Listing 1 - 9 of 9 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Post-crisis dynamics show a shrinkage in the overall amount of crossborder bank lending, which has been interpreted in the literature as a retreat in financial globalization. In this paper, we argue that aggregate figures are not sufficient to support such a claim in terms of the overall structure of the global banking network. Based on a systematic approach to measuring, mapping and analyzing financial interconnectedness among countries using network theory, we show that, despite the decline in aggregate lending volumes, the structure of the network has developed increased connections in some dimensions. Some parts of the network are currently more interlinked regionally than before the crisis, and less dependent on major global lenders. In this context, at a more disaggregate level, we document the characteristics of the increasing regionalization of lending flows, the different evolution of linkages through bank affiliates and direct cross-border claims, as well as the shift in the importance of key borrower and lender nodes. These changes in the banking network have important insights in terms of policy implications since they indicate that the global banking network has evolved, but it has not undergone a generalized retrenchment in financial linkages.
Banks and Banking --- Statistics --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Financial Aspects of Economic Integration --- International Finance: Other --- International Financial Markets --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology --- Computer Programs: Other --- Banking --- Econometrics & economic statistics --- Offshore financial centers --- International banking --- Cross-border banking --- Foreign banks --- Financial services --- Financial institutions --- Financial statistics --- Economic and financial statistics --- Banks and banking --- International finance --- Banks and banking, Foreign --- Finance --- United States
Choose an application
How does domestic monetary policy in systemic countries spillover to the rest of the world? This paper examines the transmission channel of domestic monetary policy in the cross-border context. We use exogenous shocks to monetary policy in systemically important economies, including the U.S., and local projections to estimate the dynamic effect of monetary policy shocks on bilateral cross-border bank lending. We find robust evidence that an increase in funding costs following an exogenous monetary tightening leads to a statistically and economically significant decline in cross-border bank lending. The effect is weakened during periods of high uncertainty. In contrast, the effect is found to not vary according to the degree of borrower country riskiness, further weakening support for the international portfolio rebalancing channel.
Monetary policy. --- Monetary management --- Economic policy --- Currency boards --- Money supply --- Banks and Banking --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Monetary Policy --- International Investment --- Long-term Capital Movements --- Current Account Adjustment --- Short-term Capital Movements --- International Policy Coordination and Transmission --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects --- Monetary economics --- Banking --- Bank credit --- Cross-border banking --- International banking --- Monetary tightening --- Central bank policy rate --- Money --- Financial services --- Monetary policy --- Credit --- International finance --- Interest rates --- United States
Choose an application
This paper sheds new light on the degree of international fiscal-financial spillovers by investigating the effect of domestic fiscal policies on cross-border bank lending. By estimating the dynamic response of U.S. cross-border bank lending towards the 45 recipient countries to exogenous domestic fiscal shocks (both measured by spending and revenue) between 1990Q1 and 2012Q4, we find that expansionary domestic fiscal shocks lead to a statistically significant increase in cross-border bank lending. The magnitude of the effect is also economically significant: the effect of 1 percent of GDP increase (decrease) in spending (revenue) is comparable to an exogenous decline in the federal funds rate. We also find that fiscal shocks tend to have larger effects during periods of recessions than expansions in the source country, and that the adverse effect of a fiscal consolidation is larger than the positive effect of the same size of a fiscal expansion. In contrast, we do not find systematic and statistically significant differences in the spillover effects across recipient countries depending on their exchange rate regime, although capital controls seem to play some moderating role. The extension of the analysis to a panel of 16 small open economies confirms the finding from the U.S. economy.
Fiscal policy. --- Tax policy --- Taxation --- Economic policy --- Finance, Public --- Government policy --- Banks and Banking --- Macroeconomics --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Public Finance --- Foreign Exchange --- Fiscal Policy --- International Investment --- Long-term Capital Movements --- Current Account Adjustment --- Short-term Capital Movements --- International Policy Coordination and Transmission --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General --- Externalities --- Banking --- Monetary economics --- Public finance & taxation --- Currency --- Foreign exchange --- Cross-border banking --- Bank credit --- Fiscal stimulus --- Expenditure --- Spillovers --- Financial services --- Money --- Fiscal policy --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Exchange rate arrangements --- International finance --- Credit --- Expenditures, Public --- United States
Choose an application
This paper analyzes the drivers of cross-border bank lending to 49 Emerging Markets (EMs) during the period 1990Q1-2014Q4, by assessing the impact of monetary, financial and real sector shocks in both the US and the euro area. The literature has traditionally highlighted the influence of US monetary policy on driving cross-border bank flows, and more recently the importance of both US and Euro Area (EA) financial/banking sectors’ related variables. Our contribution is the simultaneous analysis of the role of these US and EA drivers, as well as their interactions with real sector shocks. We corroborate the negative impact of US monetary policy tightening on cross-border lending to EMs, but we find that EA monetary policy seems to have an impact mostly on Emerging Europe, reflecting the fact that cross-border lending to most other EM regions is dollar denominated. We also find that real sector shocks in both the US and EA trigger an increase in cross-border lending, but less in EA when modeling the financial sector. Finally, for financial sector shocks, such as those associated with a decrease in bank leverage, our results indicate a broad-based overall contraction of cross-border lending if the shock originates in the US, and heterogenous effects across borrowing regions if the shock originates in the EA.
Monetary policy --- Banks and Banking --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Industries: Financial Services --- International Investment --- Long-term Capital Movements --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- International Financial Markets --- General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation --- Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- Financial Institutions and Services: General --- Banking --- Monetary economics --- Finance --- Bank credit --- Central bank policy rate --- Yield curve --- Cross-border banking --- Money --- Financial services --- Financial sector --- Economic sectors --- Banks and banking --- Interest rates --- Credit --- International finance --- Financial services industry --- United States
Choose an application
Using data collected from pan-African banks’ (PABs), balance sheets and other sources (Orbis, Fitch), this study identifies some key patterns of cross-border investment in bank subsidiaries by key banking groups in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and discusses some of the determinants of this investment. Using a gravity model relating the annual value of a banking group’s investment in the net equity of its subsidiaries to a set of explanatory variables, the analysis finds that cross-border banking is in part driven by a search for yield, diversification, and expansion for strategic reasons.
Banks and banking, International. --- International banking --- Offshore banking (Finance) --- Transnational banking --- Financial institutions, International --- International finance --- Banks and Banking --- Foreign Exchange --- Inflation --- Investments: Stocks --- Econometrics --- Current Account Adjustment --- Short-term Capital Movements --- International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Pension Funds --- Non-bank Financial Institutions --- Financial Instruments --- Institutional Investors --- Econometric Modeling: General --- Banking --- Currency --- Foreign exchange --- Macroeconomics --- Investment & securities --- Econometrics & economic statistics --- Exchange rates --- Cross-border banking --- Stocks --- Financial services --- Prices --- Financial institutions --- Gravity models --- Econometric analysis --- Banks and banking --- Econometric models --- South Africa
Choose an application
This paper analyzes cross-border macrofinancial spillovers from a variety of macroprudential policy measures, using a range of quantitative methods. Event study and panel regression analyses find that liquidity and sectoral macroprudential policy measures often affect cross-border bank credit, whereas capital measures do not. This empirical evidence is stronger for tightening than for loosening measures, is distributed across credit leakage and reallocation effects, and is generally regionally concentrated. Consistently, structural model based simulation analysis indicates that output and bank credit spillovers from sectoral macroprudential policy shocks are generally small worldwide, but are regionally concentrated and economically significant for countries connected by strong trade or financial linkages. This simulation analysis also indicates that countercyclical capital buffer adjustments have the potential to generate sizeable regional spillovers.
Financial risk management --- Macroeconomics --- Economics --- Risk management --- E-books --- Financial risk management. --- Macroeconomics. --- Banks and Banking --- Money and Monetary Policy --- International Policy Coordination and Transmission --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation --- Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Externalities --- Monetary economics --- Banking --- Macroprudential policy --- Bank credit --- Macroprudential policy instruments --- Cross-border banking --- Spillovers --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Money --- Financial services --- Economic policy --- Credit --- International finance --- Sweden
Choose an application
We analyze the joint impact of macroprudential and capital control measures on cross-border banking flows, while controlling for multidimensional aspects in lender-and-borrower-relationships (e.g., distance, cultural proximity, microprudential regulations). We uncover interesting spillover effects from both types of measures when applied either by lender or borrowing countries, with many of them most likely associated with circumvention or arbitrage incentives. While lender countries’ macroprudential policies reduce direct cross-border banking outflows, they are associated with larger outflows through local affiliates. Direct cross-border inflows are higher in borrower countries with more usage of macroprudential policies, and are linked to circumvention motives. In the case of capital controls, most spillovers seem to be present through local affiliates. We do not find evidence to support the idea that additional capital inflow controls could interact with macro-prudential policies to mitigate cross-border spillovers.
Banks and Banking --- Exports and Imports --- Macroeconomics --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- International Investment --- Long-term Capital Movements --- International Policy Coordination and Transmission --- International Financial Markets --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- Banking --- International economics --- Monetary economics --- Macroprudential policy instruments --- Cross-border banking --- Macroprudential policy --- Capital controls --- Financial sector policy and analysis --- Financial services --- Balance of payments --- Bank credit --- Money --- Economic policy --- International finance --- Banks and banking --- Capital movements --- Credit --- United States
Choose an application
This paper analyses the nature of the increasing regionalization process in global banking. Despite the large decline in aggregate cross-border banking lending volumes, some parts of the global banking network are currently more interlinked regionally than before the Global Financial Crisis. After developing a simple theoretical model capturing banks' internationalization decisions, our estimation shows that this regionalization trend is present even after controlling for traditional gravitational variables (e.g. distance, language, legal system, etc.), especially among lenders in EMs and non-core banking systems, such as Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Moreover, this regionalization trend was present before the GFC, but it has increased since then, and it seems to be associated with regulatory variables and the opportunities created by the retrenchment of several European lenders.
Monetary policy. --- Monetary management --- Economic policy --- Currency boards --- Money supply --- Banks and Banking --- Macroeconomics --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Financial Risk Management --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Financial Aspects of Economic Integration --- International Finance: Other --- International Financial Markets --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- Financial Crises --- Banking --- Monetary economics --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Foreign banks --- Bank credit --- Cross-border banking --- Global financial crisis of 2008-2009 --- Financial institutions --- Money --- Financial services --- Financial crises --- Banks and banking --- Banks and banking, Foreign --- Credit --- International finance --- Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009 --- United States
Choose an application
While global uncertainty—measured by the VIX—has proven to be a robust global “push” factor of international capital flows, there has been no systematic study assessing the role of country-specific uncertainty as a key (pull and push) factor of international capital flows. This paper tries to fill this gap in the literature by examining the effects of country-specific uncertainty shocks on cross-border banking flows using the confidential Bank for International Settlements Locational Banking Statistics data. The dyadic structure of this data allows to disentangle supply and demand factors and to better identify the effect of uncertainty shocks on cross-border banking flows. The results of this analysis suggest that: (i) uncertainty is both a push and pull factor that robustly predicts a decrease in both outflows (retrenchment) and inflows (stops); (ii) global banks rebalance their lending towards safer foreign borrowers from local borrowers when facing higher uncertainty; (iii) this rebalancing occurs only towards advanced economies (flight to quality), but not emerging market economies.
Banks and banking. --- Agricultural banks --- Banking --- Banking industry --- Commercial banks --- Depository institutions --- Finance --- Financial institutions --- Money --- Banks and Banking --- Finance: General --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Exports and Imports --- International Investment --- Long-term Capital Movements --- Current Account Adjustment --- Short-term Capital Movements --- International Policy Coordination and Transmission --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General --- Monetary economics --- International economics --- Cross-border banking --- Stock markets --- Bank credit --- Emerging and frontier financial markets --- Financial services --- Financial markets --- Capital flows --- Balance of payments --- International finance --- Banks and banking --- Stock exchanges --- Credit --- Financial services industry --- Capital movements --- United States
Listing 1 - 9 of 9 |
Sort by
|