Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This paper studies the potential long-term effects of three illustrative scenarios using a multi-sector computable general equilibrium (CGE) trade model calibrated to 165 countries. The first scenario estimates effects from potential U.S. auto tariffs. The second analyzes a ‘transactional deal’ between the U.S. and China to close their bilateral deficit. The third, in the absence of such a deal, considers a potential escalation in bilateral tariffs between the two countries. Some common features emerge across all three scenarios: the overall effects on GDP tend to be relatively small albeit negative in most cases, including for the U.S. However, sectoral disruptions and positive and negative spillovers to highly exposed ‘by-stander’ economies can be large. There is also heterogeneity at the subnational level in the U.S. -- richer states tend to benefit from certain scenarios. We discuss how estimated impacts depend on the extent to which the U.S. is able to re-shore production in protected sectors. These results can usefully complement estimates obtained through macroeconomic models that are better suited to capture dynamic effects, such as those stemming from trade policy uncertainty. More generally, our results both underscore the value of adhering to the existing levels of liberalization, and highlight the risks associated with a fragmentation or even a complete breakdown of the trading system.
International trade --- Mathematical models. --- Exports and Imports --- Taxation --- General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium: Input-Output Tables and Analysis --- Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models --- Trade: General --- Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies --- Trade Policy --- International Trade Organizations --- Public finance & taxation --- International economics --- Tariffs --- Exports --- Imports --- Trade tensions --- Trade barriers --- Taxes --- Tariff --- Commercial policy --- United States
Choose an application
The Melitz model highlights the importance of the extensive margin (the number of firms exporting) for trade flows. Using the World Bank’s Exporter Dynamics Database (EDD) featuring firm-level exports from 50 countries, we find that around 50 percent of variation in exports is along the extensive margin—a quantitative victory for the Melitz framework. The remaining 50 percent on the intensive margin (exports per exporting firm) contradicts a special case of Melitz with Pareto-distributed firm productivity, which has become a tractable benchmark. This benchmark model predicts that, conditional on the fixed costs of exporting, all variation in exports across trading partners should occur on the extensive margin. We find that moving from a Pareto to a lognormal distribution allows the Melitz model to match the role of the intensive margin in the EDD. We use likelihood methods and the EDD to estimate a generalized Melitz model with a joint lognormal distribution for firm-level productivity, fixed costs and demand shifters, and use “exact hat algebra” to quantify the effects of a decline in trade costs on trade flows and welfare in the estimated model. The welfare effects turn out to be quite close to those in the standard Melitz-Pareto model when we choose the Pareto shape parameter to fit the average trade elasticity implied by our estimated Melitz-lognormal model, although there are significant differences regarding the effects on trade flows.
International trade --- Exports --- Econometric models. --- Costs --- Exports and Imports --- Public Finance --- International Economics --- Production and Operations Management --- Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies --- Trade: General --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Empirical Studies of Trade --- Trade Policy --- International Trade Organizations --- International economics --- Public finance & taxation --- Macroeconomics --- International trade & commerce --- Public expenditure review --- Productivity --- Trade balance --- Trade facilitation --- Expenditure --- Production --- Revenue administration --- Expenditures, Public --- Industrial productivity --- Balance of trade --- Customs administration --- China, People's Republic of
Choose an application
In March 2018, representatives of member countries of the African Union signed the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement. This agreement provides a framework for trade liberalization in goods and services and is expected to eventually cover all African countries. Using a multi-country, multi-sector general equilibrium model based on Costinot and Rodriguez-Clare (2014), we estimate the welfare effects of the AfCFTA for 45 countries in Africa. Three different model specifications—comprising both perfect competition and monopolistic competition—are used. Simulations include full elimination of import tariffs and partial but substantial reduction in non-tariff barriers (NTBs). Results reveal significant potential welfare gains from trade liberalization in Africa. As intra-regional import tariffs in the continent are already low, the bulk of these gains come from lowering NTBs. Overall gains for the continent are broadly similar under the three model specifications used, with considerable variation of potential welfare gains across countries in all model structures.
Commercial policy. --- Foreign trade policy --- International trade --- International trade policy --- Trade policy --- Economic policy --- International economic relations --- Government policy --- Exports and Imports --- Macroeconomics --- Taxation --- Neoclassical Models of Trade --- Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies --- Trade Policy --- International Trade Organizations --- Economic Integration --- Trade: Forecasting and Simulation --- Trade: General --- Empirical Studies of Trade --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- International economics --- Public finance & taxation --- Tariffs --- Trade barriers --- Imports --- Trade balance --- Income --- Taxes --- National accounts --- Tariff --- Commercial policy --- Balance of trade --- South Africa
Choose an application
We document a broad-based trend in rising cash holdings of firms across major industrialized countries over the last two decades, a trend that is most pronounced for firms engaged strongly in R&D activities. Our contributions to the literature are twofold. First, we develop a simple model that brings together the insights from modern trade theory (Melitz, 2003) with those of contract theory in corporate finance (Holmström and Tirole, 1998) to show that increased openness to trade can result in rising returns to innovation and in turn greater demand for cash as firms insure against innovation-induced liquidity risk. Second, we derive sharp empirical predictions and find supporting evidence for them using firm-level data across major G7 countries during 1995-2014, a period that saw an unprecedented rise in globalization and business innovation.
Corporations --- Finance --- Econometric models. --- Business corporations --- C corporations --- Corporations, Business --- Corporations, Public --- Limited companies --- Publicly held corporations --- Publicly traded corporations --- Public limited companies --- Stock corporations --- Subchapter C corporations --- Business enterprises --- Corporate power --- Disincorporation --- Stocks --- Trusts, Industrial --- Exports and Imports --- Finance: General --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Production and Operations Management --- Capital Budgeting --- Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies --- Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies --- Management of Technological Innovation and R&D --- Monetary Systems --- Standards --- Regimes --- Government and the Monetary System --- Payment Systems --- Trade: General --- Portfolio Choice --- Investment Decisions --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Monetary economics --- International economics --- Macroeconomics --- Currencies --- Exports --- Liquidity indicators --- Productivity --- Imports --- Money --- International trade --- Liquidity management --- Asset and liability management --- Production --- Liquidity --- Economics --- Industrial productivity --- China, People's Republic of
Choose an application
Literature on whether government spending crowds out or crowds in the private sector is large, but still without an unambiguous conclusion. Using firm-level data from Ukraine, this paper provides a granular empirical investigation to disentangle the impact of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) on private firm investment in Ukraine—a large transition economy. Controlling for firm characteristics and systematic differences across sectors, the results indicate that the SOE concentration in a given sector has a statistically significant negative effect on private fixed capital formation, and that the impact of SOEs is stronger in those industries in which SOEs have a more dominant presence. These findings imply that private firms operating in sectors with a high level of SOE concentration invest systematically less than businesses that are not competing directly with SOEs.
Corporations --- Business finance --- Capitalization (Finance) --- Corporate finance --- Corporate financial management --- Corporation finance --- Financial analysis of corporations --- Financial management, Corporate --- Financial management of corporations --- Financial planning of corporations --- Managerial finance --- Going public (Securities) --- Finance. --- Investments: General --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Taxation --- Investment --- Capital --- Intangible Capital --- Capacity --- Fiscal Policy --- Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies --- Empirical Studies of Trade --- Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise: General --- Debt --- Debt Management --- Sovereign Debt --- Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General --- Public finance & taxation --- Public ownership --- nationalization --- Private investment --- Public enterprises --- Government debt management --- Revenue sharing --- Expenditure --- National accounts --- Economic sectors --- Public financial management (PFM) --- Taxes --- Saving and investment --- Government business enterprises --- Debts, Public --- Expenditures, Public --- Ukraine --- Nationalization
Choose an application
Using cross-country national accounts and firm-level data, we document a broad-based trend in rising gross saving and net lending of non-financial corporates across major industrialized countries over the last two decades, though most pronounced in countries with persistent current account surpluses. We find that this trend holds consistently across major industries, and is concentrated among large firms, driven by rising profitability, lower financing costs, and reduced tax rates. At the same time, higher gross corporate saving have not supported a commensurate increase in fixed capital investment, but instead led to a build-up of liquid financial assets (cash). The determinants of corporate cash holding and saving are also broad-based across countries, with the growth in assets of large firms, R&D intensity, and lower effective tax rates accounting for most of the increase over the last 15 years.
Corporations --- Business finance --- Capitalization (Finance) --- Corporate finance --- Corporate financial management --- Corporation finance --- Financial analysis of corporations --- Financial management, Corporate --- Financial management of corporations --- Financial planning of corporations --- Managerial finance --- Going public (Securities) --- Finance. --- Accounting --- Corporate Finance --- Finance: General --- Macroeconomics --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Capital Budgeting --- Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies --- Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies --- Management of Technological Innovation and R&D --- Monetary Systems --- Standards --- Regimes --- Government and the Monetary System --- Payment Systems --- Portfolio Choice --- Investment Decisions --- General Aggregative Models: General --- Corporate Finance and Governance: General --- Public Administration --- Public Sector Accounting and Audits --- Monetary economics --- Finance --- Ownership & organization of enterprises --- Financial reporting, financial statements --- Currencies --- Liquidity indicators --- National accounts --- Corporate sector --- Financial statements --- Money --- Liquidity management --- Asset and liability management --- Economic sectors --- Public financial management (PFM) --- Liquidity --- Economics --- National income --- Business enterprises --- Finance, Public --- Germany
Listing 1 - 6 of 6 |
Sort by
|