Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Art --- Philosophy --- Congresses --- Art - Philosophy - Congresses --- Art - Philosophy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Hegel gave lecture series on aesthetics or the philosophy of art in various university terms, but never published a book of his own on this topic. His student, H. G. Hotho, compiled auditors' transcripts from these separate lecture series and produced from them the three volumes on aesthetics in the standard edition of Hegel's collected works. Annemarie Gethmann-Siefert has now published one of these transcripts, the Hotho transcript of the 1823 lecture series, and accompanied it with a very extensive introductory essay treating many issues pertinent to a proper understanding of Hegel's views on art. She persuasively argues that the evidence shows Hegel never finalized his views on the philosophy of art, but modified them in significant ways from one lecture series to the next. In addition, she makes the case that Hotho's compilation not only concealed this circumstance, by the harmony he created out of diverse source materials, but also imposed some of his own views on aesthetics, views that differ from Hegel's and that the ongoing interpretation of the aesthetics part of Hegel's philosophy has unfortunately taken to be Hegel's own. This translation of the German volume, which contains the first publication of the Hotho transcript and Gethmann-Siefert's essay, makes these important materials accessible to the English reader, materials that should put the English-speaking world's future understanding and interpretation of Hegel's philosophy of art on a sounder footing.

Aesthetics --- Art --- Philosophy --- Art - Philosophy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Art --- Aesthetics --- Philosophy --- Art - Philosophy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"L'œuvre d'art est une tentative vers l'unique, elle s'affirme comme un tout, un absolu et, en même temps, elle appartient à un système de relations complexes... Elle est matière et elle est esprit, elle est forme et elle est contenu... Elle est créatrice du monde et installe dans l'histoire un ordre qui ne se réduit à rien d'autre." Cet ouvrage est devenu un classique que tout étudiant en histoire de l'art se doit d'avoir lu. Il témoigne non seulement de la grande érudition de son auteur mais aussi de la perception et de la compréhension des œuvres d'art, formes construisant l'espace ; la matière et l'esprit d'un univers imaginaire dont "les artistes sont les géomètres".

Art - Philosophy --- Form (Philosophy) --- Form (Aesthetics) --- Art

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Was ist und was kann Kunst? Die zentralen Fragen der philosophischen Ästhetik sind nur anti-objektivistisch zu beantworten. Doch was das heißt, das zeigt sich erst in der Begegnung historisch-systematischen Denkens mit der Kunst. Andrea Sakoparnig plädiert dafür, im Ausgang von der Frage nach der Objektivität des Ästhetischen die beiden zentralen Fragen der philosophischen Ästhetik neu zu stellen. Dazu rekonstruiert und diskutiert sie den in der philosophischen Tradition formulierten Einwand vom objektivistischen Missverständnis, den sie auf seine Wurzeln hin reflektiert und mit drei paradigmatischen Kunstwerken der Avantgarde konfrontiert. Damit begibt sie sich auf den Weg zu einer neuen Ontologie des Kunstwerks, die den heterogenen Plural der Seins- und Erscheinungsweisen von Kunst zum Ausgang nimmt.

Aesthetics & Cultural Theory --- Aesthetics --- Art--Philosophy --- Objectivity