that ideas of character responsibility are enjoying a renaissance in the modern criminal law.
Criminal liability --- Criminal intent --- Law - Great Britain --- Law - Non-U.S. --- Law, Politics & Government --- Dolus (Criminal law) --- Intent, Criminal --- Mens rea --- Guilt (Law) --- Law and legislation
Listing 1 - 10 of 52 | << page >> |
Sort by
|