Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Ethical concepts are, or purport to be, normative. They make claims on us: they command, oblige, recommend, or guide. Or at least when we invoke them, we make claims on one another; but where does their authority over us - or ours over one another - come from? Christine Korsgaard identifies four accounts of the source of normativity that have been advocated by modern moral philosophers: voluntarism, realism, reflective endorsement, and the appeal to autonomy. She traces their history, showing how each developed in response to the prior one and comparing their early versions with those on the contemporary philosophical scene. Kant's theory that normativity springs from our own autonomy emerges as a synthesis of the other three, and Korsgaard concludes with her own version of the Kantian account. Her discussion is followed by commentary from G. A. Cohen, Raymond Geuss, Thomas Nagel, and Bernard Williams, and a reply by Korsgaard.

Normativity (Ethics) --- Normativity (Ethics). --- General ethics --- Norme (Morale) --- Ethical norms --- Normativeness (Ethics) --- Ethics --- Arts and Humanities --- Philosophy --- Norme (morale)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Ethics --- Ethiek --- Ethique --- Morale sociale --- Normes sociales --- Social ethics --- Social norms --- Sociale ethiek --- Sociale normen --- Normativity (Ethics) --- Norme sociale --- --Éthique --- --Ethics --- Folkways --- Norms, Social --- Rules, Social --- Social rules --- Manners and customs --- Social control --- Social problems --- Sociology --- Ethical norms --- Normativeness (Ethics) --- Deontology --- Ethics, Primitive --- Ethology --- Moral philosophy --- Morality --- Morals --- Philosophy, Moral --- Science, Moral --- Philosophy --- Values --- Ethics. --- Social ethics. --- Social norms. --- Normativity (Ethics). --- --Normativity (Ethics). --- --Social ethics --- Éthique

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Hegel’s Theory of Intelligibility picks up on recent revisionist readings of Hegel to offer a productive new interpretation of his notoriously difficult work, the Science of Logic. Rocío Zambrana transforms the revisionist tradition by distilling the theory of normativity that Hegel elaborates in the Science of Logic within the context of his signature treatment of negativity, unveiling how both features of his system of thought operate on his theory of intelligibility. Zambrana clarifies crucial features of Hegel’s theory of normativity previously thought to be absent from the argument of the Science of Logic—what she calls normative precariousness and normative ambivalence. She shows that Hegel’s theory of determinacy views intelligibility as both precarious, the result of practices and institutions that gain and lose authority throughout history, and ambivalent, accommodating opposite meanings and valences even when enjoying normative authority. In this way, Zambrana shows that the Science of Logic provides the philosophical justification for the necessary historicity of intelligibility. Intervening in several recent developments in the study of Kant, Hegel, and German Idealism more broadly, this book provides a productive new understanding of the value of Hegel’s systematic ambitions.

Normativity (Ethics) --- Philosophy, German --- Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, --- Philosophy, German - 19th century --- Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, - 1770-1831 - Wissenschaft der Logik

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

On ne peut compter ni sur l'intérêt individuel des hommes d'aujourd'hui ni sur leur altruisme, forcément limité, pour conserver les ressources nécessaires au bien-être de l'humanité à venir. Si les générations futures ont certains droits élémentaires envers le présent, ce sont des droits qui doivent être définis et réalisés par les hommes actuels sous la forme d'une responsabilité morale librement acceptée. Ce livre propose une théorie de la responsabilité envers le futur. Il en étudie les fondements, les contenus et les conséquences pratiques, pour les opposer à des pronostics qui sont, dans leur ensemble, de plus en plus sombres.

Ethics --- Ethiek --- Ethique --- Morale sociale --- Social ethics --- Sociale ethiek --- Responsibility --- Responsabilité --- Morale --- Morale sociale. --- Ethique de l'environnement. --- Responsabilité --- Éthique de l'environnement --- Civilization [Modern ] --- 1950-.... --- General ethics --- Responsibility. --- Future (Logic) --- Normativity (Ethics) --- Social ethics. --- Morale - 20e siècle.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Molly Cochran offers an account of the development of normative theory in international relations over the past two decades. In particular, she analyses the tensions between cosmopolitan and communitarian approaches to international ethics and offers an argument for a pragmatist approach.

814 Theorie van de internationale betrekkingen --- #SBIB:327.1H10 --- Internationale betrekkingen: theorieën --- International relations --- Normativity (Ethics). --- Pragmatism. --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Philosophy. --- Morale -- Norme --- Morale normative --- Normativiteit (Ethiek) --- Normativity (Ethics) --- Normativité (Ethique) --- Normativité morale --- Normativité éthique --- Norme (Morale) --- Norme morale --- Norme éthique --- Normes (Morale) --- Normes morales --- Normes éthiques --- Règle (Morale) --- Règle morale --- Règles (Morale) --- Règles morales --- Éthique normative --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Pragmatism --- Idealism --- Knowledge, Theory of --- Philosophy --- Philosophy, Modern --- Positivism --- Realism --- Utilitarianism --- Experience --- Reality --- Truth --- Ethical norms --- Normativeness (Ethics) --- Ethics